Literature DB >> 22173765

Efficacy of diffusion-weighted imaging for the differentiation between lymphomas and carcinomas of the nasopharynx and oropharynx: correlations of apparent diffusion coefficients and histologic features.

Y Ichikawa1, M Sumi, M Sasaki, T Sumi, T Nakamura.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: ADCs may help distinguish benign from malignant head and neck diseases. We sought to evaluate the effectiveness of ADC for differentiating between carcinomas and lymphomas of the nasopharynx and oropharynx.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively compared the ADCs between 24 histologically proved lymphomas and 32 carcinomas, including 8 NPCs and 7 lymphomas of the nasopharynx, and 24 SCCs and 17 lymphomas of the oropharynx. ADCs were determined on tumor-by-tumor (overall ADCs) and pixel-by-pixel (ADC mapping) bases by using 2 b-values (500 and 1000 s/mm(2)).
RESULTS: Lymphomas and oropharyngeal SCCs had unique histologic features in terms of keratinization, cell attenuation, stromal areas, and necrosis and had distinctive ADCs (0.503 ± 0.099 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s for lymphomas and 0.842 ± 0.164 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s for SCCs). However, NPCs and lymphomas were similar in terms of these histologic features, exhibiting comparable ADCs (0.567 ± 0.057 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s for NPCs and 0.528 ± 0.094 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s for lymphomas). Poorly and moderately differentiated SCCs with homogeneous T2 signals were indistinguishable from lymphomas on conventional MR images; however, ADCs of these SCC subtypes were significantly larger than those of lymphomas. ADC mapping profiles with respect to percentage of tumor areas of extremely low, intermediate, and high ADC levels were well-correlated with the histologic features of lymphomas, NPCs, and different types of SCCs.
CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness of ADC-based differentiation between lymphomas and carcinomas of the nasopharynx and oropharynx depends on their histologic characteristics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22173765      PMCID: PMC8050466          DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2834

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  13 in total

Review 1.  Looking into the functional architecture of the brain with diffusion MRI.

Authors:  Denis Le Bihan
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Apparent diffusion coefficient mapping of salivary gland tumors: prediction of the benignancy and malignancy.

Authors:  S Eida; M Sumi; N Sakihama; H Takahashi; T Nakamura
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  MR imaging of intravoxel incoherent motions: application to diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disorders.

Authors:  D Le Bihan; E Breton; D Lallemand; P Grenier; E Cabanis; M Laval-Jeantet
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  OsiriX: an open-source software for navigating in multidimensional DICOM images.

Authors:  Antoine Rosset; Luca Spadola; Osman Ratib
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2004-06-29       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Diagnostic importance of focal defects in the apparent diffusion coefficient-based differentiation between lymphoma and squamous cell carcinoma nodes in the neck.

Authors:  Misa Sumi; Takashi Nakamura
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Current management strategy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  William I Wei; Dora L W Kwong
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 3.372

7.  Intraobserver variability in the MR determination of tumor volume in squamous cell carcinoma of the pharynx.

Authors:  Andrew R Gordon; Laurie A Loevner; Amita Shukla-Dave; Regina O Redfern; Adina I Sonners; Alex M Kilger; Mark A Elliott; Mitchell Machtay; Randal S Weber; Jerry D Glickson; David I Rosenthal
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Discrimination of metastatic cervical lymph nodes with diffusion-weighted MR imaging in patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Misa Sumi; Noriyuki Sakihama; Tadateru Sumi; Minoru Morikawa; Masataka Uetani; Hiroyuki Kabasawa; Koichiro Shigeno; Kuniaki Hayashi; Haruo Takahashi; Takashi Nakamura
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 9.  Oropharyngeal cancer: current understanding and management.

Authors:  David M Cohan; Saurin Popat; Seth E Kaplan; Nestor Rigual; Thom Loree; Wesley L Hicks
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.064

10.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of ameloblastomas and keratocystic odontogenic tumors: differentiation by apparent diffusion coefficients of cystic lesions.

Authors:  M Sumi; Y Ichikawa; I Katayama; S Tashiro; T Nakamura
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 3.825

View more
  16 in total

1.  Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: comparison of diffusion and perfusion characteristics between different tumour stages using intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging.

Authors:  Vincent Lai; Xiao Li; Victor Ho Fun Lee; Ka On Lam; Daniel Yee Tak Fong; Bingsheng Huang; Queenie Chan; Pek Lan Khong
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging: comparison of diffusion and perfusion characteristics between nasopharyngeal carcinoma and post-chemoradiation fibrosis.

Authors:  Vincent Lai; Xiao Li; Victor Ho Fun Lee; Ka On Lam; Queenie Chan; Pek Lan Khong
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Diffusion-weighted imaging in the head and neck region: usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficient values for characterization of lesions.

Authors:  İsmail Şerifoğlu; İbrahim İlker Oz; Murat Damar; Özlem Tokgöz; Ömer Yazgan; Zuhal Erdem
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.630

4.  Differential diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma and nasopharyngeal lymphoma based on DCE-MRI and RESOLVE-DWI.

Authors:  Chengru Song; Peng Cheng; Jingliang Cheng; Yong Zhang; Mengtian Sun; Shanshan Xie; Xiaonan Zhang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Apparent diffusion coefficient for discriminating metastatic lymph nodes in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Authors:  Yeliz Pekçevik; İbrahim Çukurova; İlker Burak Arslan
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.630

6.  Magnetic resonance imaging of methotrexate-related lymphoproliferative disorder with a chief complaint of oral symptoms.

Authors:  Ami Kuribayashi; Sakurako Kawashima; Kou Kayamori; Junichiro Sakamoto; Hiroshi Tomisato; Hiroshi Watanabe; Tohru Kurabayashi
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 1.852

7.  Quantitative parameters derived from 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging can accurately estimate the histologic grade of hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma preoperatively.

Authors:  Zhaoting Meng; Lingyu Zhang; Caiyun Huang; Yingshi Piao; Xiaohong Chen; Junfang Xian
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 2.995

8.  Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient value with prognostic parameters.

Authors:  Ahmed Abdel Khalek Abdel Razek; Elsharawey Kamal
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 3.469

9.  Quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MRI for differentiation between nasopharyngeal carcinoma and lymphoma at the primary site.

Authors:  Xiao-ping Yu; Jing Hou; Fei-ping Li; Wang Xiang; Qiang Lu; Yin Hu; Hui Wang
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 2.419

10.  Functional imaging of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma with diffusion-weighted MRI and FDG PET/CT: quantitative analysis of ADC and SUV.

Authors:  Arthur Varoquaux; Olivier Rager; Karl-Olof Lovblad; Karen Masterson; Pavel Dulguerov; Osman Ratib; Christoph D Becker; Minerva Becker
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.