Literature DB >> 22166806

When and how should new technology be introduced into the IVF laboratory?

Joyce Harper1, M Cristina Magli, Kersti Lundin, Christopher L R Barratt, Daniel Brison.   

Abstract

There are many examples in assisted reproduction technology, where new technology and methods have been introduced into the clinical setting without appropriate development and evidence-based medicine to show that the procedure is safe and beneficial to the patient. Examples include preimplantation genetic screening, assisted hatching, in vitro maturation, blastocyst transfer and vitrification. Changes to culture media composition, stimulation regimes and laboratory protocols are also often established internationally without adequate validation. More recently, novel equipment that needs to be validated before it enters routine clinical use is being developed for IVF. With technologies such as producing gametes from stem cells around the corner, it is vital to ensure that the necessary research and development is conducted before bringing new techniques into clinical practice. Ideally, this should include preliminary work on animal models, such as mice/rats/rabbits/larger mammals, followed by studies on human embryos donated for research and finally well-designed RCTs with a follow up of all children born from the procedure. If such preliminary studies are not performed and published, it is possible that technology bringing no clinical benefit or leading to adverse health outcomes in the children born by these practices may be introduced. All IVF clinics need to consider the safety and efficacy of new technologies before introducing them.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22166806     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/der414

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  40 in total

1.  A randomized clinical trial comparing embryo culture in a conventional incubator with a time-lapse incubator.

Authors:  Kirstine Kirkegaard; Johnny Juhl Hindkjaer; Marie Louise Grøndahl; Ulrik Schiøler Kesmodel; Hans Jakob Ingerslev
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Time-lapse systems for embryo incubation and assessment in assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Sarah Armstrong; Priya Bhide; Vanessa Jordan; Allan Pacey; Jane Marjoribanks; Cindy Farquhar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-05-29

Review 3.  Are computational applications the "crystal ball" in the IVF laboratory? The evolution from mathematics to artificial intelligence.

Authors:  Mara Simopoulou; Konstantinos Sfakianoudis; Evangelos Maziotis; Nikolaos Antoniou; Anna Rapani; George Anifandis; Panagiotis Bakas; Stamatis Bolaris; Agni Pantou; Konstantinos Pantos; Michael Koutsilieris
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  The first 50 live births after autologous oocyte vitrification in France.

Authors:  Any Beltran Anzola; Vanessa Pauly; Cendrine Geoffroy-Siraudin; Marie-José Gervoise-Boyer; Debbie Montjean; Pierre Boyer
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Preimplantation genetic screening-23 years to navigate and translate into the clinical arena. We need a new roadmap!

Authors:  Christopher L R Barratt
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 4.025

Review 6.  Microfluidic Systems for Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Advantages and Potential Applications.

Authors:  Russel C Sequeira; Tracy Criswell; Anthony Atala; James J Yoo
Journal:  Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 4.169

Review 7.  Considerations Regarding Embryo Culture Conditions: From Media to Epigenetics.

Authors:  Mara Simopoulou; Konstantinos Sfakianoudis; Anna Rapani; Polina Giannelou; George Anifandis; Stamatis Bolaris; Agni Pantou; Maria Lambropoulou; Athanasios Pappas; Efthimios Deligeoroglou; Konstantinos Pantos; Michael Koutsilieris
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2018 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.155

8.  Using the Eeva Test™ adjunctively to traditional day 3 morphology is informative for consistent embryo assessment within a panel of embryologists with diverse experience.

Authors:  Michael P Diamond; Vaishali Suraj; Erica J Behnke; Xinli Yang; Marlane J Angle; Jaclyn C Lambe-Steinmiller; Rachel Watterson; Kelly Athayde Wirka; Alice A Chen; Shehua Shen
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 9.  Biomarkers identified with time-lapse imaging: discovery, validation, and practical application.

Authors:  Alice A Chen; Lei Tan; Vaishali Suraj; Renee Reijo Pera; Shehua Shen
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Comparison of the development of human embryos cultured in either an EmbryoScope or benchtop incubator.

Authors:  R Sciorio; J K Thong; S J Pickering
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.