Literature DB >> 22171317

Reduction in drop size of ophthalmic topical drop preparations and the impact of treatment.

Shiva Kumar1, Roopa Karki, Marreddy Meena, Tigari Prakash, Tanniru Rajeswari, Divakar Goli.   

Abstract

In this work we devised a method to create smaller eye drops of the glaucoma medication timolol maleate by altering the dropper tip design and changing the physical properties of the formulation. Most ocular diseases are treated with topical application of eye drops. After instillation of an eye drop, typically, less than 5% of the applied drug penetrates the cornea and reaches the intraocular tissues; the major fraction of the instilled drug is absorbed and enters the systemic circulation. Ophthalmic solutions are available in multidose or single-dose glass/plastic dropper bottles that deliver drops with a volume that ranges from 25 μL to 70 μL (average 40 μL). Because of the low capacity of the precorneal area, the optimal drop volume is about 20 μL; with larger volumes there is the risk of adverse systemic effects due to absorption of the drug via the nasal mucosa. Thus, both from the biopharmaceutical and economic point of view, drops of only 5-15 mL volume should be instilled into the eye. In this present work we devised a method to reduce the size of the drop by inserting a glass capillary tube into the dropper tip and by changing the physical properties of the formulation (by altering the concentration of Tween 80™, i.e., 0.05% and 0.1% of Tween 80™). We measured the drop sizes of the different timolol eye drop formulations available in the market and estimated the yearly cost of the medications. Our timolol maleate formulation with 0.1% concentration of Tween 80™ delivered through the dropper tip with the inserted glass capillary was shown to be better than the other formulations available in the market in terms of ability to deliver smaller drops, meaning that each bottle would last longer and that the yearly cost of treatment would be lower.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drop size; cost-effectiveness; eye drop; timolol maleate

Year:  2011        PMID: 22171317      PMCID: PMC3217709          DOI: 10.4103/2231-4040.85540

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Pharm Technol Res        ISSN: 0976-2094


INTRODUCTION

Glaucoma is defined as state of raised intraocular pressure is not compatible with the normal health and function of the eye.[1] The normal range of intraocular pressure is 12.0-21.0 mmHg. Glauoma is a common cause of blindness in adults. With early recognition, it can be treated by medication and surgery.[23] Pharmacokinetic studies have shown the maximal tear film concentration is achieved with a 20-μL eye drop.[4] Increasing the eye drop's size beyond this does not increase the drug concentration in the tear film. Therefore, reducing the eye drop's size from the presently available 50-70 μL to 20 μL should not reduce efficacy.[56] With smaller drop size, the number of bottles required per year will be less, and this may be particularly important for poor patients in whom compliance is often decided by the cost of treatment.[6-8] Besides the economic factors, there are important pharmacologic implications. The beta-blockade mechanism of timolol has resulted in a dramatic increase in serious complications due to eye drop-related timolol toxicity.[9] There is wide variability in the drop size of different products on the market and it would be worthwhile to devise a method to deliver an optimum drop size.[1011] Alterations in the eye drop delivery system to reduce drop size, as well as alteration of the physical properties of the medication, can greatly diminish the cost of treatment and also improve the therapeutic index. The ultimate aim of the present study was to reduce the cost of treatment by increasing the number of drops per bottle. We tried to accomplish this by increasing the surface active agents in the formulation and by changing the inner diameter of the dropper so that drop size was smaller.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Preparation of Eye Drop Solutions of Timolol Maleate, Using 0.05%v/v, 0.1v/v, and 0.5% of tween 80

For preparation of the eye drop solution, 680 mg of timolol maleate was accurately weighed and, along with 10 mg of benzalkonium chloride, was dissolved in 100 mL of buffer solution (pH 7.4).

Determination of Surface Tension and Viscosity of the Formulation

Surface tension was determined by using the drop count method and viscosity was determined using the Ostwald viscometer.

