CONTEXT: Anterior drawer testing of the ankle is commonly used to diagnose lateral ligamentous instability. Our hypothesis was that changing knee and ankle positions would change the stability of the ankle complex during anterior drawer testing. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of knee and ankle position on anterior drawer laxity and stiffness of the ankle complex. DESIGN: A repeated-measures design with knee and ankle position as independent variables. SETTING: University research laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Bilateral ankles of 10 female (age = 19.8 +/- 1.1 years) and 10 male (age = 20.8 +/- 1.2 years) collegiate athletes were tested. INTERVENTION(S): Each ankle complex underwent loading using an ankle arthrometer under 4 test conditions consisting of 2 knee positions (90 degrees and 0 degrees of flexion) and 2 ankle positions (0 degrees and 10 degrees of plantar flexion [PF]). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Recorded anterior laxity (mm) and stiffness (N/mm). RESULTS: Anterior laxity of the ankle complex was maximal with the knee positioned at 90 degrees of flexion and the ankle at 10 degrees of PF when compared with the knee positioned at 0 degrees of flexion and the ankle at 10 degrees or 0 degrees of PF (P < .001), whereas ankle complex stiffness was greatest with the knee positioned at 0 degrees of flexion and the ankle at 0 degrees of PF (P < .009). CONCLUSIONS: Anterior drawer testing of the ankle complex with the knee positioned at 90 degrees of flexion and the ankle at 10 degrees of PF produced the most laxity and the least stiffness. These findings indicate that anterior drawer testing with the knee at 90 degrees of flexion and the ankle at 10 degrees of PF may permit better isolation of the ankle capsuloligamentous structures.
CONTEXT: Anterior drawer testing of the ankle is commonly used to diagnose lateral ligamentous instability. Our hypothesis was that changing knee and ankle positions would change the stability of the ankle complex during anterior drawer testing. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of knee and ankle position on anterior drawer laxity and stiffness of the ankle complex. DESIGN: A repeated-measures design with knee and ankle position as independent variables. SETTING: University research laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Bilateral ankles of 10 female (age = 19.8 +/- 1.1 years) and 10 male (age = 20.8 +/- 1.2 years) collegiate athletes were tested. INTERVENTION(S): Each ankle complex underwent loading using an ankle arthrometer under 4 test conditions consisting of 2 knee positions (90 degrees and 0 degrees of flexion) and 2 ankle positions (0 degrees and 10 degrees of plantar flexion [PF]). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Recorded anterior laxity (mm) and stiffness (N/mm). RESULTS: Anterior laxity of the ankle complex was maximal with the knee positioned at 90 degrees of flexion and the ankle at 10 degrees of PF when compared with the knee positioned at 0 degrees of flexion and the ankle at 10 degrees or 0 degrees of PF (P < .001), whereas ankle complex stiffness was greatest with the knee positioned at 0 degrees of flexion and the ankle at 0 degrees of PF (P < .009). CONCLUSIONS: Anterior drawer testing of the ankle complex with the knee positioned at 90 degrees of flexion and the ankle at 10 degrees of PF produced the most laxity and the least stiffness. These findings indicate that anterior drawer testing with the knee at 90 degrees of flexion and the ankle at 10 degrees of PF may permit better isolation of the ankle capsuloligamentous structures.
Authors: Tricia J Hubbard; Thomas W Kaminski; Robert A Vander Griend; John E Kovaleski Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: John E Kovaleski; Robert J Heitman; Larry R Gurchiek; J M Hollis; Wei Liu; Albert W Pearsall Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2014-02-25 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: John E Kovaleski; Robert J Heitman; Larry R Gurchiek; J M Hollis; Wei Liu; Albert W Pearsall Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2014-02-25 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Neil A Schwarz; John E Kovaleski; Robert J Heitman; Larry R Gurchiek; Coral Gubler-Hanna Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2011 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Shawn Hanlon; Jaclyn Caccese; Christopher A Knight; Charles Buz Swanik; Thomas W Kaminski Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2016-02-16 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: J S de Vries; G M M J Kerkhoffs; L Blankevoort; C N van Dijk Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2009-11-19 Impact factor: 4.342