Literature DB >> 22155074

Patient acceptable symptom state and OMERACT-OARSI set of responder criteria in joint replacement. Identification of cut-off values.

A Escobar1, M Gonzalez, J M Quintana, K Vrotsou, A Bilbao, C Herrera-Espiñeira, L Garcia-Perez, F Aizpuru, C Sarasqueta.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify new cut-off values beyond which patients can be considered as satisfied or as responders through patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) and OMERACT-OARSI (Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International) set of responder criteria in total joint replacement.
METHODS: Secondary analysis of a 1-year prospective multicenter study of 861 patients, 510 with total knee replacement (TKR) and 351 with total hip prosthesis (THR). Pain and function data were collected by the reverse scoring option of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). PASS values were identified with the 25th centile estimation using an anchoring question about satisfaction with actual symptoms. OMERACT-OARSI set of responder criteria was based on a combination of absolute and relative change of pain, function and global patient's assessment. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used as a complementary approach.
RESULTS: The values for PASS were about 80 and 69 for pain and function in THR, while these values were 80 and 68 when using OMERACT-OARSI criteria. Regarding TKR, PASS values were about 75 and 67 in pain and function with both criteria. ROC values were slightly lower in all cases. PASS and OMERACT-OARSI values varied moderately across tertiles of baseline severity.
CONCLUSION: With the provided data we can establish when a patient can be considered as satisfied/responder in joint replacement. The scores achieved at 1 year were very similar according to both criteria.
Copyright © 2011 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22155074     DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2011.11.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage        ISSN: 1063-4584            Impact factor:   6.576


  38 in total

1.  Validity of the French version of the Core Outcome Measures Index for low back pain patients: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Stéphane Genevay; Marc Marty; Delphine S Courvoisier; Violaine Foltz; Geneviève Mahieu; Christophe Demoulin; Agnieszka Gierasimowicz Fontana; Michael Norberg; Pierre de Goumoëns; Christine Cedraschi; Sylvie Rozenberg
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Clinical improvement and satisfaction after total joint replacement: a prospective 12-month evaluation on the patients' perspective.

Authors:  Florian D Naal; Franco M Impellizzeri; Ulrich Lenze; Vanessa Wellauer; Rüdiger von Eisenhart-Rothe; Michael Leunig
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  [Objectifying results in total knee arthroplasty: Is "patient satisfaction" adequate].

Authors:  C Kopkow; J Schmitt; E Haase; T Lange; K-P Günther; J Lützner
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Comparing the validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D-5L to the Oxford hip and knee scores and SF-12 in osteoarthritis patients 1 year following total joint replacement.

Authors:  Barbara L Conner-Spady; Deborah A Marshall; Eric Bohm; Michael J Dunbar; Tom W Noseworthy
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Using surgical appropriateness criteria to examine outcomes of total knee arthroplasty in a United States sample.

Authors:  Daniel L Riddle; Robert A Perera; William A Jiranek; Levent Dumenci
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.794

6.  Can an intensive diet and exercise program prevent knee pain among overweight adults at high risk?

Authors:  Daniel K White; Tuhina Neogi; W Jack Rejeski; Michael P Walkup; Cora E Lewis; Michael C Nevitt; Capri G Foy; David T Felson
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.794

7.  Improvement following total knee replacement surgery: Exploring preoperative symptoms and change in preoperative symptoms.

Authors:  Ernest R Vina; Michael J Hannon; C Kent Kwoh
Journal:  Semin Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 5.532

8.  Does clinically important change in function after knee replacement guarantee good absolute function? The multicenter osteoarthritis study.

Authors:  Jessica L Maxwell; David T Felson; Jingbo Niu; Barton Wise; Michael C Nevitt; Jasvinder A Singh; Laura Frey-Law; Tuhina Neogi
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 4.666

9.  Investigating the patient acceptable symptom state cut-offs: longitudinal data from a community cohort using the shoulder pain and disability index.

Authors:  Gui Tran; Bright Dube; Sarah R Kingsbury; Alan Tennant; Philip G Conaghan; Elizabeth M A Hensor
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 2.631

10.  The influence of the contralateral knee prior to knee arthroplasty on post-arthroplasty function: the multicenter osteoarthritis study.

Authors:  Jessica Maxwell; Jingbo Niu; Jasvinder A Singh; Michael C Nevitt; Laura Frey Law; David Felson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 5.284

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.