Literature DB >> 22172904

Incidence of secondary cancer development after high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy and image-guided brachytherapy for the treatment of localized prostate cancer.

Michael J Zelefsky1, Douglas M Housman, Xin Pei, Zumre Alicikus, Juan Martin Magsanoc, Lawrence T Dauer, Jean St Germain, Yoshiya Yamada, Marisa Kollmeier, Brett Cox, Zhigang Zhang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report the incidence and excess risk of second malignancy (SM) development compared with the general population after external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and brachytherapy to treat prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1998 and 2001, 1,310 patients with localized prostate cancer were treated with EBRT (n = 897) or brachytherapy (n = 413). We compared the incidence of SMs in our patients with that of the general population extracted from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data set combined with the 2000 census data.
RESULTS: The 10-year likelihood of SM development was 25% after EBRT and 15% after brachytherapy (p = .02). The corresponding 10-year likelihood for in-field SM development in these groups was 4.9% and 1.6% (p = .24). Multivariate analysis showed that EBRT vs. brachytherapy and older age were the only significant predictors for the development of all SMs (p = .037 and p = .030), with a trend for older patients to develop a SM. The increased incidence of SM for EBRT patients was explained by the greater incidence of skin cancer outside the radiation field compared with that after brachytherapy (10.6% and 3.3%, respectively, p = .004). For the EBRT group, the 5- and 10-year mortality rate was 1.96% and 5.1% from out-of field cancer, respectively; for in-field SM, the corresponding mortality rates were 0.1% and 0.7%. Among the brachytherapy group, the 5- and 10-year mortality rate related to out-of field SM was 0.8% and 2.7%, respectively. Our observed SM rates after prostate RT were not significantly different from the cancer incidence rates in the general population.
CONCLUSIONS: Using modern sophisticated treatment techniques, we report low rates of in-field bladder and rectal SM risks after prostate cancer RT. Furthermore, the likelihood of mortality secondary to a SM was unusual. The greater rate of SM observed with EBRT vs. brachytherapy was related to a small, but significantly increased, number of skin cancers in the EBRT patients compared with that of the general population.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22172904     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.08.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  18 in total

1.  [Population-based analysis of complications after local therapy for prostate cancer. Prostatectomy versus radiotherapy].

Authors:  Michael J Eble
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  [Radiotherapy in the treatment of advanced and recurrent prostate cancer].

Authors:  D Böhmer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Hematuria following stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Marie K Gurka; Leonard N Chen; Aditi Bhagat; Rudy Moures; Joy S Kim; Thomas Yung; Siyuan Lei; Brian T Collins; Pranay Krishnan; Simeng Suy; Anatoly Dritschilo; John H Lynch; Sean P Collins
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 4.  Second primary cancers after radiation for prostate cancer: a systematic review of the clinical data and impact of treatment technique.

Authors:  Louise Murray; Ann Henry; Peter Hoskin; Frank-Andre Siebert; Jack Venselaar
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 6.280

5.  Incidence of second malignancies for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Mieke Van Hemelrijck; Anita Feller; Hans Garmo; Fabio Valeri; Dimitri Korol; Silvia Dehler; Sabine Rohrmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Long term outcome and side effects in patients receiving low-dose I125 brachytherapy: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Pieter Logghe; Rolf Verlinde; Frank Bouttens; Caroline Van den Broecke; Nathalie Deman; Koen Verboven; Dirk Maes; Luc Merckx
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.541

7.  Risk of second cancer following radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Nina-Sophie Hegemann; Anne Schlesinger-Raab; Ute Ganswindt; Claudia Hörl; Stephanie E Combs; Dieter Hölzel; Jürgen E Gschwend; Christian Stief; Claus Belka; Jutta Engel
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 8.  Second malignant neoplasms following radiotherapy.

Authors:  Sanath Kumar
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Radiotherapy-induced malignancies: review of clinical features, pathobiology, and evolving approaches for mitigating risk.

Authors:  Steve Braunstein; Jean L Nakamura
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 10.  Multidisciplinary approach to synchronous prostate and rectal cancer: current experience and future challenges.

Authors:  Charalampos Seretis; Fotios Seretis; Nikolaos Liakos
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2014-03-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.