Literature DB >> 10982605

One hundred and eleven liver resections for hilar bile duct cancer.

S G Lee1, Y J Lee, K M Park, S Hwang, P C Min.   

Abstract

A positive correlation between absence of residual tumor at resection margins and long-term survival in the treatment of hilar bile duct carcinoma has encouraged some surgeons to use a more radical approach, including liver/portal vein resection and combined pancreatoduodenectomy. However, if liver resection is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, it may not produce any overall benefit. This review was undertaken in an attempt to determine whether liver resection is a safe procedure and whether if has any beneficial effect over that of local bile duct excision alone, in terms of achieving curative resection and long-term survival. The records of 151 patients with hilar bile duct carcinoma surgically treated between June 1989 and December 1997 at the Asan Medical Center, Seoul, were retrospectively analyzed. Surgical resection was possible in 128 patients. The remaining 23 patients had surgical palliative drainage. Local bile duct excision alone was performed in 17 patients. Liver resection for tumor extending to secondary bile ducts or hepatic parenchyma was performed in 111 patients; portal vein resection was necessary in 29 of these 111 patients (26.1%) and pancreatoduodenectomy was combined in 18 patients (16.2%). Seven patients died during hospitalization after liver resection, an operative mortality of 6.3%. Margins of bile duct resection were free of tumor on histologic examination in 4 of the 17 local bile duct excisions, but in 86 of the 111 liver resections. The cumulative survival rate after local bile duct excision was 85.7% at 1 year, 42.9% at 2 years, 21.4% at 3 years, and 0% at 4 years. However, the survival rate after liver resection (excluding operative mortality) was 97.1% at 1 year, 72.8% at 2 years, 55.3% at 3 years, and 24.0% at 5 years. Survival and the percentage of patients with tumor-free resection margins after liver resection were superior to those after local bile duct excision. Resection of hilar bile duct carcinoma offers long-term survival only when surgery is aggressive and includes liver resection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10982605     DOI: 10.1007/s005340050167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg        ISSN: 0944-1166


  50 in total

Review 1.  Review article: surgical, neo-adjuvant and adjuvant management strategies in biliary tract cancer.

Authors:  J R A Skipworth; S W M Olde Damink; C Imber; J Bridgewater; S P Pereira; M Malagó
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 8.171

2.  [Hilar cholangiocarcinoma -- results of en bloc resection of tumor and liver].

Authors:  G Otto; J Thies; M Hoppe-Lotichius; F Bittinger; M B Pitton; A Hadian
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 3.  Preoperative biliary drainage before resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: whether or not? A systematic review.

Authors:  Fei Liu; Ya Li; Yonggang Wei; Bo Li
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Bile duct surgery in the treatment of hepatobiliary and gallbladder malignancies: effects of hepatic and vascular resection on outcomes.

Authors:  Perry Shen; Nora Fino; Edward A Levine; Pamela Eversole; Clancy Clark
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 3.647

5.  One hundred two consecutive hepatobiliary resections for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma with zero mortality.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Sano; Kazuaki Shimada; Yoshihiro Sakamoto; Junji Yamamoto; Susumu Yamasaki; Tomoo Kosuge
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma in the North of England: pathology, treatment, and outcome.

Authors:  S D Mansfield; O Barakat; R M Charnley; B C Jaques; C B O'Suilleabhain; P J Atherton; D Manas
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Liver transplantation is not indicated for cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  C Wright Pinson; Derek E Moore
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.647

8.  Operative considerations in resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Alexander A Parikh; Eddie K Abdalla; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.647

9.  Principles of surgical resection in hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Emilio Ramos
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2013-07-15

Review 10.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of vascular resection in the treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Saleh Abbas; Charbel Sandroussi
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 3.647

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.