PURPOSE: Small-cell prostate carcinoma (SCPC) morphology predicts for a distinct clinical behavior, resistance to androgen ablation, and frequent but short responses to chemotherapy. We sought to develop model systems that reflect human SCPC and can improve our understanding of its biology. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We developed a set of castration-resistant prostate carcinomas xenografts and examined their fidelity to their human tumors of origin. We compared the expression and genomic profiles of SCPC and large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) xenografts to those of typical prostate adenocarcinoma xenografts. Results were validated immunohistochemically in a panel of 60 human tumors. RESULTS: The reported SCPC and LCNEC xenografts retain high fidelity to their human tumors of origin and are characterized by a marked upregulation of UBE2C and other mitotic genes in the absence of androgen receptor (AR), retinoblastoma (RB1), and cyclin D1 (CCND1) expression. We confirmed these findings in a panel of samples of CRPC patients. In addition, array comparative genomic hybridization of the xenografts showed that the SCPC/LCNEC tumors display more copy number variations than the adenocarcinoma counterparts. Amplification of the UBE2C locus and microdeletions of RB1 were present in a subset, but none displayed AR nor CCND1 deletions. The AR, RB1, and CCND1 promoters showed no CpG methylation in the SCPC xenografts. CONCLUSION: Modeling human prostate carcinoma with xenografts allows in-depth and detailed studies of its underlying biology. The detailed clinical annotation of the donor tumors enables associations of anticipated relevance to be made. Future studies in the xenografts will address the functional significance of the findings.
PURPOSE:Small-cell prostate carcinoma (SCPC) morphology predicts for a distinct clinical behavior, resistance to androgen ablation, and frequent but short responses to chemotherapy. We sought to develop model systems that reflect human SCPC and can improve our understanding of its biology. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We developed a set of castration-resistant prostate carcinomas xenografts and examined their fidelity to their humantumors of origin. We compared the expression and genomic profiles of SCPC and large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) xenografts to those of typical prostate adenocarcinoma xenografts. Results were validated immunohistochemically in a panel of 60 humantumors. RESULTS: The reported SCPC and LCNEC xenografts retain high fidelity to their humantumors of origin and are characterized by a marked upregulation of UBE2C and other mitotic genes in the absence of androgen receptor (AR), retinoblastoma (RB1), and cyclin D1 (CCND1) expression. We confirmed these findings in a panel of samples of CRPC patients. In addition, array comparative genomic hybridization of the xenografts showed that the SCPC/LCNEC tumors display more copy number variations than the adenocarcinoma counterparts. Amplification of the UBE2C locus and microdeletions of RB1 were present in a subset, but none displayed AR nor CCND1 deletions. The AR, RB1, and CCND1 promoters showed no CpG methylation in the SCPC xenografts. CONCLUSION: Modeling humanprostate carcinoma with xenografts allows in-depth and detailed studies of its underlying biology. The detailed clinical annotation of the donortumors enables associations of anticipated relevance to be made. Future studies in the xenografts will address the functional significance of the findings.
Authors: H Kinoshita; Y Shi; C Sandefur; L F Meisner; C Chang; A Choon; C R Reznikoff; G S Bova; A Friedl; D F Jarrard Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2000-07-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Mary Beth Beasley; Sylvie Lantuejoul; Susan Abbondanzo; Wei-Sing Chu; Philip S Hasleton; William D Travis; Elizabeth Brambilla Journal: Hum Pathol Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 3.466
Authors: Sunanda J Chatterjee; Ben George; Peter J Goebell; Mohammad Alavi-Tafreshi; Shan-Rong Shi; Yuen Kai Fung; Peter A Jones; Carlos Cordon-Cardo; Ram H Datar; Richard J Cote Journal: J Pathol Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 7.996
Authors: Andreas Varkaris; Paul G Corn; Nila U Parikh; Eleni Efstathiou; Jian H Song; Yu-Chen Lee; Ana Aparicio; Anh G Hoang; Sanchaika Gaur; Lynnelle Thorpe; Sankar N Maity; Menashe Bar Eli; Bogdan A Czerniak; Yiping Shao; Mian Alauddin; Sue-Hwa Lin; Christopher J Logothetis; Gary E Gallick Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2015-08-13 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Christopher J Logothetis; Gary E Gallick; Sankar N Maity; Jeri Kim; Ana Aparicio; Eleni Efstathiou; Sue-Hwa Lin Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2013-06-28 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: N Korzeniewski; M Tapia-Laliena; Y Tolstov; S Pahernik; B Hadaschik; M Hohenfellner; S Duensing Journal: Urologe A Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 0.639
Authors: Wei Zhang; Bo Liu; Wenhui Wu; Likun Li; Bradley M Broom; Spyridon P Basourakos; Dimitrios Korentzelos; Yang Luan; Jianxiang Wang; Guang Yang; Sanghee Park; Abul Kalam Azad; Xuhong Cao; Jeri Kim; Paul G Corn; Christopher J Logothetis; Ana M Aparicio; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Nora Navone; Patricia Troncoso; Timothy C Thompson Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2017-11-14 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Hsueh-Li Tan; Akshay Sood; Hameed A Rahimi; Wenle Wang; Nilesh Gupta; Jessica Hicks; Stacy Mosier; Christopher D Gocke; Jonathan I Epstein; George J Netto; Wennuan Liu; William B Isaacs; Angelo M De Marzo; Tamara L Lotan Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2013-12-09 Impact factor: 12.531