Literature DB >> 22159628

Cutting through the clutter: searching for targets in evolving complex scenes.

Mark B Neider1, Gregory J Zelinsky.   

Abstract

We evaluated the use of visual clutter as a surrogate measure of set size effects in visual search by comparing the effects of subjective clutter (determined by independent raters) and objective clutter (as quantified by edge count and feature congestion) using "evolving" scenes, ones that varied incrementally in clutter while maintaining their semantic continuity. Observers searched for a target building in rural, suburban, and urban city scenes created using the game SimCity. Stimuli were 30 screenshots obtained for each scene type as the city evolved over time. Reaction times and search guidance (measured by scan path ratio) were fastest/strongest for sparsely cluttered rural scenes, slower/weaker for more cluttered suburban scenes, and slowest/weakest for highly cluttered urban scenes. Subjective within-city clutter estimates also increased as each city matured and correlated highly with RT and search guidance. However, multiple regression modeling revealed that adding objective estimates failed to better predict search performance over the subjective estimates alone. This suggests that within-city clutter may not be explained exclusively by low-level feature congestion; conceptual congestion (e.g., the number of different types of buildings in a scene), part of the subjective clutter measure, may also be important in determining the effects of clutter on search.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22159628     DOI: 10.1167/11.14.7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  11 in total

1.  Modeling visual clutter perception using proto-object segmentation.

Authors:  Chen-Ping Yu; Dimitris Samaras; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Losing the trees for the forest in dynamic visual search.

Authors:  Nicole L Jardine; Cathleen M Moore
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  TAM: Explaining off-object fixations and central fixation tendencies as effects of population averaging during search.

Authors:  Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2012-05-23

4.  Clutter perception is invariant to image size.

Authors:  Gregory J Zelinsky; Chen-Ping Yu
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Are all real-world objects created equal? Estimating the "set-size" of the search target in visual working memory.

Authors:  Michael T Miuccio; Gregory J Zelinsky; Joseph Schmidt
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2022-01-09       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 6.  Guided Search 6.0: An updated model of visual search.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-02-05

7.  Grids in topographic maps reduce distortions in the recall of learned object locations.

Authors:  Dennis Edler; Anne-Kathrin Bestgen; Lars Kuchinke; Frank Dickmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Binocular advantage for prehension movements performed in visually enriched environments requiring visual search.

Authors:  Roshani Gnanaseelan; Dave A Gonzalez; Ewa Niechwiej-Szwedo
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 9.  Visual Illusions in Radiology: Untrue Perceptions in Medical Images and Their Implications for Diagnostic Accuracy.

Authors:  Robert G Alexander; Fahd Yazdanie; Stephen Waite; Zeshan A Chaudhry; Srinivas Kolla; Stephen L Macknik; Susana Martinez-Conde
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 5.152

10.  Turning visual search time on its head.

Authors:  S P Arun
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.