Literature DB >> 15725798

Characterization of micrometastatic disease in melanoma sentinel lymph nodes by enhanced pathology: recommendations for standardizing pathologic analysis.

Kathryn Spanknebel1, Daniel G Coit, Samuel C Bieligk, Mithat Gonen, Juan Rosai, David S Klimstra.   

Abstract

Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy are widely used as a staging technique for patients with cutaneous malignant melanoma who are at risk for metastases. SLN status has been shown to be a strong predictor of prognosis, and a variety of techniques have been used to identify minimal metastatic disease in SLNs. However, there is no validated consensus method for the optimal histologic analysis of SLNs harvested from melanoma patients. This study was conducted: 1) to assess the yield of metastatic melanoma detected in SLNs deemed negative by initial routine pathologic analysis (RPA) by subjecting them (after review of the original slides) to enhanced pathologic analysis (EPA) that included complete step-sectioning and immunohistochemistry (IHC); 2) to characterize the distribution of metastatic melanoma deposits within the SLNs; 3) to determine a preferred method of pathologic analysis applicable to daily practice; and 4) to attempt to assess the clinical significance of disease detected by EPA. A total of 105 SLNs were harvested from 49 patients who underwent successful SLN biopsy procedures during the period of study. Ten SLNs from 10 patients were positive on initial RPA and were not analyzed further. Ninety-five SLNs from the remaining 39 patients were reviewed and processed with additional hematoxylin and eosin, S-100 protein, and HMB-45 stains at 50-microm intervals for 20 levels or until the SLN tissue was exhausted. A single pathologist reviewed all sections without knowledge of the results of the other stains. Overall, metastatic melanoma was discovered in SLNs from 20 of the 39 patients: SLNs from 6 patients were found to have melanoma on review of the original hematoxylin and eosin slides, and SLNs from 14 patients were positive only after EPA. Twenty-one individual positive SLNs from these 14 patients were detected by EPA; of these, 10 positive SLNs were identified solely by IHC, representing 12% of the patient cohort and 10% of all SLNs studied by EPA. Detection rates were significantly associated with the staining method and the number of levels performed (P < 0.01). S-100 protein staining resulted in the highest yield of SLN positivity (86%), followed by HMB-45 (81%) and hematoxylin and eosin (52%). No single method detected all of the micrometastases. A detailed topographic mapping of metastatic deposits in SLNs was carried out. When using all three staining techniques, all 20 levels were required to identify 100% of the micrometastases; 95% of positive SLNs were identified with 17 levels, 90% with 15 levels, 75% with 10 levels, and 42% with 3 levels. Projected rates of detection for various different sectioning strategies were determined, with alteration of either the number of levels examined, the interval between the levels, or both. Detection of SLN positivity can be increased to 71% by performing three levels at 250-mum intervals, each level being composed of a set of three sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin, S-100 protein, and HMB-45, respectively. Therefore, this is the methodology we propose for the study of SLNs in melanoma patients. After a median follow-up of 87 months (range, 9-134 months), patients with EPA-detected disease and those with negative SLNs by EPA demonstrated improved recurrence-free and disease-specific survival compared with patients with RPA-detected disease in SLNs. Sampling error introduced by variations in pathologic processing should be addressed by standardization of pathologic methods, and the clinical significance of minimal SLN disease should be addressed in prospective studies of homogeneously staged patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15725798     DOI: 10.1097/01.pas.0000152134.36030.b7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  18 in total

1.  Prognostic value of sentinel lymph node biopsy in 121 low-risk melanomas (tumour thickness <1.00 mm) on the basis of a long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Torsten Hinz; Hojjat Ahmadzadehfar; Anja Wierzbicki; Tobias Höller; Jörg Wenzel; Hans-Jürgen Biersack; Thomas Bieber; Monika-H Schmid-Wendtner
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Up-to-date management of lymph node metastasis and the role of tailored lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Noriaki Sakuragi
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 3.  The efficient operation of the surgical pathology gross room.

Authors:  W C Bell; E S Young; P E Billings; W E Grizzle
Journal:  Biotech Histochem       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.718

4.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy in malignant melanoma.

Authors:  J Meirion Thomas
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-04-26

5.  EANM-EORTC general recommendations for sentinel node diagnostics in melanoma.

Authors:  Annette H Chakera; Birger Hesse; Zeynep Burak; James R Ballinger; Allan Britten; Corrado Caracò; Alistair J Cochran; Martin G Cook; Krzysztof T Drzewiecki; Richard Essner; Einat Even-Sapir; Alexander M M Eggermont; Tanja Gmeiner Stopar; Christian Ingvar; Martin C Mihm; Stanley W McCarthy; Nicola Mozzillo; Omgo E Nieweg; Richard A Scolyer; Hans Starz; John F Thompson; Giuseppe Trifirò; Giuseppe Viale; Sergi Vidal-Sicart; Roger Uren; Wendy Waddington; Arturo Chiti; Alain Spatz; Alessandro Testori
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Sentinel node biopsy for early-stage melanoma: accuracy and morbidity in MSLT-I, an international multicenter trial.

Authors:  Donald L Morton; Alistair J Cochran; John F Thompson; Robert Elashoff; Richard Essner; Edwin C Glass; Nicola Mozzillo; Omgo E Nieweg; Daniel F Roses; Harald J Hoekstra; Constantine P Karakousis; Douglas S Reintgen; Brendon J Coventry; He-jing Wang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Long-term follow-up and survival of patients following a recurrence of melanoma after a negative sentinel lymph node biopsy result.

Authors:  Edward L Jones; Teresa S Jones; Nathan W Pearlman; Dexiang Gao; Robert Stovall; Csaba Gajdos; Nicole Kounalakis; Rene Gonzalez; Karl D Lewis; William A Robinson; Martin D McCarter
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 14.766

8.  Assessment of hospital-level adjusted breast cancer sentinel lymph node positivity rates.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Berger; Karl Y Bilimoria; Christine V Kinnier; Christina A Minami; Kevin P Bethke; Nora M Hansen; Ryan P Merkow; David P Winchester; Anthony D Yang
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 3.454

9.  The value of intraoperative frozen section examination of sentinel lymph nodes in surgical management of breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Calogero Cipolla; Daniela Cabibi; Salvatore Fricano; Salvatore Vieni; Irene Gentile; Mario Adelfio Latteri
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 10.  Significance of sentinel lymph node biopsy in malignant melanoma: overview of international data.

Authors:  Yoichi Moroi
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.