Literature DB >> 22167423

Evaluation of bone heating, immediate bone cell viability, and wear of high-resistance drills after the creation of implant osteotomies in rabbit tibias.

Abrahão Cavalcante Gomes de Souza Carvalho1, Thallita Pereira Queiroz, Roberto Okamoto, Rogerio Margonar, Idelmo Rangel Garcia, Osvaldo Magro Filho.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of reusing high-resistance drills on bone heating, immediate bone cell viability, and drill wear after performing implant osteotomies in rabbit tibias.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred sequential implant osteotomies were created in the superior tibial cortex of 12 White male rabbits. Six groups were established (G1 to G6) according to the number of osteotomies performed with each drill (0, 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50). Drilling began with a spear drill, followed by 2.0-mm, 2.8-mm, 3.0-mm, and 3.15-mm helical drills. The receptor beds were collected for immunohistochemical analysis, thermal changes were quantified, and the drills were subjected to scanning electron microscopy analysis.
RESULTS: A high degree of correlation between drill wear and number of osteotomies was observed (Pearson correlation coefficient, r = 0.984). Spear drills underwent twice as much deformation as helical drills. The bone heating analysis concluded that there was no statistically significant relationship between the number of osteotomies and bone heating (P > .05), but there were greater thermal changes during drilling with the spear drill than during drilling with helical drills (ratio 3:1). Immunohistochemical analysis showed a physiologic balance of osteoprotegerin and RANKL (receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand) immunolabeling in all groups; however, there was greater immunolabeling of all proteins in group G6 (50 osteotomies).
CONCLUSIONS: The tested drills did not cause significant bone heating after being reused 50 times; however, they caused more tissue trauma in the 50th osteotomy. Worn drills that are reused may be expected to cause excessive damage to the bone tissue and could adversely affect the osseointegration process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22167423

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  13 in total

1.  Study of temperature variation in cortical bone during osteotomies with trephine drills.

Authors:  Sergio Alexandre Gehrke; Marcelo Khoury Pazetto; Sérgio de Oliveira; Stefano Corbella; Silvio Taschieri; Fábio E C Mardegan
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  Heat generated by dental implant drills during osteotomy-a review: heat generated by dental implant drills.

Authors:  Sunil Kumar Mishra; Ramesh Chowdhary
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2014-02-18

3.  Biophysical regulation of osteotomy healing: An animal study.

Authors:  Liao Wang; Maziar Aghvami; John Brunski; Jill Helms
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.932

4.  The effect of simplifying dental implant drilling sequence on osseointegration: an experimental study in dogs.

Authors:  Gabriela Giro; Nick Tovar; Charles Marin; Estevam A Bonfante; Ryo Jimbo; Marcelo Suzuki; Malvin N Janal; Paulo G Coelho
Journal:  Int J Biomater       Date:  2013-01-30

5.  Refixation of Osteochondral Fractures by an Ultrasound-Activated Pin System - An Ovine In Vivo Examination Using CT and Scanning Electron Microscope.

Authors:  Neumann H; Schulz A P; Breer S; Unger A; Kienast B
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2015-01-31

6.  The effect of low-speed drilling without irrigation on heat generation: an experimental study.

Authors:  Ji-Hyeon Oh; Yiqin Fang; Seung-Mi Jeong; Byung-Ho Choi
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-02-15

7.  The effects of irrigation volume to the heat generation during implant surgery.

Authors:  A Sindel; Ö Dereci; M Hatipoğlu; M-A Altay; Ö Özalp; A Öztürk
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2017-07-01

8.  Can changes in implant macrogeometry accelerate the osseointegration process?: An in vivo experimental biomechanical and histological evaluations.

Authors:  Sergio Alexandre Gehrke; Jaime Aramburú; Leticia Pérez-Díaz; Tales Dias do Prado; Berenice Anina Dedavid; Patricia Mazon; Piedad N De Aza
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Temperature Values Variability in Piezoelectric Implant Site Preparation: Differences between Cortical and Corticocancellous Bovine Bone.

Authors:  Luca Lamazza; Girolamo Garreffa; Domenica Laurito; Marco Lollobrigida; Luigi Palmieri; Alberto De Biase
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Evaluation of bone substitutes for treatment of peri-implant bone defects: biomechanical, histological, and immunohistochemical analyses in the rabbit tibia.

Authors:  Pâmela Letícia Dos Santos; Rafael Scaf de Molon; Thallita Pereira Queiroz; Roberta Okamoto; Ana Paula de Souza Faloni; Jéssica Lemos Gulinelli; Eloá Rodrigues Luvizuto; Idelmo Rangel Garcia
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 2.614

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.