Literature DB >> 22169732

Skeletal differences in patients with temporomandibular joint disc displacement according to sagittal jaw relationship.

Il-Hyung Yang1, Beom-Seok Moon, Seung-Pyo Lee, Sug-Joon Ahn.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The present study was designed to analyze the skeletal differences in patients with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc displacement (DD), according to the sagittal jaw relationship.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We implemented a cross-sectional study design and enrolled a sample of Korean women older than age 17 years. The subjects were classified into 3 groups according to the magnetic resonance images of the bilateral TMJs: bilateral normal disc position (BN), bilateral disc displacement with reduction, and bilateral disc displacement without reduction. Each group was subdivided into 2 groups using the mandibular body length to anterior cranial base ratio as a sagittal jaw parameter: normal-size mandible (NM) and oversized mandible (OM). Seventeen variables from the lateral cephalograms were analyzed using 2-way analysis of variance to analyze the differences in skeletal characteristics with respect to the mandible size and TMJ DD status.
RESULTS: The subjects with TMJ DD generally had a short ramus height and clockwise rotation of the ramus and mandible compared with those with BN in both OM and NM groups. However, significant differences were present in the skeletal characteristics of the TMJ DD patients between the NM and OM groups. Significant backward positioning and rotation of the ramus and mandible were found between BN and bilateral disc displacement with reduction or bilateral disc displacement without reduction in the OM group, while those of the ramus and mandible were found between BN and bilateral disc displacement with reduction or bilateral disc displacement without reduction in the NM group.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study suggest that the skeletal characteristics associated with TMJ DD are differently represented according to the sagittal jaw relationship.
Copyright © 2012 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22169732     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.08.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  9 in total

1.  Posteroanterior cephalometric changes in subjects with temporomandibular joint disorders.

Authors:  O C Almăşan; M Băciuţ; M Hedeşiu; S Bran; H Almăşan; G Băciuţ
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Temporomandibular joint condylar changes following maxillomandibular advancement and articular disc repositioning.

Authors:  Joao Roberto Goncalves; Larry Miller Wolford; Daniel Serra Cassano; Guilherme da Porciuncula; Beatriz Paniagua; Lucia Helena Cevidanes
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.895

3.  Three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography based comparison of condylar position and morphology according to the vertical skeletal pattern.

Authors:  In-Young Park; Ji-Hyun Kim; Yang-Ho Park
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 1.372

Review 4.  Orthognathic surgery and temporomandibular joint symptoms.

Authors:  Hwi-Dong Jung; Sang Yoon Kim; Hyung-Sik Park; Young-Soo Jung
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2015-05-28

5.  Vertical Craniofacial Morphology and its Relation to Temporomandibular Disorders.

Authors:  Paula Furlan Bavia; Renata Cunha Matheus Rodrigues Garcia
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2016-06-30

6.  Changes of temporomandibular joint position after surgery first orthognathic treatment concept.

Authors:  Daniel Holzinger; Katrin Willinger; Gabriele Millesi; Kurt Schicho; Elisabeth Breuss; Florian Wagner; Rudolf Seemann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Lateral Cephalometric Analytical Uses for Temporomandibular Joint Disorders: The Importance of Cervical Posture and Hyoid Position.

Authors:  Horia Opris; Mihaela Baciut; Simion Bran; Florin Onisor; Oana Almasan; Avram Manea; Tiberiu Tamas; Sebastian Stoia; Armencea Gabriel; Grigore Baciut; Bogdan Crisan; Mihaela Hedesiu; Liana Crisan; Ioan Barbur; Daiana Opris; Cristian Dinu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-04       Impact factor: 4.614

8.  Temporomandibular joint morphology in Korean using cone-beam computed tomography: influence of age and gender.

Authors:  Ji-Min Yun; Young-Jun Choi; Su-Heon Woo; Ui-Lyong Lee
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2021-07-05

9.  Skeletal Divergence and Condylar Asymmetry in Patients with Temporomandibular Disorders (TMD): A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Maria Francesca Sfondrini; Letizia Bolognesi; Mario Bosco; Paola Gandini; Andrea Scribante
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 3.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.