Drop Count of Different Formulation and for the Medication Before Inserting the Capillary

The drops were counted as they fell into a 10 mL graduated cylinder. The total volume of medication was measured in each container. In all the cases blank was carried out with 0.9% v/v sodium chloride solution. The same graduated cylinder was used for all the trials. All the samples under each brand name were obtained from the same batch. The plastic dropper tips used were of the same batch, the dropper number used for both formulations and medication was as follows: LDPE Plastic eye dropper, 5 mL container.

Alteration of the Tip Dimension of the Dropper using a Capillary Tube

The inner and outer diameters of the droppers were measured. Then the glass capillary tube was inserted and fixed to the dropper and checked for leakage [Table 1].
Table 1

Tip dimensions of eye dropper and capillary tube

Tip dimensions of eye dropper and capillary tube

Drop Count After Inserting the Glass Capillary Tube

The drops were counted as they fell into a 10-mL graduated measuring cylinder; the total volume of the medication was measured with 0.9%v/v sodium chloride solution. The same graduated cylinder was used for all the trials. All the samples name were obtained from the same batch under each branded name. The plastic dropper tips used were of the same batch, the dropper tip used were of the same batch, the dropper used for both formulations and medication was follows: LDPE dropper, 5 mL container [Table 2].
Table 2

Drop size, medicament required, cost for 1 year of timolol maleate for before and after inserting the capillary tube

Drop size, medicament required, cost for 1 year of timolol maleate for before and after inserting the capillary tube

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

A drop size greater than 25 μL will cause wastage of the medication and unnecessary expenses to the patient. Pharmacokinetic studies have shown that the maximal tear film concentration can be achieved with a drop of 20 μL. While increasing the eye drop's size beyond this does not increase efficacy, reducing the eye drop's size will decrease wastage. Before the capillary tube was inserted, the drop size varies, from 31.64 μL (formulation III) to 33.33 μL (formulation I). Drop size for the commercial preparations varies from 32.65 μL (Timolet™) to 38.68 μL (Timolen™). The medication requirement ranges from 8.52 bottles (formulation III) to 9.6 (formulation I); for the marketed formulations the range was from 9.18 bottles (Timolet™) to 10.26 (Ocutim™). The cost for one year ranges from Rs. 183.18 (formulation III) to Rs. 201.62 (formulation I) and, for the commercial preparations, from Rs. 264.23 (Glucotim™) to Rs. 393.66 (Glucomol™). After inserting the capillary, the drop size varies from 18.82 μL (formulation III) to 22.02 μL (formulation I) and, for the commercial prepatations, from 21.73 μL (Glucomol™) to 22.93 μL (Ocutim™). The medication requirement ranges from 5.52 bottles (formulation III) to 6.42 bottles (formulation I); for the commercial preparations the range was from 6.24 bottles (Glucomol™ and Iotim™) to 6.60 bottles (Ocutim™). The cost for 1 year ranges from Rs. 118.68 (formulation III) to Rs. 134.82 (formulation I) and, for the commercial preparations, from Rs. 178.38 (Glucotim™) to Rs. 269.84 (Timolet™). Thus, alteration of the eye drop delivery system and medication properties can produce smaller drops and can eatly decrease the cost of topical therapy in glaucoma and at the same time improve the therapeutic index.
  7 in total

1.  A comparison of capillary and rotational viscometry of aqueous solutions of hypromellose.

Authors:  Z Sklubalová; Z Zatloukal
Journal:  Pharmazie       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.267

2.  Drop size of commercial glaucoma medications.

Authors:  C M Lederer; R E Harold
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-06-15       Impact factor: 5.258

Review 3.  Pharmacokinetics of instilled drugs in the human eye.

Authors:  S Nagataki; S Mishima
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol Clin       Date:  1980

Review 4.  Factors influencing the penetration of topically applied drugs.

