Literature DB >> 22155972

Evaluating the genotoxicity of topoisomerase-targeted antibiotics.

Daniel J Smart1, Anthony M Lynch.   

Abstract

Antibiotics like fluoroquinolones (FQs) that target bacterial type II topoisomerases pose a potential genotoxic risk due to interactions with mammalian topoisomerase II (TOPO II) counterparts. Inhibition of TOPO II can lead to the generation of clastogenic DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) that can in turn manifest in mutagenesis. Thus, methods that allow early identification of drugs that present the greatest hazard are warranted. A rapid, medium-throughput and predictive genotoxicity screen that can be applied to bacterial type II topoisomerase inhibitors is described herein. Maximal induction of the DSB biomarker serine139-phosphorylated histone H2AX (γH2AX) in L5178Y cells was quantified via flow cytometry and correlated with data derived from the mouse lymphoma screen (MLS), a default assay used to rank genotoxic potential. When applied to a class of novel bacterial type II topoisomerase inhibitors (NBTIs) in lead-optimisation, maximal γH2AX induction >1.4-fold (relative to controls) identified 22/27 NBTIs that induced >6-fold relative mutation frequency (MF) in MLS. Moreover, response signatures comprising of γH2AX induction and G(2)M cell cycle arrest elucidated using this approach suggested that these NBTIs, primarily of the H class, operated via a TOPO II poison-like mechanism of action (MoA) similar to FQs. NBTIs that induced ≤6-fold relative MF, which were mainly A class-derived, had less impact on γH2AX (≤1.4-fold) and also evoked G(1) arrest, indicating that their cytotoxic effects were likely mediated through a non-poison MoA. Concordance between assays was 86% (54/63) when 1.4- and 6-fold 'cut offs' were applied. These findings were corroborated through inspection of human TOPO IIα IC(50) data as NBTIs exhibiting equivalent inhibitory capacities had differing genotoxic potencies. Deployed in an early screening capacity, the γH2AX by flow assay coupled with structure-activity relationship evaluation can provide insight into MoA and impact medicinal chemistry efforts, ultimately leading to the production of inherently safer molecules.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22155972      PMCID: PMC3331794          DOI: 10.1093/mutage/ger089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutagenesis        ISSN: 0267-8357            Impact factor:   3.000


  43 in total

Review 1.  Drugs for bad bugs: confronting the challenges of antibacterial discovery.

Authors:  David J Payne; Michael N Gwynn; David J Holmes; David L Pompliano
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2006-12-08       Impact factor: 84.694

2.  Differential sensitivities of recombinant human topoisomerase IIalpha and beta to various classes of topoisomerase II-interacting agents.

Authors:  D Perrin; B van Hille; B T Hill
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  1998-08-15       Impact factor: 5.858

Review 3.  DNA gyrase as a drug target.

Authors:  A Maxwell
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 17.079

4.  Mouse lymphoma thymidine kinase gene mutation assay: follow-up meeting of the International Workshop on Genotoxicity Testing--Aberdeen, Scotland, 2003--Assay acceptance criteria, positive controls, and data evaluation.

Authors:  Martha M Moore; Masamitsu Honma; Julie Clements; George Bolcsfoldi; Brian Burlinson; Maria Cifone; Jane Clarke; Robert Delongchamp; Robert Durward; Michael Fellows; Bhaskar Gollapudi; Saimei Hou; Peter Jenkinson; Melvin Lloyd; Jenness Majeska; Brian Myhr; Michael O'Donovan; Takashi Omori; Colin Riach; Richard San; Leon F Stankowski; Ajit K Thakur; Freddy Van Goethem; Shinobu Wakuri; Isao Yoshimura
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.216

5.  Assessment of ATM phosphorylation on Ser-1981 induced by DNA topoisomerase I and II inhibitors in relation to Ser-139-histone H2AX phosphorylation, cell cycle phase, and apoptosis.

Authors:  Akira Kurose; Toshiki Tanaka; Xuan Huang; H Dorota Halicka; Frank Traganos; Wei Dai; Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.355

Review 6.  Cytometric assessment of DNA damage in relation to cell cycle phase and apoptosis.

Authors:  Xuan Huang; H Dorota Halicka; Frank Traganos; Toshiki Tanaka; Akira Kurose; Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 6.831

7.  Genotoxicity of 17 gyrase- and four mammalian topoisomerase II-poisons in prokaryotic and eukaryotic test systems.

Authors:  S Albertini; A A Chételat; B Miller; W Muster; E Pujadas; R Strobel; E Gocke
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 3.000

8.  A topoisomerase II-dependent G2 cycle checkpoint in mammalian cells/.

Authors:  C S Downes; D J Clarke; A M Mullinger; J F Giménez-Abián; A M Creighton; R T Johnson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-12-01       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Potent clastogenicity of the human carcinogen etoposide to the mouse bone marrow and mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells: comparison to Salmonella responses.

Authors:  J Ashby; H Tinwell; P Glover; P Poorman-Allen; R Krehl; R D Callander; D Clive
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.216

10.  The 1'-substituent on the anilino ring of the antitumor drug amsacrine is a critical element for topoisomerase II inhibition and cytotoxicity.

Authors:  B Rene; P Fosse; T Khelifa; A Jacquemin-Sablon; C Bailly
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.436

View more
  7 in total

1.  Pharmacodynamic Profile of GSK2140944 against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a Murine Lung Infection Model.

Authors:  Wonhee So; Jared L Crandon; David P Nicolau
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Trovafloxacin enhances lipopolysaccharide-stimulated production of tumor necrosis factor-α by macrophages: role of the DNA damage response.

Authors:  Kyle L Poulsen; Jesus Olivero-Verbel; Kevin M Beggs; Patricia E Ganey; Robert A Roth
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 4.030

3.  Human cell death in relation to DNA damage after exposure to the untreated and biologically treated pharmaceutical wastewater.

Authors:  Mounira Krifa; Afef Dellai; Ines Bouhlel; Jacque Robert; Ameur Cherif; Daniel Barillier; Ridha Mosrati; Leila Chekir-Ghedira; Hedi Ben Mansour
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 4.  DNA damage signaling assessed in individual cells in relation to the cell cycle phase and induction of apoptosis.

Authors:  Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz; Hong Zhao; H Dorota Halicka; Paulina Rybak; Jurek Dobrucki; Donald Wlodkowic
Journal:  Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 6.250

5.  Cellular Pharmacokinetics and Intracellular Activity of Gepotidacin against Staphylococcus aureus Isolates with Different Resistance Phenotypes in Models of Cultured Phagocytic Cells.

Authors:  Frédéric Peyrusson; Paul M Tulkens; Françoise Van Bambeke
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  Advantages of evaluating γH2AX induction in non-clinical drug development.

Authors:  Shigeki Motoyama; Akira Takeiri; Kenji Tanaka; Asako Harada; Kaori Matsuzaki; Junko Taketo; Saori Matsuo; Etsuko Fujii; Masayuki Mishima
Journal:  Genes Environ       Date:  2018-05-14

Review 7.  Selective toxicity of antibacterial agents-still a valid concept or do we miss chances and ignore risks?

Authors:  Axel Dalhoff
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 7.455

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.