Literature DB >> 22153513

Short-term consumption of sucralose, a nonnutritive sweetener, is similar to water with regard to select markers of hunger signaling and short-term glucose homeostasis in women.

Andrew W Brown1, Michelle M Bohan Brown, Kristine L Onken, Donald C Beitz.   

Abstract

Nonnutritive sweeteners have been used to lower the energy density of foods with the intention of affecting weight loss or weight maintenance. However, some epidemiological and animal evidence indicates an association between weight gain or insulin resistance and artificial sweetener consumption. In the present study, we hypothesized that the nonnutritive sweetener sucralose, a trichlorinated sucrose molecule, would elicit responses similar to water but different from sucrose and sucrose combined with sucralose on subjective and hormonal indications of hunger and short-term glucose homeostasis. Eight female volunteers (body mass index, 22.16 ± 1.71 kg/m(2); age, 21.75 ± 2.25 years) consumed sucrose and/or sucralose in water in a factorial design. Blood samples were taken at fasting and 30 and 60 minutes after treatment followed by a standardized breakfast across treatments, and blood samples were taken 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes after breakfast. Plasma was analyzed for glucose, insulin, glucagon, triacylglycerols (TAG), and acylated ghrelin. Perceptions of hunger and other subjective measurements were assessed before each blood sample. No differences were detected in subjective responses, circulating triacylglycerol, or glucagon concentrations among treatments over time. Significant differences were observed in insulin, glucose, and acylated ghrelin concentrations over time only between sucrose-containing treatments and non-sucrose-containing treatments regardless of sucralose consumption. Therefore, sucralose may be a relatively inert nonnutritive sweetener with regard to hunger signaling and short-term glucose homeostasis.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22153513     DOI: 10.1016/j.nutres.2011.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nutr Res        ISSN: 0271-5317            Impact factor:   3.315


  25 in total

Review 1.  An application of Pavlovian principles to the problems of obesity and cognitive decline.

Authors:  T L Davidson; C H Sample; S E Swithers
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 2.877

2.  Dessert formulation using sucralose and dextrin affects favorably postprandial response to glucose, insulin, and C-peptide in type 2 diabetic patients.

Authors:  Konstantina Argyri; Alexios Sotiropoulos; Eirini Psarou; Athanasia Papazafiropoulou; Antonios Zampelas; Maria Kapsokefalou
Journal:  Rev Diabet Stud       Date:  2013-05-10

3.  Short-Term Consumption of Sucralose with, but Not without, Carbohydrate Impairs Neural and Metabolic Sensitivity to Sugar in Humans.

Authors:  Jelle R Dalenberg; Barkha P Patel; Raphael Denis; Maria G Veldhuizen; Yuko Nakamura; Petra C Vinke; Serge Luquet; Dana M Small
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 27.287

Review 4.  Non-nutritive Sweeteners and Glycaemic Control.

Authors:  Yoona Kim; Jennifer B Keogh; Peter M Clifton
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 5.113

5.  Artificial sweeteners produce the counterintuitive effect of inducing metabolic derangements.

Authors:  Susan E Swithers
Journal:  Trends Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 12.015

Review 6.  Metabolic effects of non-nutritive sweeteners.

Authors:  M Yanina Pepino
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2015-06-19

7.  Inhibition of sweet chemosensory receptors alters insulin responses during glucose ingestion in healthy adults: a randomized crossover interventional study.

Authors:  Elnaz Karimian Azari; Kathleen R Smith; Fanchao Yi; Timothy F Osborne; Roberto Bizzotto; Andrea Mari; Richard E Pratley; George A Kyriazis
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 8.  Non-nutritive sweeteners and their role in the gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  Rebecca J Brown; Kristina I Rother
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 9.  High versus low-added sugar consumption for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Sara Bergwall; Anna Johansson; Emily Sonestedt; Stefan Acosta
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-01-05

Review 10.  Sucralose and Cardiometabolic Health: Current Understanding from Receptors to Clinical Investigations.

Authors:  Sydney Risdon; Sylvain Battault; Alonso Romo-Romo; Matthieu Roustit; Loic Briand; Grégory Meyer; Paloma Almeda-Valdes; Guillaume Walther
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 8.701

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.