Julius Sim1, Martyn Lewis. 1. Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK. j.sim@keele.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate methods to determine the size of a pilot study to inform a power calculation for a randomized controlled trial (RCT) using an interval/ratio outcome measure. STUDY DESIGN: Calculations based on confidence intervals (CIs) for the sample standard deviation (SD). RESULTS: Based on CIs for the sample SD, methods are demonstrated whereby (1) the observed SD can be adjusted to secure the desired level of statistical power in the main study with a specified level of confidence; (2) the sample for the main study, if calculated using the observed SD, can be adjusted, again to obtain the desired level of statistical power in the main study; (3) the power of the main study can be calculated for the situation in which the SD in the pilot study proves to be an underestimate of the true SD; and (4) an "efficient" pilot size can be determined to minimize the combined size of the pilot and main RCT. CONCLUSION: Trialists should calculate the appropriate size of a pilot study, just as they should the size of the main RCT, taking into account the twin needs to demonstrate efficiency in terms of recruitment and to produce precise estimates of treatment effect.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate methods to determine the size of a pilot study to inform a power calculation for a randomized controlled trial (RCT) using an interval/ratio outcome measure. STUDY DESIGN: Calculations based on confidence intervals (CIs) for the sample standard deviation (SD). RESULTS: Based on CIs for the sample SD, methods are demonstrated whereby (1) the observed SD can be adjusted to secure the desired level of statistical power in the main study with a specified level of confidence; (2) the sample for the main study, if calculated using the observed SD, can be adjusted, again to obtain the desired level of statistical power in the main study; (3) the power of the main study can be calculated for the situation in which the SD in the pilot study proves to be an underestimate of the true SD; and (4) an "efficient" pilot size can be determined to minimize the combined size of the pilot and main RCT. CONCLUSION: Trialists should calculate the appropriate size of a pilot study, just as they should the size of the main RCT, taking into account the twin needs to demonstrate efficiency in terms of recruitment and to produce precise estimates of treatment effect.
Authors: Lucy Beishon; Rachel Evley; Ronney B Panerai; Hari Subramaniam; Elizabeta Mukaetova-Ladinska; Thompson Robinson; Victoria Haunton Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-05-22 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: V Tsianakas; G Robert; A Richardson; R Verity; C Oakley; T Murrells; M Flynn; E Ream Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2015-03-06 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Matthew J Mimiaga; Beena Thomas; Katie Biello; Blake E Johnson; Soumya Swaminathan; Pandiyaraja Navakodi; S Balaguru; A Dhanalakshmi; Elizabeth F Closson; Sunil Menon; Conall O'Cleirigh; Kenneth H Mayer; Steven A Safren Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2017-11
Authors: Kara K Hoppe; Makeba Williams; Nicole Thomas; Julia B Zella; Anna Drewry; KyungMann Kim; Thomas Havighurst; Heather M Johnson Journal: Pregnancy Hypertens Date: 2018-12-31 Impact factor: 2.899
Authors: Grigorios Kotronoulas; Constantina Papadopoulou; Mhairi F Simpson; John McPhelim; Lynn Mack; Roma Maguire Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-05-19 Impact factor: 3.603