Literature DB >> 22167296

Walking a tightrope: oncologists' perspective on providing information to women with recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC) during the medical encounter.

Laurie Elit1, Cathy Charles, Amiram Gafni, Jennifer Ranford, Sara Tedford Gold, Irving Gold.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Women with ovarian cancer (OC) must make treatment decisions. The first step in this process involves information giving about potential management choices. In this study, our objectives were to (1) describe the key issues that are reviewed by the oncologist when a woman presents with recurrent OC and (2) understand the extent to which physicians have different methods of giving information to patients.
METHODS: A descriptive qualitative study of 19 gynecologic and medical oncologists in Ontario, Canada was undertaken using a semi-structured interview guide.
RESULTS: Oncologists felt that the process of information giving was an important part of the medical encounter. The main themes that emerged from our data were (1) Oncologists varied in their approach to giving information about the disease and management; (2) oncologists felt that giving management choices to the patients helped engage patients in dealing with their disease and moving forward; (3) oncologists felt it was important to foster patient's hope; and (4) oncologists struggled with how much clinical outcome information to give to patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Oncologists tried to achieve a difficult balance between providing patients with several management choices in order to help them keep hope alive and providing them with realistic clinical information suggesting poor patient outcomes. Areas for future research include exploring (1) how physicians can best walk this tightrope of information giving, (2) how to assess physician "success" in doing so, and (3) the meaning of fostering hope to patients and physicians in the context of treatment decision making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22167296     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-011-1344-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  4 in total

Review 1.  Four models of the physician-patient relationship.

Authors:  E J Emanuel; L L Emanuel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992 Apr 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Policy and practice developments in the implementation of shared decision making: an international perspective.

Authors:  Martin Härter; Trudy van der Weijden; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes       Date:  2011-05-04

3.  It's a choice to move forward: women's perceptions about treatment decision making in recurrent ovarian cancer.

Authors:  L Elit; C Charles; S Dimitry; S Tedford-Gold; A Gafni; I Gold; T Whelan
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.894

4.  Optimal chemotherapy treatment for women with recurrent ovarian cancer.

Authors:  M Fung-Kee-Fung; T Oliver; L Elit; A Oza; H W Hirte; P Bryson
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.677

  4 in total
  5 in total

1.  Relationships between personal attitudes about death and communication with terminally ill patients: How oncology clinicians grapple with mortality.

Authors:  Rachel A Rodenbach; Kyle E Rodenbach; Mohamedtaki A Tejani; Ronald M Epstein
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2015-10-23

2.  A qualitative study of patient and clinician attitudes regarding surveillance after a resection of pancreatic and peri-ampullary cancer.

Authors:  Raymond G Deobald; Eva S W Cheng; Yoo-Joung Ko; Frances C Wright; Paul J Karanicolas
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 3.647

3.  How oncologists communicate information to women with recurrent ovarian cancer in the context of treatment decision making in the medical encounter.

Authors:  Lorraine M Elit; Cathy Charles; Amiram Gafni; Jennifer Ranford; Sara Tedford-Gold; Irving Gold
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Patients' Preferences for Information About the Benefits and Risks of Second-Line Palliative Chemotherapy and Their Oncologist's Awareness of These Preferences.

Authors:  Linda J M Oostendorp; Petronella B Ottevanger; Agnes J van de Wouw; Aafke H Honkoop; Maartje Los; Winette T A van der Graaf; Peep F M Stalmeier
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Patients' information needs and attitudes about post-treatment surveillance for colorectal cancer in the United States: a multi-perspective, mixed methods study.

Authors:  Lisa M Lowenstein; Robert J Volk; Amanda Cuddy; Andrea P Hempstead; Y Nancy You; Katherine Van Loon; Stefanos Millas; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Patrick Gavin; George J Chang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.