OBJECTIVES: To differentiate acute from chronic damage to the myocardium in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) using DE and T2w MR. METHODS: Short-axis T2w and DE MR images were acquired twice after the onset of MI in 36 patients who successfully underwent emergency coronary revascularisation. The areas of infarct and oedema were measured. The oedema-infarct ratio (O/I) of the left ventricular area was calculated by dividing the oedema by the infarct area. RESULTS: The oedema size on T2w MR was significantly larger than the infarct size on DE MR in the acute phase. Both the oedema size on T2w MR and the infarct size on DE MR in the acute phase were significantly larger than those in the chronic phase. The O/I was significantly greater in the acute phase compared with that in the chronic phase (P < 0.05). An analysis of relative cumulative frequency distributions revealed an O/I of 1.4 as a cut-off value for differentiating acute from chronic myocardial damage with the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 85.1%, 82.7% and 83.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The oedema-infarct ratio may be a useful index in differentiating acute from chronic myocardial damage in patients with MI. KEY POINTS: MR can differentiate reversible from irreversible myocardial damage after myocardial infarction. MR is a useful modality to noninvasively differentiate the infarct stages. The O/I is an important index to decide therapeutic strategies.
OBJECTIVES: To differentiate acute from chronic damage to the myocardium in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) using DE and T2w MR. METHODS: Short-axis T2w and DE MR images were acquired twice after the onset of MI in 36 patients who successfully underwent emergency coronary revascularisation. The areas of infarct and oedema were measured. The oedema-infarct ratio (O/I) of the left ventricular area was calculated by dividing the oedema by the infarct area. RESULTS: The oedema size on T2w MR was significantly larger than the infarct size on DE MR in the acute phase. Both the oedema size on T2w MR and the infarct size on DE MR in the acute phase were significantly larger than those in the chronic phase. The O/I was significantly greater in the acute phase compared with that in the chronic phase (P < 0.05). An analysis of relative cumulative frequency distributions revealed an O/I of 1.4 as a cut-off value for differentiating acute from chronic myocardial damage with the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 85.1%, 82.7% and 83.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The oedema-infarct ratio may be a useful index in differentiating acute from chronic myocardial damage in patients with MI. KEY POINTS: MR can differentiate reversible from irreversible myocardial damage after myocardial infarction. MR is a useful modality to noninvasively differentiate the infarct stages. The O/I is an important index to decide therapeutic strategies.
Authors: Heiko Mahrholdt; Anja Wagner; Thomas A Holly; Michael D Elliott; Robert O Bonow; Raymond J Kim; Robert M Judd Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-10-29 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Alexander Stork; Kai Muellerleile; Paul M Bansmann; Joachim Graessner; Michael Kaul; Joern Kemper; Gerhard Adam; Gunnar K Lund Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2006-12-06 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: T H Lim; M K Hong; J S Lee; C W Mun; S J Park; S W Park; J S Ryu; J H Lee; D Chien; G Laub Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 1997 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 4.813