Literature DB >> 22164156

Effects of Intra-Arterial and Intravenous Iso-Osmolar Contrast Medium (Iodixanol) on the Risk of Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury: A Meta-Analysis.

Peter A McCullough1, Jeremiah R Brown.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The iso-osmolar contrast agent iodixanol may be associated with a lower incidence of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) than low-osmolar contrast media (LOCM), but previous meta-analyses have yielded mixed results.
Objectives: To compare the incidence of CI-AKI between iodixanol and LOCM.
METHODS: Studies were identified from literature searches to December 2009, clinicaltrials.gov, and conference abstracts from the past 2 years including 2010. Only prospective, randomized comparisons between iodixanol and LOCM with CI-AKI [increase in serum creatinine (sCr) ≥0.5 mg/dl or ≥25% from baseline, as defined in the trial] as a primary and/or secondary endpoint and a Jadad score ≥2 were included. A random-effects model was used to obtain pooled relative risks (RRs) for CI-AKI in analyses based on route of administration [intra-arterial (IA) or intravenous (IV)], definition of CI-AKI, and timing of sCr measurements.
RESULTS: 145 potential articles were identified, of which 25 were included in the meta-analysis. Following IA administration (n = 19), the RR for CI-AKI (≥0.5 mg/dl definition) with iodixanol, compared with LOCM, was 0.462 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.272-0.786, p = 0.004, 15 studies]. Using the ≥25% definition, there was a lower incidence of CI-AKI with iodixanol versus LOCM, but the difference was not statistically significant (RR: 0.577, 95% CI: 0.297-1.12, p = 0.104, 11 studies). In the IV trials, there was no significant difference in the incidence of CI-AKI using either definition (≥0.5 mg/dl definition: RR: 0.967, 95% CI: 0.188-4.972, p = 0.968, 3 trials; ≥25% definition: RR: 0.656, 95% CI: 0.316-1.360, p = 0.257, 4 trials).
CONCLUSIONS: IA but not IV administration of iodixanol is associated with a significantly lower risk of CI-AKI than LOCM.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22164156      PMCID: PMC3222111          DOI: 10.1159/000332384

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiorenal Med        ISSN: 1664-5502            Impact factor:   2.041


  47 in total

1.  Re: contrast-induced nephropathy: are there differences between low osmolar and iso-osmolar iodinated contrast media?

Authors:  M O Downes; A Nicholson
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 2.350

Review 2.  Risk prediction of contrast-induced nephropathy.

Authors:  Peter A McCullough; Andy Adam; Christoph R Becker; Charles Davidson; Norbert Lameire; Fulvio Stacul; James Tumlin
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2006-02-23       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 3.  Contrast-induced nephropathy: how it develops, how to prevent it.

Authors:  Michael R Rudnick; Aaron Kesselheim; Stanley Goldfarb
Journal:  Cleve Clin J Med       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.321

4.  Contrast-induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary interventions in relation to chronic kidney disease and hemodynamic variables.

Authors:  George Dangas; Ioannis Iakovou; Eugenia Nikolsky; Eve D Aymong; Gary S Mintz; Nicholas N Kipshidze; Alexandra J Lansky; Issam Moussa; Gregg W Stone; Jeffrey W Moses; Martin B Leon; Roxana Mehran
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2005-01-01       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Comparison of iodixanol and iohexol in renal impairment.

Authors:  N Chalmers; R W Jackson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias.

Authors:  C B Begg; M Mazumdar
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Renal insufficiency as a predictor of cardiovascular outcomes and mortality in elderly individuals.

Authors:  Linda F Fried; Michael G Shlipak; Casey Crump; Anthony J Bleyer; John S Gottdiener; Richard A Kronmal; Lewis H Kuller; Anne B Newman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2003-04-16       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  The PREDICT study: a randomized double-blind comparison of contrast-induced nephropathy after low- or isoosmolar contrast agent exposure.

Authors:  Matthew J Kuhn; Nan Chen; Dushyant V Sahani; Dan Reimer; Edwin J R van Beek; Jay P Heiken; George J So
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Prognostic value of serum creatinine and effect of treatment of hypertension on renal function. Results from the hypertension detection and follow-up program. The Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program Cooperative Group.

Authors:  N B Shulman; C E Ford; W D Hall; M D Blaufox; D Simon; H G Langford; K A Schneider
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 10.190

10.  Choice of contrast medium in patients with impaired renal function undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Rainer Wessely; Tobias Koppara; Christian Bradaric; Marc Vorpahl; Siegmund Braun; Stefanie Schulz; Julinda Mehilli; Albert Schömig; Adnan Kastrati
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 6.546

View more
  16 in total

1.  Reducing Acute Kidney Injury Due to Contrast Material: How Nurses Can Improve Patient Safety.

Authors:  Peggy Lambert; Kristine Chaisson; Susan Horton; Carmen Petrin; Emily Marshall; Sue Bowden; Lynn Scott; Sheila Conley; Janette Stender; Gertrude Kent; Ellen Hopkins; Brian Smith; Anita Nicholson; Nancy Roy; Brenda Homsted; Cindy Downs; Cathy S Ross; Jeremiah Brown
Journal:  Crit Care Nurse       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.708

2.  Diagnosing and treating contrast-induced acute kidney injury in 2017.

Authors:  Vikram Raje; George Feldman; Ion S Jovin
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Are iso-osmolar, as compared to low-osmolar, contrast media cost-effective in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization? An economic analysis.

Authors:  Swapnil Hiremath; Ayub Akbari; George A Wells; Benjamin J W Chow
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 4.  Subclinical acute kidney injury (AKI) due to iodine-based contrast media.

Authors:  Claudio Ronco; Fulvio Stacul; Peter A McCullough
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Peripheral diagnostic and interventional procedures using an automated injection system for carbon dioxide (CO2): case series and learning curve.

Authors:  Arturo Giordano; Stefano Messina; Michele Polimeno; Nicola Corcione; Paolo Ferraro; Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai; Gabriele Giordano
Journal:  Heart Lung Vessel       Date:  2015

6.  Nephroprotective potential of carnitine against glycerol and contrast-induced kidney injury in rats through modulation of oxidative stress, proinflammatory cytokines, and apoptosis.

Authors:  Celalettin S Kunak; Rustem A Ugan; Elif Cadirci; Emre Karakus; Beyzagul Polat; Harun Un; Zekai Halici; Murat Saritemur; Hasan T Atmaca; Adem Karaman
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  A systematic review of the incidence of hypersensitivity reactions and post-contrast acute kidney injury after ioversol in more than 57,000 patients: part 1-intravenous administration.

Authors:  Aart J van der Molen; Ilona A Dekkers; Ibrahim Bedioune; Elisabeth Darmon-Kern
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 7.034

8.  To evaluate the damage of renal function in CIAKI rats at 3T: using ASL and BOLD MRI.

Authors:  Wen-Bo Chen; Long Liang; Bin Zhang; Chun-Ling Liu; Hong-Jun Liu; Hai-Ying Luo; Qiong-Xin Zeng; Chang-Hong Liang; Guan-Shu Liu; Shui-Xing Zhang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-03-29       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Intra-arterial and intravenous applications of Iosimenol 340 injection, a new non-ionic, dimeric, iso-osmolar radiographic contrast medium: phase 2 experience.

Authors:  Karoline Meurer; Michael Laniado; Norbert Hosten; Bettina Kelsch; Barry Hogstrom
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 1.990

Review 10.  Contrast media: are there differences in nephrotoxicity among contrast media?

Authors:  Richard Solomon
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.