Literature DB >> 22162780

Interactions between synchrotron radiation X-ray and biological tissues - theoretical and clinical significance.

Heyu Chen1, Xin He, Caibin Sheng, Yingxin Ma, Hui Nie, Weiliang Xia, Weihai Ying.   

Abstract

Synchrotron radiation (SR) X-ray has great potential for its applications in both diagnosis and treatment of diseases, due to its characteristic properties including coherence, collimation, monochromaticity, and exceptional brightness. Great advances have been made regarding potential medical applications of SR X-ray in recent years, particularly with the development of the third generation of SR light sources. However, multiple studies have also suggested damaging effects of SR X-ray on biological samples ranging from protein crystals to cells and biological tissues. It has become increasingly important to conduct comprehensive studies on two closely related topics regarding SR X-ray in medical applications: The safety issues regarding the medical applications of SR X-ray and the fundamental mechanisms underlying the interactions between SR X-ray and biological tissues. In this article, we attempted to provide an overview of the literatures regarding these two increasingly significant topics. We also proposed our hypothesis that there are significant differences between the biological tissue-damaging mechanisms of SR X-ray and those of normal X-ray, due to the characteristic properties of SR X-ray such as high dose rate. Future studies are warranted to test this hypothesis, which may profoundly improve our understanding regarding the fundamental mechanisms underlying the interactions between light and matter. These studies would also constitute an essential basis for establishing the safety standard for the medical applications of SR X-ray.

Keywords:  ROS; Synchrotron radiation; X-ray; radiation safety; tissue damage

Year:  2011        PMID: 22162780      PMCID: PMC3230257     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Physiol Pathophysiol Pharmacol        ISSN: 1944-8171


  35 in total

1.  Deleterious network: a testable pathogenetic concept of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  W Ying
Journal:  Gerontology       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 5.140

2.  Estimated radiation risks potentially associated with full-body CT screening.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Carl D Elliston
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-07-23       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Angioarchitectural changes in subacute cerebral venous thrombosis. A synchrotron-based micro- and nano-CT study.

Authors:  Erwin Stolz; Mesut Yeniguen; Melanie Kreisel; Marian Kampschulte; Simone Doenges; Daniel Sedding; Erik L Ritman; Tibo Gerriets; Alexander C Langheinrich
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Dose dependence of radiation damage for protein crystals studied at various X-ray energies.

Authors:  Nobutaka Shimizu; Kunio Hirata; Kazuya Hasegawa; Go Ueno; Masaki Yamamoto
Journal:  J Synchrotron Radiat       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 2.616

Review 5.  The effect of ionizing radiation on lipid membranes.

Authors:  G Stark
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1991-07-22

6.  SPIO-RGD nanoparticles as a molecular targeting probe for imaging tumor angiogenesis using synchrotron radiation.

Authors:  Jing Li; Chunfu Zhang; Ke Yang; Ping Liu; Lisa X Xu
Journal:  J Synchrotron Radiat       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 2.616

7.  Synchrotron radiation X-ray fluorescence microscopy reveals a spatial association of copper on elastic laminae in rat aortic media.

Authors:  Zhenyu Qin; Boulos Toursarkissian; Barry Lai
Journal:  Metallomics       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 4.526

8.  Tumor cell response to synchrotron microbeam radiation therapy differs markedly from cells in normal tissues.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Crosbie; Robin L Anderson; Kai Rothkamm; Christina M Restall; Leonie Cann; Saleela Ruwanpura; Sarah Meachem; Naoto Yagi; Imants Svalbe; Robert A Lewis; Bryan R G Williams; Peter A W Rogers
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  The mammography project at the SYRMEP beamline.

Authors:  D Dreossi; A Abrami; F Arfelli; P Bregant; K Casarin; V Chenda; M A Cova; R Longo; R-H Menk; E Quai; E Quaia; L Rigon; T Rokvic; D Sanabor; M Tonutti; G Tromba; A Vascotto; F Zanconati; E Castelli
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 3.528

10.  Enhancement of survival of 9L gliosarcoma bearing rats following intracerebral delivery of drugs in combination with microbeam radiation therapy.

Authors:  Pierrick Régnard; Elke Bräuer-Krisch; Irène Troprès; Jani Keyriläinen; Alberto Bravin; Géraldine Le Duc
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 3.528

View more
  3 in total

1.  NAD(+) administration significantly attenuates synchrotron radiation X-ray-induced DNA damage and structural alterations of rodent testes.

Authors:  Caibin Sheng; Heyu Chen; Ban Wang; Tengyuan Liu; Yunyi Hong; Jiaxiang Shao; Xin He; Yingxin Ma; Hui Nie; Na Liu; Weiliang Xia; Weihai Ying
Journal:  Int J Physiol Pathophysiol Pharmacol       Date:  2012-03-01

2.  Roles of oxidative stress in synchrotron radiation X-ray-induced testicular damage of rodents.

Authors:  Yingxin Ma; Hui Nie; Caibin Sheng; Heyu Chen; Ban Wang; Tengyuan Liu; Jiaxiang Shao; Xin He; Tingting Zhang; Chaobo Zheng; Weiliang Xia; Weihai Ying
Journal:  Int J Physiol Pathophysiol Pharmacol       Date:  2012-06-27

Review 3.  Roles of NAD (+) , PARP-1, and Sirtuins in Cell Death, Ischemic Brain Injury, and Synchrotron Radiation X-Ray-Induced Tissue Injury.

Authors:  Weihai Ying
Journal:  Scientifica (Cairo)       Date:  2013-12-10
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.