PURPOSE: Children with cancer receive mutagenic treatments, which raises concern about the potential transmissibility of germline damage to their offspring. This question has been inadequately studied to date because of a lack of detailed individual treatment exposure assessment such as gonadal radiation doses. METHODS: Within the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study, we performed a retrospective cohort analysis of validated cases of congenital anomalies among 4,699 children of 1,128 male and 1,627 female childhood cancer survivors. We quantified chemotherapy with alkylating agents and radiotherapy doses to the testes and ovaries and related these exposures to risk of congenital anomalies using logistic regression. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-nine children had at least one anomaly (prevalence = 2.7%). For children whose mothers were exposed to radiation or alkylating agents versus neither, the prevalence of anomalies was 3.0% versus 3.5% (P = .51); corresponding figures were 1.9% versus 1.7% (P = .79) for the children of male survivors. Neither ovarian radiation dose (mean, 1.19 Gy; odds ratio [OR] = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.20 to 1.75 for 2.50+ Gy) nor testicular radiation dose (mean, 0.48 Gy; OR = 1.01; 95% CI, 0.36 to 2.83 for 0.50+ Gy) was related to risk of congenital anomalies. Treatment with alkylating agents also was not significantly associated with anomalies in the children of male or female survivors. CONCLUSION: Our findings offer strong evidence that the children of cancer survivors are not at significantly increased risk for congenital anomalies stemming from their parent's exposure to mutagenic cancer treatments. This information is important for counseling cancer survivors planning to have children.
PURPOSE:Children with cancer receive mutagenic treatments, which raises concern about the potential transmissibility of germline damage to their offspring. This question has been inadequately studied to date because of a lack of detailed individual treatment exposure assessment such as gonadal radiation doses. METHODS: Within the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study, we performed a retrospective cohort analysis of validated cases of congenital anomalies among 4,699 children of 1,128 male and 1,627 female childhood cancer survivors. We quantified chemotherapy with alkylating agents and radiotherapy doses to the testes and ovaries and related these exposures to risk of congenital anomalies using logistic regression. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-nine children had at least one anomaly (prevalence = 2.7%). For children whose mothers were exposed to radiation or alkylating agents versus neither, the prevalence of anomalies was 3.0% versus 3.5% (P = .51); corresponding figures were 1.9% versus 1.7% (P = .79) for the children of male survivors. Neither ovarian radiation dose (mean, 1.19 Gy; odds ratio [OR] = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.20 to 1.75 for 2.50+ Gy) nor testicular radiation dose (mean, 0.48 Gy; OR = 1.01; 95% CI, 0.36 to 2.83 for 0.50+ Gy) was related to risk of congenital anomalies. Treatment with alkylating agents also was not significantly associated with anomalies in the children of male or female survivors. CONCLUSION: Our findings offer strong evidence that the children of cancer survivors are not at significantly increased risk for congenital anomalies stemming from their parent's exposure to mutagenic cancer treatments. This information is important for counseling cancer survivors planning to have children.
Authors: L B Kenney; H S Nicholson; C Brasseux; J L Mills; L L Robison; L K Zeltzer; A T Meadows; G H Reaman; J Byrne Journal: Cancer Date: 1996-07-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Claire Thomas; Christine Cans; Roberte Pelletier; Christine De Robertis; Mira Hazzouri; Bernard Sele; Sophie Rousseaux; Sylviane Hennebicq Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2004-10-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: J E Sanders; J Hawley; W Levy; T Gooley; C D Buckner; H J Deeg; K Doney; R Storb; K Sullivan; R Witherspoon; F R Appelbaum Journal: Blood Date: 1996-04-01 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Marilyn Stovall; Sarah S Donaldson; Rita E Weathers; Leslie L Robison; Ann C Mertens; Jeanette Falck Winther; Jorgen H Olsen; John D Boice Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2004-10-01 Impact factor: 8.013
Authors: Christina M Lam; Ksenya Shliakhtsitsava; Shaylyn S Stark; Alexa C O Medica; Kelsey A Pinson; Brian W Whitcomb; H Irene Su Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2020-02 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Monika L Metzger; Lillian R Meacham; Briana Patterson; Jacqueline S Casillas; Louis S Constine; Nobuko Hijiya; Lisa B Kenney; Marcia Leonard; Barbara A Lockart; Wendy Likes; Daniel M Green Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-02-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Gregory V Kryukov; Craig M Bielski; Kaitlin Samocha; Menachem Fromer; Sara Seepo; Carleen Gentry; Benjamin Neale; Levi A Garraway; Christopher J Sweeney; Mary-Ellen Taplin; Eliezer M Van Allen Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2015-12-02 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Wendy van Dorp; Riccardo Haupt; Richard A Anderson; Renee L Mulder; Marry M van den Heuvel-Eibrink; Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder; H Irene Su; Jeanette Falck Winther; Melissa M Hudson; Jennifer M Levine; W Hamish Wallace Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2018-06-06 Impact factor: 44.544