Literature DB >> 22151729

A prospective, open-label, multicenter study to assess the efficacy of spinal cord stimulation and identify patients who would benefit.

Kazuhide Moriyama1, Kazushige Murakawa, Takeshi Uno, Kiyoshige Oseto, Minoru Kawanishi, Yoichi Saito, Takaomi Taira, Masanori Yamauchi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify patients likely to benefit from spinal cord stimulation (SCS).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This multicenter, prospective, open-label study included medical centers experienced in SCS therapy, carried out in 13 physicians in seven centers. We recruited 55 patients with complex regional pain syndrome, failed back surgery syndrome, or peripheral vascular disease. Neurostimulators were implanted in 34 patients found to respond to SCS in a preliminary test, who were then followed for six months. Thirty-four patients scored their pain on a visual analog scale (VAS) and completed the EuroQol-5D questionnaire before and after test stimulation and after one and six months.
RESULTS: During test stimulation, the mean VAS and quality of life (QOL) scores improved from 74.0 to 23.4 and from 0.430 to 0.664, respectively, in the 34 patients. At six months, the mean VAS score was 29.7 in 29 patients and the mean QOL score was 0.661 in 31 patients.
CONCLUSION: SCS may improve pain management and QOL.
© 2011 International Neuromodulation Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22151729     DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2011.00411.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuromodulation        ISSN: 1094-7159


  8 in total

1.  A case series of new radicular pain following the insertion of spinal cord stimulator.

Authors:  Ganesan Baranidharan; Beatrice Bretherton; Sheila Black
Journal:  Br J Pain       Date:  2022-04-18

Review 2.  Spinal cord stimulation for intractable chronic pain.

Authors:  Leonardo Kapural
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2014-04

3.  Dorsal column stimulator applications.

Authors:  Claudio Yampolsky; Santiago Hem; Damián Bendersky
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2012-10-31

4.  Acute Neuropathic Orchalgia and Scrotalgia After Percutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Placement: Two Cases with an Unusual Complication.

Authors:  Meng Huang; Virendra R Desai; David Ho; Richard K Simpson
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2017-01-30

5.  Does a Screening Trial for Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients with Chronic Pain of Neuropathic Origin have Clinical Utility and Cost-Effectiveness? (TRIAL-STIM Study): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Sam Eldabe; Ashish Gulve; Simon Thomson; Ganesan Baranidharan; Rui Duarte; Susan Jowett; Harbinder Sandhu; Raymond Chadwick; Morag Brookes; Anisah Tariq; Jenny Earle; Jill Bell; Anu Kansal; Shelley Rhodes; Rod S Taylor
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Activation of Neuroinflammation via mTOR Pathway is Disparately Regulated by Differential Target Multiplexed and Traditional Low-Rate Spinal Cord Stimulation in a Neuropathic Pain Model.

Authors:  Dana M Tilley; Ricardo Vallejo; Francesco Vetri; David C Platt; David L Cedeno
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 2.832

Review 7.  A review of spinal cord stimulation systems for chronic pain.

Authors:  Paul Verrills; Chantelle Sinclair; Adele Barnard
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 3.133

Review 8.  How to Restart the Interventional Activity in the COVID-19 Era: The Experience of a Private Pain Unit in Spain.

Authors:  David Abejón; Eva M Monzón; Tim Deer; Jonathan M Hagedorn; Ricardo Araujo; Cristina Abad; Alberto Rios; Alejandro Zamora; Ricardo Vallejo
Journal:  Pain Pract       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 3.079

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.