| Literature DB >> 22164093 |
Wei-Song Wang1, Hong-Yi Huang, Shu-Chun Chen, Kuo-Chuan Ho, Chia-Yu Lin, Tse-Chuan Chou, Chih-Hsien Hu, Wen-Fong Wang, Cheng-Feng Wu, Ching-Hsing Luo.
Abstract
A real-time telemetry system, which consists of readout circuits, an analog-to-digital converter (ADC), a microcontroller unit (MCU), a graphical user interface (GUI), and a radio frequency (RF) transceiver, is proposed for amperometric and potentiometric electrochemical sensors. By integrating the proposed system with the electrochemical sensors, analyte detection can be conveniently performed. The data is displayed in real-time on a GUI and optionally uploaded to a database via the Internet, allowing it to be accessed remotely. An MCU was implemented using a field programmable gate array (FPGA) to filter noise, transmit data, and provide control over peripheral devices to reduce power consumption, which in sleep mode is 70 mW lower than in operating mode. The readout circuits, which were implemented in the TSMC 0.18-μm CMOS process, include a potentiostat and an instrumentation amplifier (IA). The measurement results show that the proposed potentiostat has a detectable current range of 1 nA to 100 μA, and linearity with an R2 value of 0.99998 in each measured current range. The proposed IA has a common-mode rejection ratio (CMRR) greater than 90 dB. The proposed system was integrated with a potentiometric pH sensor and an amperometric nitrite sensor for in vitro experiments. The proposed system has high linearity (an R2 value greater than 0.99 was obtained in each experiment), a small size of 5.6 cm × 8.7 cm, high portability, and high integration.Entities:
Keywords: electrochemical sensor; instrumentation amplifier; potentiostat; telemetry system
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22164093 PMCID: PMC3231501 DOI: 10.3390/s110908593
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1.Block diagram of proposed real-time telemetry system.
Figure 2.Set-up of the DDA circuit for open-circuit potential measurement.
Figure 3.Schematic of the DDA.
Transistor dimensions of the DDA.
| MN(P)1, MN(P)2 | 16.6/20 | MN(P)3, MN(P)4 | 3/20 |
| MN(P)5, MN(P)7 | 3/20 | MN(P)6, MN(P)8 | 16.6/20 |
| MN(P)9 | 3/4 | MN(P)10 | 112/10 |
| MN(P)11, M26 | 14/10 | MN(P)12, Mb3 | 16/10 |
| MN(P)13, M31 | 2/10 | M14–M17 | 98/4 |
| M18–M21 | 10/5 | M22–M25 | 14/4 |
| M27, M28 | 3/8 | M29, M30 | 11.5/4 |
| M32 | 138.5/2 | M33 | 18/2 |
| Mb1, Mb2 | 4/10 | Mb4, Mb6, Mb7 | 4/4 |
| Mb5 | 2/16 | Mb8 | 12/16 |
| Mb9–Mb11 | 16/4 | Mb12–Mb14 | 28/10 |
Figure 4.Set-up of the proposed potentiostat circuit for three-electrode amperometric sensors.
Figure 5.Schematic of the control amplifier.
Transistor dimensions of the control amplifier.
| M1, M2 | 19/20 | M3, M4 | 3.4/20 |
| M10 | 28/10 | M12 | 4/10 |
| M14, M15 | 24/4 | M16, M17 | 12/4 |
| M18–M21 | 6/20 | M22, M23, M27, M28 | 2/4 |
| M24, M25 | 4/4 | M26 | 14/10 |
| M29, M30 | 11.6/4 | M31 | 2/10 |
| M32 | 139.8/2 | M33 | 24/2 |
Figure 6.Block diagram of the proposed MCU.
Figure 7.Structure of the moving average filter.
Figure 8.Simulated frequency response of the adjustable cascade moving average filter.
Figure 9.State diagram of the mode control.
Figure 10.State diagram of the control unit.
Figure 11.Micrograph of the fabricated potentiostat.
Figure 12.Equivalent model of the three-electrode amperometric sensor.
Figure 13.Equivalent sensor current versus V − V of the proposed potentiostat. The R2 value of each current range is greater than 0.99998.
Specification comparison of the proposed potentiostat.
| 1.8 | 1.8 | ±0.9 | 1.8 | |
| 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.18 | |
| 1 n–1 μ | 1 n–200 n | - | 1 n–100 μ | |
| 0.9984 | - | 0.98 | 0.99998 | |
| CE | CE | WE | CE | |
| No | No | Yes | Yes | |
| SE | SE | FD | SE | |
| Freq. | Freq. | VCT | VCT | |
| 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.45 | 0.05 | |
| 70 | 171 | 15,840 | 82 |
FD: Fully-differential; SE: Single-ended; CT: Continuous time; RtR: Rail-to-Rail.
Figure 14.Photograph of the proposed system.
Power consumption of each block.
| 0.14 mW | ||
| 3.18 mW | ||
| 66.9 mW | ||
| 69.43 mW | 0.01 mW | |
| 17.6 mW | ||
Figure 15.Nitrite concentration versus the detected current signals.
Figure 16.pH value versus the detected potential signals.
Experimental results of the proposed system.
| 3.3 V | |
| 1 nA–100 μA | |
| >90 dB | |
| 2.8 μVrms | |
| >0.99 | |
| 157.25 mW | |
| 87.83 mW | |
| 433 MHz | |
| 1.8 k | |
| 5.6 cm × 8.7 cm | |
| 4 cm × 1.8 cm |