Anita Garas1, Péter Vargha, Gábor Holló. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary. quaranta@med.unibs.it
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare sensitivity and specificity of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT) measurements made using RTVue-100 Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography (RTVue-OCT) and scanning laser polarimetry with variable (GDx-VCC) or enhanced compensation (GDx-ECC). METHODS: One eye of each of 177 consecutive patients was imaged. Healthy (n=50) and ocular hypertensive (n = 28) eyes were defined as structurally undamaged, preperimetric (n=33) and perimetric (n=66) glaucoma eyes as diseased. RESULTS: For average RNFLT, sensitivity was higher (χ(2) test, p=0.002) with RTVue-OCT (65.7%) than with GDx-VCC (49.5%). For superior and inferior RNFLT, sensitivity was similar with all methods. For the different nerve fiber bundle parameters, sensitivity of RTVue-OCT (64.6% to 84.8%) was consistently up to 35% higher (p<0.001) than that of GDx-VCC/ECC (28.3% to 72.7%). Specificity ranged from 84.6% to 98.7% with RTVue-OCT, 92.3% to 100% with GDx-VCC, and 94.9% to 100% with GDx-ECC, with no significant difference between the methods except for one nerve fiber bundle parameter, for which RTVue-OCT was less specific than either GDx method (p ≤ 0.004). Diagnostic accuracy of the GDx-VCC/ECC nerve fiber indicator (NFI) and RTVue-OCT average RNFLT were similar. Of the detected glaucoma cases, 87.7% were identified both by GDx-VCC/ECC NFI and average RNFLT of RTVue-OCT. CONCLUSIONS: In this clinical setting, all methods were similarly highly specific, but for localized RNFLT damage RTVue-OCT was statistically and clinically significantly more sensitive than GDx-VCC and GDx-ECC. Most detected glaucoma cases were identified with all 3 methods.
PURPOSE: To compare sensitivity and specificity of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT) measurements made using RTVue-100 Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography (RTVue-OCT) and scanning laser polarimetry with variable (GDx-VCC) or enhanced compensation (GDx-ECC). METHODS: One eye of each of 177 consecutive patients was imaged. Healthy (n=50) and ocular hypertensive (n = 28) eyes were defined as structurally undamaged, preperimetric (n=33) and perimetric (n=66) glaucoma eyes as diseased. RESULTS: For average RNFLT, sensitivity was higher (χ(2) test, p=0.002) with RTVue-OCT (65.7%) than with GDx-VCC (49.5%). For superior and inferior RNFLT, sensitivity was similar with all methods. For the different nerve fiber bundle parameters, sensitivity of RTVue-OCT (64.6% to 84.8%) was consistently up to 35% higher (p<0.001) than that of GDx-VCC/ECC (28.3% to 72.7%). Specificity ranged from 84.6% to 98.7% with RTVue-OCT, 92.3% to 100% with GDx-VCC, and 94.9% to 100% with GDx-ECC, with no significant difference between the methods except for one nerve fiber bundle parameter, for which RTVue-OCT was less specific than either GDx method (p ≤ 0.004). Diagnostic accuracy of the GDx-VCC/ECC nerve fiber indicator (NFI) and RTVue-OCT average RNFLT were similar. Of the detected glaucoma cases, 87.7% were identified both by GDx-VCC/ECC NFI and average RNFLT of RTVue-OCT. CONCLUSIONS: In this clinical setting, all methods were similarly highly specific, but for localized RNFLT damage RTVue-OCT was statistically and clinically significantly more sensitive than GDx-VCC and GDx-ECC. Most detected glaucoma cases were identified with all 3 methods.
Authors: H L Rao; R K Yadav; U K Addepalli; S Chaudhary; S Senthil; N S Choudhari; C S Garudadri Journal: Eye (Lond) Date: 2014-03-07 Impact factor: 3.775
Authors: Liang Liu; Yali Jia; Hana L Takusagawa; Alex D Pechauer; Beth Edmunds; Lorinna Lombardi; Ellen Davis; John C Morrison; David Huang Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Harsha L Rao; Ravi K Yadav; Uday K Addepalli; Shashikant Chaudhary; Sirisha Senthil; Nikhil S Choudhari; Chandra S Garudadri Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-10-03 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Katie Banister; Charles Boachie; Rupert Bourne; Jonathan Cook; Jennifer M Burr; Craig Ramsay; David Garway-Heath; Joanne Gray; Peter McMeekin; Rodolfo Hernández; Augusto Azuara-Blanco Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2016-03-23 Impact factor: 12.079