Literature DB >> 22158063

Biomechanical comparison of occiput-C1-C2 fixation techniques: C0-C1 transarticular screw and direct occiput condyle screw.

Tomoyuki Takigawa1, Peter Simon, Alejandro A Espinoza Orías, Jae Taek Hong, Yasuo Ito, Nozomu Inoue, Howard S An.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: In vitro human cadaveric biomechanical study.
OBJECTIVE: The objective was to evaluate and compare the construct stability of occiput-C1-C2 fixation provided by C0-C1 transarticular screws or occipital condyle screws. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The placement of an occipital plate is commonly recommended in occipitocervical fixation surgery. However, there are unique clinical situations in which the placement of the occipital plate may not be possible or may have already failed. For these situations, 2 novel techniques that use the occipital condyle have been recently introduced: (1) C0-C1 transarticular screws fixation and (2) direct occipital condyle screws and C1 lateral mass screws fixation. However, there is a lack of thorough biomechanics studies of these techniques.
METHODS: Nondestructive kinematic tests and destructive tests were conducted in 16 fresh frozen cadaveric spines. As a nondestructive kinematic test, a pure moment of up to 2.0 N·m was applied in smooth continuous flexion/extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation motions. In addition to an intact-state case, a total of 5 different constructs (standard occipital plate, C0-C1 transarticular screws with/without occipital plate, and occipital condyle screws with/without occipital plate) were tested after destabilization of C0-C1 and C1-C2. All constructs had C2 pedicle screws fixation, and occipital condyle screws were incorporated with C1 lateral screws.
RESULTS: All fixation techniques significantly reduced ranges of motion compared with the intact state. In comparison with the standard occipital plate construct, the 2 novel techniques showed higher stability in axial rotation and lower stability in lateral bending. In both nondestructive and destructive tests, there were no statistical differences between C0-C1 transarticular screw construct and occipital condyle screw construct.
CONCLUSION: The C0-C1 transarticular screw technique and direct occipital condyle screw with C1 lateral mass screw technique can be salvage fixation methods when occipital plate fixation is not feasible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22158063     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182436669

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  5 in total

1.  Free-hand placement of occipital condyle screws: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Mohamed Ali El-Gaidi; Ehab Mohamed Eissa; Ehab A A El-Shaarawy
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  The causes and treatment strategies for the postoperative complications of occipitocervical fusion: a 316 cases retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Baorong He; Liang Yan; Zhengwei Xu; Zhen Chang; Dingjun Hao
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-05-18       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Comparison of imaging parameters pre- and post- reductive procedure for atlantoaxial dislocation via posterior fixation using pedicle screw and rod: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Jia Shao; Yanzheng Gao; Kun Gao; Zhenghong Yu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Analysis of Associating Radiologic Parameters With Clinical Outcomes After Posterior C1-2 Fusion.

Authors:  Jong-Hyeok Park; Jong Tae Kim; Il Sup Kim; Jae Taek Hong
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2022-05-15

5.  Computed Tomography-Based Occipital Condyle Morphometry in an Indian Population to Assess the Feasibility of Condylar Screws for Occipitocervical Fusion.

Authors:  Abhishek Srivastava; Geetanjali Nanda; Rajat Mahajan; Ankur Nanda; Nirajana Mishra; Srinivasa Karmaran; Sahil Batra; Harvinder Singh Chhabra
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2017-12-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.