Literature DB >> 22177844

Varicocele retrograde embolization with boiling contrast medium and gelatin sponges in adolescent subjects: a clinically effective therapeutic alternative.

C Matthew Hawkins1, John M Racadio, David N McKinney, Judy M Racadio, Doan N Vu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Varicoceles occur in approximately 15% of adolescent male subjects and may impair future fertility. The present study describes a varicocele treatment technique involving percutaneous retrograde embolization with boiling hot contrast medium and gelatin sponge pledgets.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of medical records and imaging of all patients who underwent percutaneous retrograde varicocele embolization from 2005 to 2010 was performed. Pre- and postembolization symptoms, physical findings, and ultrasound findings were documented. Fifteen patients (16 embolizations) were identified, with an average age of 15.9 years (range, 12-18 y). Nine were referred because of persistent varicocele after surgical ligation. Three had grade 2 and nine had grade 3 varicoceles. Two had grade 1 varicoceles; one was painful and one was associated with poor semen quality. One varicocele was not clinically evident, but was associated with persistently decreased testicular size. Nine patients had pain or discomfort, and six had no discomfort. Clinical resolution was defined by a combination of symptom resolution and a lack of physical examination findings of varicocele or findings of treated varicocele.
RESULTS: Fifteen of the 16 embolizations (94%) were technically successful. Clinical resolution was documented in 14 of 15 patients (95%); one patient experienced a recurrence at 30 months, which was successfully reembolized. One patient experienced temporary paresthesia of the left thigh. There were no major postprocedural complications. Mean follow-up duration was 11 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Retrograde embolization of varicoceles in adolescent subjects with the use of boiling hot contrast medium and gelatin sponges is a promising technique that appears effective.
Copyright © 2012 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22177844     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2011.10.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  5 in total

Review 1.  Varicocele: A Review.

Authors:  Brian F Baigorri; Robert G Dixon
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.513

2.  Treatment of male varicoceles by transcatheter polidocanol foam sclerotherapy: evaluation of clinical success, complications, and patients' satisfaction with regard to alternative techniques.

Authors:  Alma Ali; Stefan Wirth; Karla Maria Treitl; Marcus Treitl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-03-22       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Best practice in the diagnosis and treatment of varicocele in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Matthew R Macey; Ryan C Owen; Sherry S Ross; R Matthew Coward
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2018-06-22

4.  Comparison of three different embolic materials for varicocele embolization: retrospective study of tolerance, radiation and recurrence rate.

Authors:  Nicolas Favard; Morgan Moulin; Patricia Fauque; Aurélie Bertaut; Sylvain Favelier; Louis Estivalet; Frédéric Michel; Luc Cormier; Paul Sagot; Romaric Loffroy
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2015-12

5.  Contribution to the Pathophysiology and Treatment of Varicoceles.

Authors:  Peter Vanlangenhove
Journal:  J Belg Soc Radiol       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 1.894

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.