Literature DB >> 22173174

High-grade prostatic adenocarcinoma present in a single biopsy core is associated with increased extraprostatic extension, seminal vesicle invasion, and positive surgical margins at prostatectomy.

Alcides Chaux1, Daniel A Fajardo, Nilda Gonzalez-Roibon, Alan W Partin, Mario Eisenberger, Theodore L DeWeese, George J Netto.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the pathologic outcome of prostate-specific antigen-screened patients with high-grade (Gleason score ≥ 8) prostate cancer limited to 1 biopsy core, without clinical evidence of disease.
METHODS: Ninety-two patients with only 1 biopsy core with cancer and treated by radical prostatectomy were divided into 4 groups according to the biopsy Gleason score: 3 + 3 = 6 (23 cases), 3 + 4 = 7 (25 cases), 4 + 3 = 7 (20 cases), and ≥ 8 (24 cases).
RESULTS: Cases with Gleason score ≥ 8 showed a significantly higher proportion of extraprostatic extension (50%), positive surgical margins (21%), and seminal vesicle invasion (12%) when compared with the other groups. Patients with Gleason score ≥ 8 in the biopsy had a 25-fold increased in the odds ratio for extraprostatic extension in the prostatectomy. The incidence of extraprostatic extension was higher in those with prostatic cancer involving ≥ 50% of one core (88%) compared with cases involving <50% (32%).
CONCLUSION: In patients with prostate cancer limited to 1 biopsy core, the presence of Gleason score ≥ 8 significantly increased the incidence of extraprostatic extension, positive surgical margins, and seminal vesicle invasion. The odds ratio was substantially higher in patients with ≥ 50% of Gleason ≥ 8 in the biopsy core. These data might be taken into account for proper clinical management of this set of patients.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22173174      PMCID: PMC3449144          DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.10.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  24 in total

1.  Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: general pathologist.

Authors:  W C Allsbrook; K A Mangold; M H Johnson; R B Lane; C G Lane; J I Epstein
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.466

2.  Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: urologic pathologists.

Authors:  W C Allsbrook; K A Mangold; M H Johnson; R B Lane; C G Lane; M B Amin; D G Bostwick; P A Humphrey; E C Jones; V E Reuter; W Sakr; I A Sesterhenn; P Troncoso; T M Wheeler; J I Epstein
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.466

3.  The value of mandatory second opinion pathology review of prostate needle biopsy interpretation before radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Fadi Brimo; Luciana Schultz; Jonathan I Epstein
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  The clinical significance of in-depth pathological assessment of extraprostatic extension and margin status in radical prostatectomies for prostate cancer.

Authors:  S M Chan; F J Garcia; J L Chin; M Moussa; M Y Gabril
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 5.554

5.  Predicting 15-year prostate cancer specific mortality after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Scott E Eggener; Peter T Scardino; Patrick C Walsh; Misop Han; Alan W Partin; Bruce J Trock; Zhaoyong Feng; David P Wood; James A Eastham; Ofer Yossepowitch; Danny M Rabah; Michael W Kattan; Changhong Yu; Eric A Klein; Andrew J Stephenson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-01-15       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy predict prostate cancer specific mortality.

Authors:  Jonathan L Wright; Bruce L Dalkin; Lawrence D True; William J Ellis; Janet L Stanford; Paul H Lange; Daniel W Lin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Clinical utility of the percentage of positive prostate biopsies in defining biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  A V D'Amico; R Whittington; S B Malkowicz; D Schultz; J Fondurulia; M H Chen; J E Tomaszewski; A A Renshaw; A Wein; J P Richie
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Interobserver variability in histologic evaluation of radical prostatectomy between central and local pathologists: findings of TAX 3501 multinational clinical trial.

Authors:  George J Netto; Mario Eisenberger; Jonathan I Epstein
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Prognostic significance of Gleason score 3+4 versus Gleason score 4+3 tumor at radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  T Y Chan; A W Partin; P C Walsh; J I Epstein
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  The percent of cores positive for cancer in prostate needle biopsy specimens is strongly predictive of tumor stage and volume at radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  T J Sebo; B J Bock; J C Cheville; C Lohse; P Wollan; H Zincke
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  4 in total

1.  Characteristics of modern Gleason 9/10 prostate adenocarcinoma: a single tertiary centre experience within the Republic of Ireland.

Authors:  F O'Kelly; S Elamin; A Cahill; P Aherne; J White; J Buckley; K N O'Regan; A Brady; D G Power; M F O'Brien; P Sweeney; N Mayer; P J Kelly
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Management of prostate cancer in port harcourt, Nigeria: changing patterns.

Authors:  On Ekeke; Oe Amusan; N Eke
Journal:  J West Afr Coll Surg       Date:  2012-07

3.  Clinical and oncologic findings of extraprostatic extension on needle biopsy in de novo metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jun-Ru Chen; Jin-Ge Zhao; Sha Zhu; Meng-Ni Zhang; Ni Chen; Jian-Dong Liu; Guang-Xi Sun; Peng-Fei Shen; Hao Zeng
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2020 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.285

4.  Up- and downgrading in single intermediate-risk positive biopsy core prostate cancer.

Authors:  Benedikt Hoeh; Rocco Flammia; Lukas Hohenhorst; Gabriele Sorce; Francesco Chierigo; Zhe Tian; Fred Saad; Michele Gallucci; Alberto Briganti; Carlo Terrone; Shahrokh F Shariat; Markus Graefen; Derya Tilki; Luis A Kluth; Philipp Mandel; Felix K H Chun; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2022-01-26
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.