INTRODUCTION: Registries are becoming increasingly important for rare diseases as experimental therapies develop. This report describes the methodology behind the National Registry of Myotonic Dystrophy (DM) and Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy (FSHD) Patients and Family Members to facilitate the development of other rare disease registries. We also highlight data about the pathophysiology and select burdens of DM and FSHD reported at baseline and longitudinally. METHODS: The Registry consists of de-identified, patient reported information collected at baseline and annually and information from review of medical records. Investigators can use the Registry to analyze de-identified data and to facilitate recruitment into clinical studies. RESULTS: To date, the Registry has enrolled 1611 members, facilitated 24 studies, and collected data annually for up to 8 years. Genetic test results were obtained in 56.2% of enrollees. Approximately one-third of members used assistive devices and another one-third reported psychological problems at baseline. Wheelchair use was reported for both short and long distances by 7.0% of DM and 18.1% of FSHD members. Approximately 60% of members reported their employment was affected by their disease. CONCLUSIONS: Strengths of the Registry include large sample sizes, stringent review of clinical and molecular data, annually updated information, and regular interactions between patients and investigators. Registry data provide new insights into the burdens of DM and FSHD, such as, psychological problems and reduced employment. Opportunities abound for investigators to utilize Registry resources to assess the impact of these and other burdens on health care costs, progression of symptoms, and quality of life.
INTRODUCTION: Registries are becoming increasingly important for rare diseases as experimental therapies develop. This report describes the methodology behind the National Registry of Myotonic Dystrophy (DM) and Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy (FSHD) Patients and Family Members to facilitate the development of other rare disease registries. We also highlight data about the pathophysiology and select burdens of DM and FSHD reported at baseline and longitudinally. METHODS: The Registry consists of de-identified, patient reported information collected at baseline and annually and information from review of medical records. Investigators can use the Registry to analyze de-identified data and to facilitate recruitment into clinical studies. RESULTS: To date, the Registry has enrolled 1611 members, facilitated 24 studies, and collected data annually for up to 8 years. Genetic test results were obtained in 56.2% of enrollees. Approximately one-third of members used assistive devices and another one-third reported psychological problems at baseline. Wheelchair use was reported for both short and long distances by 7.0% of DM and 18.1% of FSHD members. Approximately 60% of members reported their employment was affected by their disease. CONCLUSIONS: Strengths of the Registry include large sample sizes, stringent review of clinical and molecular data, annually updated information, and regular interactions between patients and investigators. Registry data provide new insights into the burdens of DM and FSHD, such as, psychological problems and reduced employment. Opportunities abound for investigators to utilize Registry resources to assess the impact of these and other burdens on health care costs, progression of symptoms, and quality of life.
Authors: Jordi Miró; Katherine A Raichle; Gregory T Carter; Sarah A O'Brien; Richard T Abresch; Craig M McDonald; Mark P Jensen Journal: Am J Hosp Palliat Care Date: 2009-05-04 Impact factor: 2.500
Authors: L L Bachinski; T Czernuszewicz; L S Ramagli; T Suominen; M D Shriver; B Udd; M J Siciliano; R Krahe Journal: Neurology Date: 2008-11-19 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: James E Hilbert; Tetsuo Ashizawa; John W Day; Elizabeth A Luebbe; William B Martens; Michael P McDermott; Rabi Tawil; Charles A Thornton; Richard T Moxley Journal: J Neurol Date: 2013-06-27 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Chad Heatwole; Rita Bode; Nicholas E Johnson; Jeanne Dekdebrun; Nuran Dilek; Katy Eichinger; James E Hilbert; Eric Logigian; Elizabeth Luebbe; William Martens; Michael P Mcdermott; Shree Pandya; Araya Puwanant; Nan Rothrock; Charles Thornton; Barbara G Vickrey; David Victorson; Richard T Moxley Journal: Muscle Nerve Date: 2015-12-29 Impact factor: 3.217
Authors: Bryan P Fitzgerald; Kelly M Conn; Joanne Smith; Andrew Walker; Amy L Parkhill; James E Hilbert; Elizabeth A Luebbe; Richard T Moxley Journal: J Neurol Date: 2016-10-12 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Nicholas E Johnson; Anne-Berit Ekstrom; Craig Campbell; Man Hung; Heather R Adams; Wei Chen; Elizabeth Luebbe; James Hilbert; Richard T Moxley; Chad R Heatwole Journal: Dev Med Child Neurol Date: 2015-10-28 Impact factor: 5.449
Authors: Michele A Scully; Valerie A Cwik; Bruce C Marshall; Emma Ciafaloni; Jodi M Wolff; Thomas S Getchius; Robert C Griggs Journal: Neurology Date: 2013-02-05 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Davide Pareyson; Pietro Fratta; Pierre-François Pradat; Gianni Sorarù; Josef Finsterer; John Vissing; Manu E Jokela; Bjarne Udd; Albert C Ludolph; Anna Sagnelli; Patrick Weydt Journal: J Mol Neurosci Date: 2016-01-07 Impact factor: 3.444
Authors: Lisa Kalman; Jack Tarleton; Monica Hitch; Madhuri Hegde; Nick Hjelm; Elizabeth Berry-Kravis; Lili Zhou; James E Hilbert; Elizabeth A Luebbe; Richard T Moxley; Lorraine Toji Journal: J Mol Diagn Date: 2013-05-13 Impact factor: 5.568