Literature DB >> 22167421

Comparison of strains for splinted and nonsplinted screw-retained prostheses on short implants.

Burak Yilmaz1, Jeremy D Seidt, Edwin A McGlumphy, Nancy L Clelland.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Because the evidence regarding the efficacy of splinting short implants on strain distribution is limited, this study aimed to measure and compare the strains generated by splinted and nonsplinted screw-retained implant crowns for short implants with internal connections.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Computed tomographic scan data of a patient missing all mandibular molar teeth were digitized using a software program, and stereolithography was then used to produce an acrylic resin cast. Two 4- x 6-mm implants were placed in the left side. One set of splinted crowns and one set of nonsplinted crowns were made to fit the two implants using screw retention. Three-dimensional image correlation was used for full-field measurement of strains and provided a synchronized stereo view of the cast during the experiment. Cameras recorded changes in random dot patterns that had been applied to the surface of the cast as the prostheses were loaded up to 400 N in vertical and oblique directions using a universal testing machine. Testing was repeated three times for splinted and nonsplinted crowns. An image correlation algorithm used the dot pattern to define correlation areas. Coordinates of these areas were determined for each recorded photograph and used to calculate the strains. Strain distribution data were compared for maximum and minimum principal strains.
RESULTS: Qualitative data showed evidence of increased load sharing for splinted, screw-retained prostheses regardless of the direction of the load applied. However, the only statistically significant difference between the two prosthesis types occurred for peak maximum principal strain under oblique loading.
CONCLUSIONS: Splinting short implants may provide a more even strain distribution during functional loading. Clinical corroboration of these findings is needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22167421

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  5 in total

Review 1.  Short Implants: New Horizon in Implant Dentistry.

Authors:  Neha Jain; Manisha Gulati; Meenu Garg; Chetan Pathak
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-09-01

2.  Stress distribution of various designs of prostheses on short implants or standard implants in posterior maxilla: a three dimensional finite element analysis.

Authors:  K Jomjunyong; P Rungsiyakull; C Rungsiyakull; W Aunmeungtong; M Chantaramungkorn; P Khongkhunthian
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2017-01-21

3.  A comparison of peri-implant strain generated by different types of implant supported prostheses.

Authors:  Ipsha Rani; Jayakar Shetty; Vahini Reddy
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

4.  A retrospective clinical study of single short implants (less than 8 mm) in posterior edentulous areas.

Authors:  Sang-Yun Kim; Jeong-Kui Ku; Hyun-Suk Kim; Pil-Young Yun; Young-Kyun Kim
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 1.904

5.  Retrospective cohort study of 4,591 dental implants: Analysis of risk indicators for bone loss and prevalence of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis.

Authors:  David French; H Michelle Grandin; Ronen Ofec
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 6.993

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.