Literature DB >> 22173511

Evaluating the growth of pulmonary nodular ground-glass opacity on CT: comparison of volume rendering and thin slice images.

Mingzhu Liang1, Xueguo Liu2, Weidong Li3, Kunwei Li1, Xiangmeng Chen1, Guojie Wang1, Kai Chen1, Jinxin Zhang3.   

Abstract

This study examined the value of volume rendering (VR) interpretation in assessing the growth of pulmonary nodular ground-glass opacity (nGGO). A total of 47 nGGOs (average size, 9.5 mm; range, 5.7-20.6 mm) were observed by CT scanning at different time under identical parameter settings. The growth of nGGO was analyzed by three radiologists by comparing the thin slice (TS) CT images of initial and repeat scans with side-by-side cine mode. One week later synchronized VR images of the two scans were compared by side-by-side cine mode to evaluate the nGGO growth. The nodule growth was rated on a 5-degree scale: notable growth, slight growth, dubious growth, stagnant growth, shrinkage. Growth standard was defined as: Density increase ≥ 30 HU and (or) diameter increase (by 20% in nodules ≥ 10 mm, 30% in nodules of 5-9 mm). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) was performed. The results showed that 32 nGGOs met the growth criteria (29 nGGOs showed an increase in density; 1 nGGO showed an increase in diameter; 2 nGGOs showed an increase in both diameter and density). Area under ROC curve revealed that the performance with VR interpretation was better than that with TS interpretation (P<0.01, P<0.05 and P<0.05 for observers A, B and C respectively). Consistency between different observers was excellent with both VR interpretation (κ=0.89 for observers A&amp;C, A&amp;B, B&amp;C) and TS interpretation (κ=0.71 for A&amp;B, κ=0.68 for A&amp;C, κ= 0.74 for B&amp;C), but time spending was less with VR interpretation than with TS interpretation (P<0.0001, P<0.0001 and P<0.05 for observers A, B and C, respectively). It was concluded that VR is a useful technique for evaluating the growth of nGGO.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22173511     DOI: 10.1007/s11596-011-0689-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci        ISSN: 1672-0733


  26 in total

1.  Small pulmonary nodules: volumetrically determined growth rates based on CT evaluation.

Authors:  D F Yankelevitz; A P Reeves; W J Kostis; B Zhao; C I Henschke
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Three-dimensional volume rendering of spiral CT data: theory and method.

Authors:  P S Calhoun; B S Kuszyk; D G Heath; J C Carley; E K Fishman
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1999 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.333

3.  Volumetric measurements of pulmonary nodules at multi-row detector CT: in vivo reproducibility.

Authors:  Dag Wormanns; Gerhard Kohl; Ernst Klotz; Anke Marheine; Florian Beyer; Walter Heindel; Stefan Diederich
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-11-13       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Five-year lung cancer screening experience: CT appearance, growth rate, location, and histologic features of 61 lung cancers.

Authors:  Rebecca M Lindell; Thomas E Hartman; Stephen J Swensen; James R Jett; David E Midthun; Henry D Tazelaar; Jayawant N Mandrekar
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  Ground-glass opacity at CT: the ABCs.

Authors:  J Collins; E J Stern
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Growth rate of small lung cancers detected on mass CT screening.

Authors:  M Hasegawa; S Sone; S Takashima; F Li; Z G Yang; Y Maruyama; T Watanabe
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Volumetric rendering techniques: applications for three-dimensional imaging of the hip.

Authors:  E K Fishman; B Drebin; D Magid; W W Scott; D R Ney; A F Brooker; L H Riley; J A St Ville; E A Zerhouni; S S Siegelman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Early Lung Cancer Action Project: overall design and findings from baseline screening.

Authors:  C I Henschke; D I McCauley; D F Yankelevitz; D P Naidich; G McGuinness; O S Miettinen; D M Libby; M W Pasmantier; J Koizumi; N K Altorki; J P Smith
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-07-10       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Lung cancer screening with CT: Mayo Clinic experience.

Authors:  Stephen J Swensen; James R Jett; Thomas E Hartman; David E Midthun; Jeff A Sloan; Anne-Marie Sykes; Gregory L Aughenbaugh; Medy A Clemens
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-01-24       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Nodular ground-glass opacities on thin-section CT: size change during follow-up and pathological results.

Authors:  Hyun Ju Lee; Jin Mo Goo; Chang Hyun Lee; Chul-Gyu Yoo; Young Tae Kim; Jung-Gi Im
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.500

View more
  1 in total

1.  Stage I lung adenocarcinoma: the value of quantitative CT in differentiating pathological subtypes and predicting growth of subsolid nodules.

Authors:  Xianqun Xu; Kaisong Wu; Yanyan Zhao; Liejun Mei
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.889

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.