Literature DB >> 22173172

Body mass index is associated with higher lymph node counts during retroperitoneal lymph node dissection.

R Houston Thompson1, Brett S Carver, George J Bosl, Dean Bajorin, Robert Motzer, Darren Feldman, Victor E Reuter, Joel Sheinfeld.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether body mass index (BMI) is associated with lymph node counts in patients treated with a primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND). Lymph node counts are a proposed measure of quality assurance for numerous malignancies. Investigation of patient factors associated with lymph node counts are lacking.
METHODS: Using the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Testis Cancer Database, we identified 255 patients treated with a primary RPLND for nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT) from 1999-2008. The associations between BMI and node counts were evaluated using linear regression models in univariate and multivariable models adjusting for features reported to predict higher node counts (year of surgery, stage, and surgeon volume).
RESULTS: Median BMI (IQR) was 26.1 (23.4-28.7) and median (IQR) total node count was 38 (27-53). Median total node count for patients with a BMI<25, 25 to 29, and ≥30 was 35, 42, and 44 nodes, respectively. In a univariate analysis, higher BMI was significantly associated with higher total node counts (coefficient 0.7 nodes for each 1-U increase in BMI; P=.026). Features associated with higher node count on multivariate analysis included high-volume surgeon (P=.047), pathologic stage (P=.017), more recent year of surgery (P<.001), and higher BMI (P=.009).
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest for the first time that BMI is independently associated with higher lymph node counts during a lymph node dissection. If confirmed by others, these results may be important when using lymph node counts as a surrogate for adequacy of a lymph node dissection.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22173172      PMCID: PMC4170790          DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.04.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  13 in total

Review 1.  Prognostic value of nodal ratios in node-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Wendy A Woodward; Vincent Vinh-Hung; Naoto T Ueno; Yee Chung Cheng; Melanie Royce; Patricia Tai; Georges Vlastos; Anne Marie Wallace; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Yago Nieto
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-06-20       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Standardization of pelvic lymphadenectomy performed at radical cystectomy: can we establish a minimum number of lymph nodes that should be removed?

Authors:  Theresa M Koppie; Andrew J Vickers; Kinjal Vora; Guido Dalbagni; Bernard H Bochner
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Association versus causation versus quality improvement: setting benchmarks for lymph node evaluation in colon cancer.

Authors:  Rocco Ricciardi; Nancy N Baxter
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Guidelines 2000 for colon and rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  H Nelson; N Petrelli; A Carlin; J Couture; J Fleshman; J Guillem; B Miedema; D Ota; D Sargent
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-04-18       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 5.  Lymph node evaluation and survival after curative resection of colon cancer: systematic review.

Authors:  George J Chang; Miguel A Rodriguez-Bigas; John M Skibber; Virginia A Moyer
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Staging of esophageal carcinoma: length of tumor and number of involved regional lymph nodes. Are these independent prognostic factors?

Authors:  Elfriede Bollschweiler; Stephan E Baldus; Wolfgang Schröder; Paul M Schneider; Arnulf H Hölscher
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2006-10-01       Impact factor: 3.454

7.  Impact of total lymph node count on staging and survival after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: data from a large US-population database.

Authors:  David D Smith; Rebecca R Schwarz; Roderich E Schwarz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Postoperative survival and the number of lymph nodes sampled during resection of node-negative non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Michelle S Ludwig; Michael Goodman; Daniel L Miller; Peter A S Johnstone
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  Contemporary lymph node counts during primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection.

Authors:  R Houston Thompson; Brett S Carver; George J Bosl; Dean Bajorin; Robert Motzer; Darren R Feldman; Victor E Reuter; Joel Sheinfeld
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Obesity influences outcome of sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Anna M Derossis; Jane V Fey; Hiram S Cody; Patrick I Borgen
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 6.113

View more
  3 in total

1.  Robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Cherynne Yuin Mun Johansson; Felix Kwok Hee Chan
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X       Date:  2020-09-06

2.  Body surface area as a novel risk factor for chylothorax complicating video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Shuangjiang Li; Yan Wang; Kun Zhou; Shan Cheng; Yanming Wu; Guowei Che
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 3.  Immunogenicity of Protein Therapeutics: A Lymph Node Perspective.

Authors:  Kristy Fu; Kylie March; Aikaterini Alexaki; Giulia Fabozzi; Eirini Moysi; Constantinos Petrovas
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 7.561

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.