Literature DB >> 22161821

Preserving the allocation ratio at every allocation with biased coin randomization and minimization in studies with unequal allocation.

Olga M Kuznetsova1, Yevgen Tymofyeyev.   

Abstract

The demand for unequal allocation in clinical trials is growing. Most commonly, the unequal allocation is achieved through permuted block randomization. However, other allocation procedures might be required to better approximate the allocation ratio in small samples, reduce the selection bias in open-label studies, or balance on baseline covariates. When these allocation procedures are generalized to unequal allocation, special care is to be taken to preserve the allocation ratio at every allocation step. This paper offers a way to expand the biased coin randomization to unequal allocation that preserves the allocation ratio at every allocation. The suggested expansion works with biased coin randomization that balances only on treatment group totals and with covariate-adaptive procedures that use a random biased coin element at every allocation. Balancing properties of the allocation ratio preserving biased coin randomization and minimization are described through simulations. It is demonstrated that these procedures are asymptotically protected against the shift in the rerandomization distribution identified for some examples of minimization with 1:2 allocation. The asymptotic shift in the rerandomization distribution of the difference in treatment means for an arbitrary unequal allocation procedure is explicitly derived in the paper.
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22161821     DOI: 10.1002/sim.4447

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  9 in total

1.  Statistical properties of minimal sufficient balance and minimization as methods for controlling baseline covariate imbalance at the design stage of sequential clinical trials.

Authors:  Steven D Lauzon; Viswanathan Ramakrishnan; Paul J Nietert; Jody D Ciolino; Michael D Hill; Wenle Zhao
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  The ENGAGE-2 study: Engaging self-regulation targets to understand the mechanisms of behavior change and improve mood and weight outcomes in a randomized controlled trial (Phase 2).

Authors:  Nan Lv; Olusola A Ajilore; Corina R Ronneberg; Elizabeth M Venditti; Mark B Snowden; Philip W Lavori; Lan Xiao; Andrea N Goldstein-Piekarski; Joseph Wielgosz; Nancy E Wittels; Amruta Barve; Aashutos S Patel; Tessa L Eckley; Patrick Stetz; Ben S Gerber; Joshua M Smyth; Janine M Simmons; Lisa G Rosas; Leanne M Williams; Jun Ma
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  Mass weighted urn design--A new randomization algorithm for unequal allocations.

Authors:  Wenle Zhao
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 2.226

4.  Digital teaching tools in sports medicine: A randomized control trial comparing the effectiveness of virtual seminar and virtual fishbowl teaching method in medical students.

Authors:  Stefan Hertling; Doreen Hertling; Georg Matziolis; Ekkehard Schleußner; Franziska Loos; Isabel Graul
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Impact of minimal sufficient balance, minimization, and stratified permuted blocks on bias and power in the estimation of treatment effect in sequential clinical trials with a binary endpoint.

Authors:  Steven D Lauzon; Wenle Zhao; Paul J Nietert; Jody D Ciolino; Michael D Hill; Viswanathan Ramakrishnan
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 2.494

6.  Dementia Care Mapping™ to reduce agitation in care home residents with dementia: the EPIC cluster RCT.

Authors:  Claire A Surr; Ivana Holloway; Rebecca Ea Walwyn; Alys W Griffiths; David Meads; Rachael Kelley; Adam Martin; Vicki McLellan; Clive Ballard; Jane Fossey; Natasha Burnley; Lynn Chenoweth; Byron Creese; Murna Downs; Lucy Garrod; Elizabeth H Graham; Amanda Lilley-Kelley; Joanne McDermid; Holly Millard; Devon Perfect; Louise Robinson; Olivia Robinson; Emily Shoesmith; Najma Siddiqi; Graham Stokes; Daphne Wallace; Amanda J Farrin
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 4.014

7.  Generalization of Wei's urn design to unequal allocations in sequential clinical trials.

Authors:  Wenle Zhao; Viswanathan Ramakrishnan
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2016-04-15

8.  Sequence balance minimisation: minimising with unequal treatment allocations.

Authors:  Vichithranie W Madurasinghe
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 9.  Heterogeneous perception of the ethical legitimacy of unbalanced randomization by institutional review board members: a clinical vignette-based survey.

Authors:  Clarisse Dibao-Dina; Agnès Caille; Bruno Giraudeau
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 2.279

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.