Literature DB >> 22172012

The modulation of motor cortex excitability during motor imagery depends on imagery quality.

Florent Lebon1, Winston D Byblow, Christian Collet, Aymeric Guillot, Cathy M Stinear.   

Abstract

Motor imagery (MI) increases corticomotor excitability and modulates intracortical inhibition. This study aimed to relate these neurophysiological mechanisms to imagery quality. Twenty-three healthy adults participated. First, the ability to vividly and accurately imagine performing a finger-to-thumb opposition task was evaluated by calculating a MI index (MII) based on psychological, behavioural and psychophysiological measurements. These scores were used to distinguish good from poor imagers. Transcranial magnetic stimulation was then used to assess modulation of corticomotor excitability, short-interval intracortical inhibition (sICI) and short-interval intracortical facilitation (sICF). Participants imagined abduction of their right thumb paced by a 1-Hz metronome. Single and paired magnetic stimuli were delivered at rest, while listening to the metronome, and during or between imagined movements. Corticomotor excitability was facilitated in the right opponens pollicis for good and poor imagers during MI, and this was positively correlated to the MII score. Poor imagers also facilitated corticomotor excitability of the right abductor digiti minimi, which was not involved in the movement. No interactions were found with sICI and sICF for good imagers, whereas poor imagers recruited intracortical facilitation while imagining. Accurate MI performance was characterised by muscle-specific temporal modulation of corticomotor excitability.
© 2011 The Authors. European Journal of Neuroscience © 2011 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22172012     DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07938.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  33 in total

1.  Optimization of a motor learning attention-directing strategy based on an individual's motor imagery ability.

Authors:  Takeshi Sakurada; Masahiro Hirai; Eiju Watanabe
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Modulation of corticospinal excitability dependent upon imagined force level.

Authors:  Nobuaki Mizuguchi; Izumi Umehara; Hiroki Nakata; Kazuyuki Kanosue
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The influence of imagery capacity in motor performance improvement.

Authors:  Célia Ruffino; Charalambos Papaxanthis; Florent Lebon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Modulation of motor cortex inhibition during motor imagery.

Authors:  Benjamin W X Chong; Cathy M Stinear
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Resting-state functional connectivity and motor imagery brain activation.

Authors:  Catarina Saiote; Andrea Tacchino; Giampaolo Brichetto; Luca Roccatagliata; Giulia Bommarito; Christian Cordano; Mario Battaglia; Giovanni Luigi Mancardi; Matilde Inglese
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Motor imagery training: Kinesthetic imagery strategy and inferior parietal fMRI activation.

Authors:  Florent Lebon; Ulrike Horn; Martin Domin; Martin Lotze
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Differential effects of aging and physical activity on corticospinal excitability of upper and lower limb muscles.

Authors:  Vianney Rozand; Jonathon W Senefeld; Christopher W Sundberg; Ashleigh E Smith; Sandra K Hunter
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  The changes in spinal reciprocal inhibition during motor imagery in lower extremity.

Authors:  Hideto Nakayama; Michiyuki Kawakami; Yoko Takahashi; Kunitsugu Kondo; Eiji Shimizu
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 9.  Impact of neurologic deficits on motor imagery: a systematic review of clinical evaluations.

Authors:  Franck Di Rienzo; Christian Collet; Nady Hoyek; Aymeric Guillot
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 7.444

10.  Does sonification of action simulation training impact corticospinal excitability and audiomotor plasticity?

Authors:  Fabio Castro; Ladan Osman; Giovanni Di Pino; Aleksandra Vuckovic; Alexander Nowicky; Daniel Bishop
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.