Literature DB >> 22151202

Physiology of spinal cord stimulation: review and update.

B Linderoth1, R D Foreman.   

Abstract

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) was an outgrowth of the well-known gate control theory presented by Melzack and Wall in 1965. Although the method has been used to treat chronic severe pain for more than three decades, very little was known about the physiological and biochemical mechanisms behind the beneficial effects until recently. We now know that SCS activates several different mechanisms to treat different types of pain such as neuropathic and ischemic. In general, these mechanisms seem most dependent on activation of only a few segments of the spinal cord. However, both animal studies and human observations have indicated that supraspinal circuits may contribute as well. In the treatment of neuropathic pain, intermittent SCS may give several hours of pain relief after cessation of the stimulation. This protracted effect indicates long-lasting modulation of neural activity involving changes in the local transmitter systems in the dorsal horns. In ischemic pain, animal experiments demonstrate that inhibition of afferent activity in the spinothalamic tracts, long-term suppression of sympathetic activity, and antidromic effects on peripheral reflex circuits may take part in the pain alleviation. Moderate SCS intensities seem to evoke sympathetic inhibition, but higher stimulation intensities may induce antidromically mediated release of vasoactive substances, eg, the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), resulting in peripheral vasodilation. The anti-ischemic effect of SCS in angina pectoris due to intermittent coronary ischemia probably occurs because application of SCS appears to result in a redistribution of cardiac blood supply, as well as a decrease in tissue oxygen demand. Recent studies indicate that SCS modulates the activity of cardiac intrinsic neurons thereby restricting the arrythmogenic consequences of intermittent local coronary ischemia. The present state of knowledge is briefly reviewed and recent research directions outlined.

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 22151202     DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1403.1999.00150.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuromodulation        ISSN: 1094-7159


  46 in total

1.  Failed back surgery syndrome: a suggested algorithm of care.

Authors:  Praveen Ganty; Manohar Sharma
Journal:  Br J Pain       Date:  2012-11

2.  Neuromodulation of thoracic intraspinal visceroreceptive transmission by electrical stimulation of spinal dorsal column and somatic afferents in rats.

Authors:  Chao Qin; Jay P Farber; Bengt Linderoth; Abdul Shahid; R D Foreman
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 5.820

3.  Modulation of neuronal activity in dorsal column nuclei by upper cervical spinal cord stimulation in rats.

Authors:  C Qin; X Yang; M Wu; J P Farber; B Linderoth; R D Foreman
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 4.  An overview of treatment approaches for chronic pain management.

Authors:  Nicholas Hylands-White; Rui V Duarte; Jon H Raphael
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 5.  Supraspinal Mechanisms of Spinal Cord Stimulation for Modulation of Pain: Five Decades of Research and Prospects for the Future.

Authors:  Eellan Sivanesan; Dermot P Maher; Srinivasa N Raja; Bengt Linderoth; Yun Guan
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  [Spinal cord stimulation in Failed-Back-Surgery-Syndrome. Preliminary study for the evaluation of therapy by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)].

Authors:  D Rasche; S Siebert; C Stippich; B Kress; E Nennig; K Sartor; V M Tronnier
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 7.  Stimulation methods for neuropathic pain control.

Authors:  M P Stojanovic
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2001-04

8.  Modulation of activity and conduction in single dorsal column axons by kilohertz-frequency spinal cord stimulation.

Authors:  Nathan D Crosby; John J Janik; Warren M Grill
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 9.  Spinal cord stimulation for patients with inoperable chronic critical leg ischemia.

Authors:  Xiao-Pei Chen; Wei-Min Fu; Wei Gu
Journal:  World J Emerg Med       Date:  2011

10.  Extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and protein kinase B (AKT) pathways involved in spinal cord stimulation (SCS)-induced vasodilation.

Authors:  Mingyuan Wu; Naoka Komori; Chao Qin; Jay P Farber; Bengt Linderoth; Robert D Foreman
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-01-12       Impact factor: 3.252

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.