| Literature DB >> 22174901 |
Kelvin Yuen-Kwong Chan1, Chun-Ming Wong, Johnny Sheung-Him Kwan, Joyce Man-Fong Lee, Ka Wai Cheung, Man Fung Yuen, Ching Lung Lai, Ronnie Tung-Ping Poon, Pak Chung Sham, Irene Oi-Lin Ng.
Abstract
One of the most relevant risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development is chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, but only a fraction of chronic HBV carriers develop HCC, indicating that complex interactions among viral, environmental and genetic factors lead to HCC in HBV-infected patients. So far, host genetic factors have incompletely been characterized. Therefore, we performed a genome-wide association (GWA) study in a Southern Chinese cohort consisting of 95 HBV-infected HCC patients (cases) and 97 HBV-infected patients without HCC (controls) using the Illumina Human610-Quad BeadChips. The top single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were then validated in an independent cohort of 500 cases and 728 controls. 4 SNPs (rs12682266, rs7821974, rs2275959, rs1573266) at chromosome 8p12 showed consistent association in both the GWA and replication phases (OR(combined) = 1.31-1.39; p(combined) = 2.71 × 10(-5)-5.19 × 10(-4); PAR(combined) = 26-31%). We found a 2.3-kb expressed sequence tag (EST) in the region using in-silico data mining and verified the existence of the full-length EST experimentally. The expression level of the EST was significantly reduced in human HCC tumors in comparison to the corresponding non-tumorous liver tissues (P<0.001). Results from sequence analysis and in-vitro protein translation study suggest that the transcript might function as a long non-coding RNA. In summary, our study suggests that variations at chromosome 8p12 may promote HCC in patients with HBV. Further functional studies of this region may help understand HBV-associated hepatocarcinogenesis.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22174901 PMCID: PMC3234276 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028798
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Manhattan plot of GWA study results of testing for association with HBV-related HCC susceptibility.
The dotted line indicates the p-value threshold of 1×10−5. The circled SNPs are those passing the threshold (Table 1).
Summary of association of SNPs in GWA and replication studies.
| Chr | SNP | Position | Risk/non-risk allele | GWA study (Ncase = 95, Ncontrol = 97) | Replication (Ncase = 500, Ncontrol = 728) | Combined (Ncase = 595, Ncontrol = 825) | ||||||||||
| RAF in cases | RAF in controls | OR | P-value | RAF in cases | RAF in controls | OR | P-value | RAF in cases | RAF in controls | OR | P-value | PAR | ||||
| 8 | rs12682266 | 37548149 | G/A | 0.64 | 0.41 | 2.55 | 6.69×10−6 | 0.55 | 0.49 | 1.25 | 7.10×10−3 | 0.56 | 0.48 | 1.38 | 3.76×10−5 | 0.285 |
| 8 | rs7821974 | 37569159 | T/C | 0.62 | 0.39 | 2.54 | 7.01×10−6 | 0.54 | 0.49 | 1.20 | 2.61×10−2 | 0.55 | 0.48 | 1.33 | 2.32×10−4 | 0.255 |
| 8 | rs2275959 | 37574217 | T/C | 0.54 | 0.31 | 2.59 | 6.35×10−6 | 0.46 | 0.42 | 1.18 | 4.75×10−2 | 0.47 | 0.41 | 1.31 | 5.19×10−4 | 0.213 |
| 8 | rs1573266 | 37581577 | C/T | 0.69 | 0.47 | 2.58 | 7.44×10−6 | 0.59 | 0.54 | 1.26 | 5.20×10−3 | 0.61 | 0.53 | 1.39 | 2.71×10−5 | 0.313 |
| 11 | rs2611145 | 34240437 | T/C | 0.52 | 0.29 | 2.56 | 9.31×10−6 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Chr, chromosome; RAF, risk allele frequency; OR, odds ratio.
Based on NCBI build 36.
Figure 2Expression of the EST in human HCCs and cell line.
(A) Quantitative expression analysis of the EST transcript in the HBV-associated HCCs showed that the EST transcript was significantly under-expressed in HCC tumors when compared with the corresponding non-tumorous livers (P<0.0001, non-parametric paired t-test). Dots: the ratio of expression level of the transcript versus the level of GAPDH in each testing sample. Horizontal lines: mean of the relative expression level in the HCC tumors and non-tumorous livers. (B) Left panel: Schematic diagram of the FLAG-tagged expression constructs. Right panel: Western blot analysis of FLAG-tagged EST translation in HepG2 cell line. The FLAG-tag could be translated only when tagged at the N-terminus of the ORF but not at the C-terminus. β-actin served as a loading control. EV: empty vector, FLAG-ORF: N-terminal FLAG-tagged ORF, ORF-FLAG: C-terminal FLAG-tagged ORF.