Literature DB >> 22170254

Gene amplification of ESR1 in breast cancers--fact or fiction? A fluorescence in situ hybridization and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification study.

Akishi Ooi1, Masafumi Inokuchi, Shinichi Harada, Johji Inazawa, Ryousuke Tajiri, Seiko Sawada- Kitamura, Hiroko Ikeda, Hiroko Kawashima, Yoh Dobashi.   

Abstract

Oestrogen receptor-alpha (ERα), encoded by the ESR1 gene located on 6q25, is a nuclear transcription factor. Since it was reported in 2007 that more than 20% of breast cancers show ESR1 gene amplification, there has been considerable controversy about its frequency and clinical significance. We set out to assess the frequency and levels of ESR1 amplification in breast cancers. In a total of 106 breast needle biopsy specimens examined by immunohistochemistry, 78 tumours contained more than 10% ERα-positive cancer cells. In fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis with an ESR1-specific probe, variously extended ESR1 signals were found in ERα-expressing cells. Some of these were indistinguishable from large clustered signals generally accepted to mean high-level gene amplification in homogeneously staining regions (HSRs), and could be considered to represent gene amplification. However, with RNase treatment, the 'HSR-like' signals changed to small compact signals, and are thus thought to represent concentrated RNA. FISH using two differently labelled probes corresponding to the non-overlapping 5'- and 3'-end portions of the ESR1 gene on touch smears showed a preserved spatial relationship of the 3' to 5' sequence of ESR1, therefore strongly suggesting that the RNA consisted of primary transcripts. Using touch smears obtained from 51 fresh tumours, precise enumeration of ESR1 signals with a correction by the number of centromere 6 on FISH after RNase A treatment revealed that three tumours (5.9%) had tumour cells with one to three additional copies of ESR1 as predominant subpopulations. This infrequent and low level of gene amplification of ESR1 was also detected as a 'gain' of the gene by analysis with multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA). The consistent results from immunohistochemistry, FISH, and MLPA in the present study settle the long-standing debate concerning gene amplification of ESR1 in breast carcinoma.
Copyright © 2012 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22170254     DOI: 10.1002/path.3974

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pathol        ISSN: 0022-3417            Impact factor:   7.996


  21 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of aromatase inhibitor resistance.

Authors:  Cynthia X Ma; Tomás Reinert; Izabela Chmielewska; Matthew J Ellis
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 60.716

2.  Absence of estrogen receptor alpha (ESR1) gene amplification in a series of breast cancers in Taiwan.

Authors:  Jim-Ray Chen; Tsan-Yu Hsieh; Huang-Yang Chen; Kun-Yan Yeh; Kuo-Su Chen; Yi-Che ChangChien; Mariann Pintye; Liang-Che Chang; Cheng-Cheng Hwang; Hui-Ping Chien; Yuan-Chun Hsu
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  Frequent ESR1 and CDK Pathway Copy-Number Alterations in Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Ahmed Basudan; Nolan Priedigkeit; Ryan J Hartmaier; Ethan S Sokol; Amir Bahreini; Rebecca J Watters; Michelle M Boisen; Rohit Bhargava; Kurt R Weiss; Maria M Karsten; Carsten Denkert; Jens-Uwe Blohmer; Jose P Leone; Ronald L Hamilton; Adam M Brufsky; Esther Elishaev; Peter C Lucas; Adrian V Lee; Steffi Oesterreich
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 5.852

4.  ESR1 gene status correlates with estrogen receptor protein levels measured by ligand binding assay and immunohistochemistry.

Authors:  Anne-Vibeke Laenkholm; Ann Knoop; Bent Ejlertsen; Tine Rudbeck; Maj-Britt Jensen; Sven Müller; Anne Elisabeth Lykkesfeldt; Birgitte Bruun Rasmussen; Kirsten Vang Nielsen
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 6.603

Review 5.  Drug resistance to targeted therapies: déjà vu all over again.

Authors:  Floris H Groenendijk; René Bernards
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 6.603

6.  Semi-comprehensive analysis of gene amplification in gastric cancers using multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Authors:  Akishi Ooi; Takeru Oyama; Ritsuko Nakamura; Ryosuke Tajiri; Hiroko Ikeda; Sachio Fushida; Hiroyuki Nakamura; Yoh Dobashi
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 7.  Estrogen receptor alpha gene amplification in breast cancer: 25 years of debate.

Authors:  Frederik Holst
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-04-10

8.  Utility of fluorescence in situ hybridization to detect MDM2 amplification in liposarcomas and their morphological mimics.

Authors:  Hiroaki Kimura; Yoh Dobashi; Takayuki Nojima; Hiroyuki Nakamura; Norio Yamamoto; Hiroyuki Tsuchiya; Hiroko Ikeda; Seiko Sawada-Kitamura; Takeru Oyama; Akishi Ooi
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2013-06-15

9.  Prognostic and predictive value of copy number alterations in invasive breast cancer as determined by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification.

Authors:  Sanaz Tabarestani; Sayyed Mohammad Hossein Ghaderian; Hamid Rezvani; Reza Mirfakhraie; Abdolali Ebrahimi; Hamid Attarian; Jahangir Rafat; Mojtaba Ghadyani; Hossein Afshin Alavi; Naser Kamalian; Afshin Rakhsha; Eznollah Azargashb
Journal:  Cell Oncol (Dordr)       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 6.730

10.  Co-active receptor tyrosine kinases mitigate the effect of FGFR inhibitors in FGFR1-amplified lung cancers with low FGFR1 protein expression.

Authors:  H Kotani; H Ebi; H Kitai; S Nanjo; K Kita; T G Huynh; A Ooi; A C Faber; M Mino-Kenudson; S Yano
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 9.867

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.