| Literature DB >> 22173338 |
Yoshinori Kadoma1, Seiichiro Fujisawa.
Abstract
The radical-scavenging activity of dietary phytophenols has been investigated by many researches due to their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and anticancer property but the radical-scavenging effect of 2-phytophenol and the phytophenol:co-antioxidants, vitamin C and thiol combination under nearly anaerobic conditions still remains unknown. The radical-scavenging activity for seventeen phytophenols and for six synthetic phenols (positive controls) was investigated using the induction period method in the polymerization of methyl methacrylates (MMA) initiated by thermal decomposition of benzoyl peroxide (BPO) by monitoring differential scanning calorimetery (DSC). The k(inh) for the phytophenols was likely with the range 0.5 × 10³ M⁻¹s⁻¹-2.2 × 10³ M⁻¹s⁻¹, whereas that for synthetic phenols, hydroquinone and galvinoxyl, was with the range 7 × 10³ M⁻¹s⁻¹-8 × 10³ M⁻¹s⁻¹. Also, the additive scavenging effect of the (-)-epigallocatechin (EGC):(-)-epicatechin (EC) and the (+)-catechin:epicatechin (EC) combination was observed at 1:1 molar ratio, whereas that of the EC:quercetin combination showed the cancel (prooxidative) effect. Furthermore, the EGC:ASDB (L-ascorbyl 2,6-dibutylate) or 2-ME (2-mercaptoethanol) combination showed the prooxidative effect. Such enhancement of prooxidation in the combination may increase their toxic effects due to their cooxidation. Also, the synergic, additive or cancel effects of the flavonoid:vitamins E combination on the induction period in the BPO (a PhCOO* radical) and 2,2'-azobisisobutyronitrile (AIBN, an R* radical) systems are discussed.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22173338 PMCID: PMC6264750 DOI: 10.3390/molecules161210457
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Exothermic curves for the polymerization of MMA with BPO in the presence of capsaicin.
Figure 2Time-conversion curves for the polymerization of MMA with BPO in the presence of capsaicin.
Radical-scavenging activity for dietary phutophenols and synthetic phenols using induction period.
| Phenolic antioxidants | Induction period method a) | DPPH method b) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| kinh × 10−3 | ||||
|
| (M−1s−1) | KCL c) | EC50 (mM) | |
| A) Phytophenols | ||||
| EGC | 2.6 | 0.85 | 478 | 0.01 |
| EGCG | 5.0 | 0.50 | 420 | 0.003 |
| Eugenol | 1.4 | 1.01 | 587 | 0.082 |
| Caffeic acid | 1.8 | 1.07 | 569 | 0.027 |
| Capsaicin | 0.6 | 1.49 | 570 | _ |
| Catechin | 3.2 | 0.66 | 501 | _ |
| Chlorogenic acid | 1.7 | 0.93 | 587 | _ |
| 1.1 | 1.71 | 541 | _ | |
| Curcumin | 2.5 | 0.68 | 550 | 0.043 |
| nar | nar | nar | _ | |
| Hesperetin | 1.0 | 2.21 | 548 | _ |
| Isoeugenol | 1.8 | 0.87 | 610 | 0.056 |
| Ferulic acid | 1.6 | 1.20 | 560 | 0.145 |
| 1.2 | 1.31 | 585 | 0.007 | |
| Quercetin | 1.8 | 0.98 | 600 | 0.017 |
| Resveratrol | 2.3 | 0.81 | 567 | 0.11 |
| Tetrahydrocurcumin | 3.3 | 0.79 | 584 | 0.035 |
| B) Synthetic phenols | ||||
| BHT | 1.9 | 0.79 | 583 | 0.1 |
| Bisphenol A | 2.5 | 0.81 | 563 | _ |
| 1.7 | 1.04 | 487 | _ | |
| DPPH | 0.8 | 3.11 | 606 | _ |
| Galvinoxyl | 0.3 | 8.24 | 578 | _ |
| Hydroquinone (HQ) | 1.0 | 7.02 | 454 | |
a) Described in the text; b) Anti-DPPH radical activity carried out as follows: For each phenols, various concentrations were tested in ethanol. The decrease in absorbance was determined at 517 nm for 10 min at room temperature. Antiradical activity was defined as the amount of inhibitor necessary to decrease the DPPH radical concentration by 50% (EC50(mol/L)). DPPH, 0.1 mM; nar: no appreciable rate.
Figure 3Relationships between induction period (A) or initial rate of polymerization (B) and the square root of mol% of BPO.
Figure 4Plots of the induction period (left side panel) or the initial rate of polymerization (right side panel) against the concentrations of capsaicin.
Radical-scavenging activity for 2-polyphenols combination.
| Polyphenols a) | Induction period (IP) | Rp b) | Conversion | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (min) | (min) | (%/min) | (%) | |||
| Observed (A) | Calculated (B) | B/A | ||||
| Control | 6.958 | _ | _ | 0.973 | 95.0 | |
| Epicatechin (EC) | 35.005 | _ | _ | 0.875 | 93.0 | |
| Epigallocatechin (EGC) | 30.188 | _ | _ | 0.873 | 93.9 | |
| Catechin | 34.314 | _ | _ | 0.888 | 93.2 | |
| Quercetin | 25.027 | _ | _ | 0.893 | 94.2 | |
| EC + Catechin | 69.623 | 69.319 | 1.000 | 0.797 | 92.4 | |
| EC + EGC | 60.301 | 65.193 | 0.924 | 0.866 | 92.3 | |
| EC + Quercetin | 49.968 | 65.133 | 0.767 * | 0.901 | 93.0 | |
a) Each 1 mM; b) Propagation rate (initial rate of polymerization). The IP is the mean of three independent experiments. The standard errors are <8%. * A vs. B, p < 0.01.
The radical-scavenging activity for EC, EGC and the EGC:EC, ASDB or 2-mercaptoethanol (2-ME) combination.
| Polyphenols a) | Induction period | Rp b) | Conversion | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (min) | (min) | (%/min) | (%) | ||
| Observed (A) | Calculated (B) | B/A | |||
| Control | 7.407 | _ | _ | 0.927 | 95.1 |
| Epicatechin (EC) | 34.028 | _ | _ | 0.866 | 93.4 |
| Epigallocatechin (EGC) | 26.908 | _ | _ | 0.885 | 93.6 |
| ASDB | 7.411 | _ | _ | 0.927 | 94.9 |
| 2-ME | 9.218 | _ | _ | 9.218 | 95.0 |
| EGC + EC | 59.02 | 60.936 | 0.970 | 0.840 | 92.6 |
| EGC + ASDB | 29.612 | 34.319 | 0.860* | 0.893 | 93.3 |
| EGC +2-ME | 29.373 * | 36.126 | 0.810* | 0.891 | 93.2 |
a) Each 1 mM, b) propagation rate (initial rate of polymerization), ASDB (L-ascorbyl 2,6-dibutylate). The values are the mean of three independent experiments. The standard errors are <10%. *A vs. B, p < 0.01.