Literature DB >> 22158301

Influencing segmental balance in isthmic spondylolisthesis using transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Gregor Recnik1, Robert Košak, Rok Vengust.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to analyze segmental balance in patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis undergoing single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Sagittal malalignment of the fused segment was suggested to be associated with degeneration of the adjacent segment. Meticulous surgical technique and particular attention to hardware positioning with the aim to restore segmental balance at the fusion level have been recommended to achieve better long-term clinical outcomes, but no single study addressed all proposed factors.
METHODS: Standard lateral radiographs of the lumbosacral spine in the neutral standing position were retrospectively obtained for 32 patients undergoing single-level TLIF. Preoperative versus postoperative versus final follow-up (12 to 60 mo) values of translational slip (TS), posterior disc space height (PDSH), and segmental lordosis (SL) were compared using paired samples t test. Change in SL postoperatively between groups of next grouping variables: type and position of the interbody device, and rod contouring, was compared using 2-tailed independent samples t test. Association between position of the interbody device and immediate PDSH was addressed with regression analysis postoperatively and at final follow-up.
RESULTS: Mean TS decreased (P<0.001) and mean PDSH increased (P=0.002), but no significant change in SL occurred postoperatively (P=0.811). Increase in SL was observed with ventral positioning of the interbody device (P=0.009) and with bending of connecting rods (P=0.023). During follow-up, there was increase in TS (P=0.002) and decrease in PDSH (P<0.001) and SL (P<0.001) compared with postoperative values. Lower PDSH was found to be associated with more ventral positioning of the interbody device, both postoperatively (P=0.035) and at final follow-up (P=0.029).
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that reduction of TS and restoration of disc space height are readily achieved with single-level TLIF. However, to establish an increase in SL consistent rod contouring and meticulous anterior placement of the interbody device should be applied. Excessive ventral positioning of the cages might result in insufficient disc space height restoration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 22158301     DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182416f5c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech        ISSN: 1536-0652


  9 in total

1.  An RCT study comparing the clinical and radiological outcomes with the use of PLIF or TLIF after instrumented reduction in adult isthmic spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Er-Zhu Yang; Jian-Guang Xu; Xiao-Kang Liu; Gen-Yang Jin; Wenzhen Xiao; Bing-Fang Zeng; Xiao-Feng Lian
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Analysis of single cage position in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion through digital images.

Authors:  Xin Zhao; Chen Chen; Tangjun Zhou; Jie Mi; Lin Du; Zhanrong Kang; Jianming Huang; Kai Zhang; Xiaojiang Sun; Jie Zhao
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-02-11       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Failure to maintain segmental lordosis during TLIF for one-level degenerative spondylolisthesis negatively affects clinical outcome 5 years postoperatively: a prospective cohort of 57 patients.

Authors:  Matevž Kuhta; Klemen Bošnjak; Rok Vengust
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Bilateral tubular minimally invasive surgery for low-dysplastic lumbosacral lytic spondylolisthesis (LDLLS): analysis of a series focusing on postoperative sagittal balance and review of the literature.

Authors:  Giuseppe M V Barbagallo; Mario Piccini; Abdulrazzaq Alobaid; Abdulaziz Al-Mutair; Vincenzo Albanese; Francesco Certo
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Comparison of clinical outcomes and spino-pelvic sagittal balance in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: Minimally invasive oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF).

Authors:  Renjie Li; Xiaofeng Shao; Xuefeng Li; Yijie Liu; Weimin Jiang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Postoperative Outcome of Robot-Assisted Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Sultan Alsalmi; Mohammad Alsofyani; Abdulgadir Bugdadi; Abdu Alkhairi; Johann Peltier; Michel Lefranc
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2021-12-18

7.  Slip Reduction Rate between Minimal Invasive and Conventional Unilateral Transforaminal Interbody Fusion in Patients with Low-Grade Isthmic Spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Chang Hyun Oh; Gyu Yeul Ji; Jae Kyun Jeon; Junho Lee; Seung Hwan Yoon; Dong Keun Hyun
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2013-12-31

8.  Improvement of Segmental Lordosis in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Comparison of Two Techniques.

Authors:  James W Rice; Cara L Sedney; Scott D Daffner; Justin W Arner; Sanford E Emery; John C France
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2015-07-29

9.  Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable cages: Radiological and clinical results of banana-shaped and straight implants.

Authors:  Tjark Tassemeier; Marcel Haversath; Marcus Jäger
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.