Literature DB >> 22173949

Bihelix: Towards de novo structure prediction of an ensemble of G-protein coupled receptor conformations.

Ravinder Abrol1, Jenelle K Bray, William A Goddard.   

Abstract

G-Protein Coupled Receptors (GPCRs) play a critical role in cellular signal transduction pathways and are prominent therapeutic targets. Recently there has been major progress in obtaining experimental structures for a few GPCRs. Each GPCR, however, exhibits multiple conformations that play a role in their function and we have been developing methods aimed at predicting structures for all these conformations. Analysis of available structures shows that these conformations differ in relative helix tilts and rotations. The essential issue is, determining how to orient each of the seven helices about its axis since this determines how it interacts with the other six helices. Considering all possible helix rotations to ensure that no important packings are overlooked, and using rotation angle increments of 30° about the helical axis would still lead to 12(7) or 35 million possible conformations each with optimal residue positions. We show in this paper how to accomplish this. The fundamental idea is to optimize the interactions between each pair of contacting helices while ignoring the other 5 and then to estimate the energies of all 35 million combinations using these pair-wise interactions. This BiHelix approach dramatically reduces the effort to examine the complete set of conformations and correctly identifies the crystal packing for the experimental structures plus other near-native packings we believe may play an important role in activation. This approach also enables a detailed structural analysis of functionally distinct conformations using helix-helix interaction energy landscapes and should be useful for other helical transmembrane proteins as well.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GPCRs; conformational ensemble; helical membrane proteins; helix-helix interactions; protein structure prediction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22173949      PMCID: PMC3310341          DOI: 10.1002/prot.23216

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  53 in total

1.  PREDICT modeling and in-silico screening for G-protein coupled receptors.

Authors:  Sharon Shacham; Yael Marantz; Shay Bar-Haim; Ori Kalid; Dora Warshaviak; Noa Avisar; Boaz Inbal; Alexander Heifetz; Merav Fichman; Maya Topf; Zvi Naor; Silvia Noiman; Oren M Becker
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-10-01

2.  The retinal conformation and its environment in rhodopsin in light of a new 2.2 A crystal structure.

Authors:  Tetsuji Okada; Minoru Sugihara; Ana-Nicoleta Bondar; Marcus Elstner; Peter Entel; Volker Buss
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2004-09-10       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Predictions of CCR1 chemokine receptor structure and BX 471 antagonist binding followed by experimental validation.

Authors:  Nagarajan Vaidehi; Sabine Schlyer; Rene J Trabanino; Wely B Floriano; Ravinder Abrol; Shantanu Sharma; Monica Kochanny; Sunil Koovakat; Laura Dunning; Meina Liang; James M Fox; Filipa Lopes de Mendonça; James E Pease; William A Goddard; Richard Horuk
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 4.  Drug efficacy at G protein-coupled receptors.

Authors:  Terry Kenakin
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 13.820

Review 5.  Multiple switches in G protein-coupled receptor activation.

Authors:  Shivani Ahuja; Steven O Smith
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2009-09-03       Impact factor: 14.819

Review 6.  When 7 transmembrane receptors are not G protein-coupled receptors.

Authors:  Keshava Rajagopal; Robert J Lefkowitz; Howard A Rockman
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 7.  The structure and function of G-protein-coupled receptors.

Authors:  Daniel M Rosenbaum; Søren G F Rasmussen; Brian K Kobilka
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  The 2.6 angstrom crystal structure of a human A2A adenosine receptor bound to an antagonist.

Authors:  Veli-Pekka Jaakola; Mark T Griffith; Michael A Hanson; Vadim Cherezov; Ellen Y T Chien; J Robert Lane; Adriaan P Ijzerman; Raymond C Stevens
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 9.  New G-protein-coupled receptor crystal structures: insights and limitations.

Authors:  Brian Kobilka; Gebhard F X Schertler
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 14.819

10.  Independent beta-arrestin2 and Gq/protein kinase Czeta pathways for ERK stimulated by angiotensin type 1A receptors in vascular smooth muscle cells converge on transactivation of the epidermal growth factor receptor.

Authors:  Jihee Kim; Seungkirl Ahn; Keshava Rajagopal; Robert J Lefkowitz
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-03-02       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  15 in total

1.  Ligand- and mutation-induced conformational selection in the CCR5 chemokine G protein-coupled receptor.

Authors:  Ravinder Abrol; Bartosz Trzaskowski; William A Goddard; Alexandre Nesterov; Ivan Olave; Christopher Irons
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Activation mechanism of the G protein-coupled sweet receptor heterodimer with sweeteners and allosteric agonists.

Authors:  Soo-Kyung Kim; Yalu Chen; Ravinder Abrol; William A Goddard; Brian Guthrie
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Molecular basis for dramatic changes in cannabinoid CB1 G protein-coupled receptor activation upon single and double point mutations.

Authors:  Caitlin E Scott; Ravinder Abrol; Kwang H Ahn; Debra A Kendall; William A Goddard
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  How broadly tuned olfactory receptors equally recognize their agonists. Human OR1G1 as a test case.

Authors:  Landry Charlier; Jérémie Topin; Catherine Ronin; Soo-Kyung Kim; William A Goddard; Roman Efremov; Jérôme Golebiowski
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 9.261

5.  Structure-based prediction of subtype selectivity of histamine H3 receptor selective antagonists in clinical trials.

Authors:  Soo-Kyung Kim; Peter Fristrup; Ravinder Abrol; William A Goddard
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  Characterizing and predicting the functional and conformational diversity of seven-transmembrane proteins.

Authors:  Ravinder Abrol; Soo-Kyung Kim; Jenelle K Bray; Adam R Griffith; William A Goddard
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 3.608

7.  Improving homology modeling of G-protein coupled receptors through multiple-template derived conserved inter-residue interactions.

Authors:  Rajan Chaudhari; Andrew J Heim; Zhijun Li
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 3.686

8.  Computationally-predicted CB1 cannabinoid receptor mutants show distinct patterns of salt-bridges that correlate with their level of constitutive activity reflected in G protein coupling levels, thermal stability, and ligand binding.

Authors:  Kwang H Ahn; Caitlin E Scott; Ravinder Abrol; William A Goddard; Debra A Kendall
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2013-06-14

9.  SuperBiHelix method for predicting the pleiotropic ensemble of G-protein-coupled receptor conformations.

Authors:  Jenelle K Bray; Ravinder Abrol; William A Goddard; Bartosz Trzaskowski; Caitlin E Scott
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Predicted 3D structures of olfactory receptors with details of odorant binding to OR1G1.

Authors:  Soo-Kyung Kim; William A Goddard
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 3.686

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.