| Literature DB >> 22173336 |
Jiandong Zhao1, Yu Su, Aiting Chen, Hu Yuan, Liangfa Liu, Wenming Wu.
Abstract
Oxidative stress is involved in the development and progression of otitis media (OM). In this study, we investigated the effect of Ginkgo leaf parenteral solution on blood and cochlea antioxidant and immunity indexs in OM rats. In OM model rats, blood and cochlea malondialdehyde (MDA), nitric oxide (NO), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-8 (IL-8) and interleukin-10 (IL-10) levels were significantly increased, whereas antioxidant enzymes activities (superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) and glutathione reductase (GR)) were significantly decreased compared with normal rats. Treatment with Ginkgo leaf parenteral solution restored the altered parameters in a dose-dependent manner. We conclude that Ginkgo leaf parenteral solution confers protection against oxidative injuries in OM rats by increasing activities of antioxidants and immunity, suggesting a potential drug for the prevention and therapy of OM.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22173336 PMCID: PMC6264202 DOI: 10.3390/molecules161210433
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Effect of Ginkgo leaf parenteral solution on the content of MDA and reduced glutathione (GSH) in tissues of normal and experimental groups.
| Group | MDA | NO (nmol/mg protein) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Serum (nmol/mL) | Cochlea (nmol/mg protein) | Serum (μmol/L) | Cochlea (μmol/g tissue) | |
| I | 3.85 ± 0.14 | 2.17 ± 0.11 | 127.37 ± 7.04 | 82.49 ± 7.93 |
| II | 7.58 ± 0.32 ** | 8.64 ± 0.35 ** | 253.32 ± 18.61 ** | 121.33 ± 8.71 ** |
| III | 5.07 ± 0.21 ## | 4.62 ± 0.19 ## | 199.54 ± 10.12 ## | 100.39 ± 9.01 ## |
| IV | 4.11 ± 0.19 ## | 2.98 ± 0.14 ## | 136.14 ± 11.53 ## | 90.44 ± 7.13 ## |
| V | 3.88 ± 0.42 ## | 2.31 ± 0.18 ## | 130.5 ± 12.54 ## | 84.51 ± 9.04 ## |
** p < 0.01, compared with group I; ##p < 0.01, compared with group II.
Effect of Ginkgo leaf parenteral solution on enzymic antioxidants (SOD, CAT) in the blood and cochlea of control and experimental rats.
| Group | SOD | CAT | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Serum (U/mL) | Cochlea (U/mg protein) | Serum (U/mL) | Cochlea (U/mg protein) | |
| I | 254.1 ± 12.74 | 291.3 ± 12.43 | 102.64 ± 6.42 | 53.07 ± 2.18 |
| II | 121.9 ± 6.03 ** | 133.8 ± 11.21 ** | 35.49 ± 1.92 ** | 22.16 ± 1.05 ** |
| III | 184.8 ± 7.29 ## | 196.4 ± 12.41 ## | 57.21 ± 2.06 ## | 34.61 ± 1.74 ## |
| IV | 231.7 ± 11.05 ## | 277.5 ± 18.39 ## | 92.17 ± 3.94 ## | 49.52 ± 1.77 ## |
| V | 257.1 ± 15.9 ## | 300.5 ± 23.84 ## | 118.5 ± 9.04 ## | 52.73 ± 3.04 ## |
** p < 0.01, compared with group I; ##p < 0.01, compared with group II.
Effect of Ginkgo leaf parenteral solution on enzymic antioxidants (GSH-Px, GR) in the blood and cochlea of control and experimental rats.
| Group | GSH-Px | GR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Serum (U/mL) | Cochlea (U/mg protein) | Serum (U/mL) | Cochlea (U/mg protein) | |
| I | 48.82 ± 1.74 | 84.37 ± 6.09 | 21.18 ± 1.21 | 44.17 ± 1.88 |
| II | 18.52 ± 1.47 ** | 20.07 ± 1.67 ** | 10.37 ± 1.01 ** | 20.14 ± 1.53 ** |
| III | 32.74 ± 1.33 ## | 51.02 ± 3.83 ## | 15.66 ± 1.12 ## | 35.29 ± 1.52 ## |
| IV | 46.71 ± 2.07 ## | 70.75 ± 4.81 ## | 24.18 ± 0.08 ## | 40.81 ± 1.47 ## |
| V | 49.11 ± 3.21 ## | 80.53 ± 7.02 ## | 30.14 ± 1.53 ## | 45.29 ± 2.74 ## |
** p < 0.01, compared with group I; ##p < 0.01, compared with group II.
Effect of Ginkgo leaf parenteral solution on immunity indexs in cochlea of rats.
| Group | TNF-α (ng/mL) | IL-1β (ng/L) | IL-6 (ng/L) | IL-8 (ng/L) | IL-10 (ng/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | 2.52 ± 0.13 | 9.04 ± 0.52 | 69.52 ± 1.86 | 75.28 ± 3.11 | 6.07 ± 3.02 |
| II | 6.51 ± 0.32 ** | 21.63 ± 1.04 ** | 116.3 ± 5.82 ** | 177.42 ± 7.93 ** | 26.87 ± 1.52 ** |
| III | 4.83 ± 0.22 ## | 16.44 ± 0.89 ## | 89.74 ± 2.79 ## | 142.14 ± 8.83 ## | 30.51 ± 1.68 ## |
| IV | 2.99 ± 0.11 ## | 11.43 ± 0.08 ## | 72.18 ± 4.16 ## | 105.62 ± 7.27 ## | 34.17 ± 1.92 ## |
| V | 2.28 ± 0.09 ## | 10.27 ± 1.32 ## | 68.16 ± 3.81 ## | 84.29 ± 6.92 ## | 37.29 ± 2.51 ## |
** p < 0.01, compared with group I; ##p < 0.01, compared with group II.