Authors:  D M Maurice
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol Clin       Date:  1980

5.  Treatment of glaucoma using minidrops of clonidine.

Authors:  G Petursson; R Cole; C Hanna
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-08

6.  Classification of plastic eye dropper tips using Harkins and Brown's factor.

Authors:  Z Sklubalová; Z Zatloukal
Journal:  Pharmazie       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.267

7.  Topically applied pilocarpine. Human pupillary response as a function of drop size.

Authors:  R R File; T F Patton
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1980-01
  7 in total
  14 in total

1.  Propranolol 0.1% eye micro-drops in newborns with retinopathy of prematurity: a pilot clinical trial.

Authors:  Luca Filippi; Giacomo Cavallaro; Paola Bagnoli; Massimo Dal Monte; Patrizio Fiorini; Elettra Berti; Letizia Padrini; Gianpaolo Donzelli; Gabriella Araimo; Gloria Cristofori; Monica Fumagalli; Giancarlo la Marca; Maria Luisa Della Bona; Roberta Pasqualetti; Pina Fortunato; Silvia Osnaghi; Barbara Tomasini; Maurizio Vanni; Anna Maria Calvani; Silvano Milani; Ivan Cortinovis; Alessandra Pugi; Massimo Agosti; Fabio Mosca
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 3.756

2.  Effect of Particle Size and Viscosity of Suspensions on Topical Ocular Bioavailability of Budesonide, a Corticosteroid.

Authors:  Sunil Vooturi; David Bourne; Jiban Jyoti Panda; Stephanie Choi; Hyewon Kim; Sarath K Yandrapu; Uday B Kompella
Journal:  J Ocul Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 2.850

3.  Cost Analysis of Commonly used Combination of Drugs in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma.

Authors:  Shivaprasad Kalakappa Kumbar; Mrutyunjay Mirje; Gurudatta Moharir; Ambadasu Bharatha
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-05-01

Review 4.  Principles of pharmacology in the eye.

Authors:  Sahar Awwad; Abeer H A Mohamed Ahmed; Garima Sharma; Jacob S Heng; Peng T Khaw; Steve Brocchini; Alastair Lockwood
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 8.739

5.  Cyclodextrin-polysaccharide-based, in situ-gelled system for ocular antifungal delivery.

Authors:  Anxo Fernández-Ferreiro; Noelia Fernández Bargiela; María Santiago Varela; Maria Gil Martínez; Maria Pardo; Antonio Piñeiro Ces; José Blanco Méndez; Miguel González Barcia; Maria Jesus Lamas; FranciscoJ Otero-Espinar
Journal:  Beilstein J Org Chem       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 2.883

6.  Clinical Evaluation of a Novel Electromechanical Topical Ocular Drug Delivery System: Two Phase 1 Proof of Concept Studies.

Authors:  Hugo Quiroz-Mercado; Ehud Ivri; Roberto Gonzalez-Salinas; Iraklis C Kourtis; Joseph Gilbert; José Francisco Pérez-Vázquez; Mark Blumenkranz; Jesús Jiménez-Román; George Marcellino
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-01-20

7.  New Preservative-Free Formulation for the Enhanced Ocular Bioavailability of Prostaglandin Analogues in Glaucoma.

Authors:  Gabriel Alviset; Yohann Corvis; Karim Hammad; Josiane Lemut; Marc Maury; Nathalie Mignet; Vincent Boudy
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-02-20       Impact factor: 6.321

8.  Effect of preserved and preservative-free timolol eye drops on tear film stability in healthy Africans.

Authors:  Alex Ilechie; Samuel Abokyi; Gifty Boateng; George Asumeng Koffuor
Journal:  Niger Med J       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr

9.  Comprehensive evaluation of formulation factors for ocular penetration of fluoroquinolones in rabbits using cassette dosing technique.

Authors:  Charu Sharma; Nihar R Biswas; Shreesh Ojha; Thirumurthy Velpandian
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 4.162

Review 10.  Development and Characterization of Nanoemulsions for Ophthalmic Applications: Role of Cationic Surfactants.

Authors:  Ana R Fernandes; Elena Sanchez-Lopez; Tiago Dos Santos; Maria L Garcia; Amelia M Silva; Eliana B Souto
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 3.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.