Literature DB >> 22168278

Treatment of cervical esophageal perforation caused by foreign bodies.

J Jiang1, T Yu, Y F Zhang, J Y Li, L Yang.   

Abstract

In this article, we reviewed our experience of treatment of cervical esophageal perforation caused by foreign bodies. Between 1980 and 2010, 42 patients were included in this study. There were 18 women and 24 men with a median age of 54 years. We divided the patients into three groups: the patients whose foreign bodies could not be extracted by otolaryngologists using endoscope (n= 7), the patients who had some signs of abscess formation but the foreign bodies had been extracted using endoscope (n= 25), and the patients who had no signs of abscess formation and the foreign bodies had been extracted (n= 10). We treated the patients of the three groups with surgical treatment, drainage alone, and conservative treatment, respectively. The outcome of the current series was favorable. Our experience suggested that most of the cases can be treated conservatively or by drainage alone. If the foreign bodies of the esophagus could not be extracted using endoscope, surgical treatment including the removal of the foreign bodies, primary repair, and drainage should be performed.
© 2011 Copyright the Authors. Journal compilation © 2011, Wiley Periodicals, Inc. and the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22168278     DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2011.01296.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   3.429


  7 in total

Review 1.  Food bolus and oesophageal foreign body: a summary of the evidence and proposed management process.

Authors:  Thomas J Stubington; Tawakir Kamani
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  Current treatment and outcome of esophageal perforations in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of 75 studies.

Authors:  Fausto Biancari; Vito D'Andrea; Rosalba Paone; Carlo Di Marco; Grazia Savino; Vesa Koivukangas; Juha Saarnio; Ersilia Lucenteforte
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Esophageal emergencies: WSES guidelines.

Authors:  Mircea Chirica; Michael D Kelly; Stefano Siboni; Alberto Aiolfi; Carlo Galdino Riva; Emanuele Asti; Davide Ferrari; Ari Leppäniemi; Richard P G Ten Broek; Pierre Yves Brichon; Yoram Kluger; Gustavo Pereira Fraga; Gil Frey; Nelson Adami Andreollo; Federico Coccolini; Cristina Frattini; Ernest E Moore; Osvaldo Chiara; Salomone Di Saverio; Massimo Sartelli; Dieter Weber; Luca Ansaloni; Walter Biffl; Helene Corte; Imtaz Wani; Gianluca Baiocchi; Pierre Cattan; Fausto Catena; Luigi Bonavina
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Current treatment and outcome of esophageal perforation: A single-center experience and a pooled analysis.

Authors:  Yufeng Deng; Luqi Hou; Dianyue Qin; Ting Huang; Tianzhu Yuan
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  Emergency management of jujube pit esophageal impactions using rigid esophagoscopy in the aged.

Authors:  Xingmei Wei; Jie Wang; Wen Xu
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-10-16

6.  Aerodigestive foreign bodies in adult ethiopian patients: a prospective study at tikur anbessa hospital, ethiopia.

Authors:  Abebe Bekele
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-04-15

7.  Safety and Efficacy of Nonoperative Treatment in Esophageal Perforation Caused by Foreign Bodies.

Authors:  Foqiang Liao; Zhenhua Zhu; Xiaolin Pan; Bimin Li; Yin Zhu; Youxiang Chen; Xu Shu
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 4.396

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.