BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To analyze previously established gender differences in cervical artery dissection (CeAD). METHODS: This case-control study is based on the CADISP (Cervical Artery Dissection and Ischemic Stroke Patients) population comprising 983 consecutive CeAD patients (mean age: 44.1 ± 9.9 years) and 658 control patients with a non-CeAD ischemic stroke (IS) (44.5 ± 10.5 years). RESULTS: Cervical artery dissection was more common in men (56.7% vs. 43.3%, P < 0.001) and men were older (46.4 vs. 41.0 years, P < 0.001). We assessed putative risk factors for CeAD including vascular risk factors, recent cervical trauma, pregnancies, and infections. All gender differences in the putative risk factors and outcome were similar in the CeAD and the non-CeAD IS groups. CONCLUSION: Our analysis of the largest collection of CeAD patients to date confirms male predominance and differences in age at dissection between men and women. Gender differences in putative risk factors may explain the higher frequency of CeAD in men and their older age, but the putative risk factors are probably not specific for CeAD.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To analyze previously established gender differences in cervical artery dissection (CeAD). METHODS: This case-control study is based on the CADISP (Cervical Artery Dissection and Ischemic StrokePatients) population comprising 983 consecutive CeAD patients (mean age: 44.1 ± 9.9 years) and 658 control patients with a non-CeAD ischemic stroke (IS) (44.5 ± 10.5 years). RESULTS: Cervical artery dissection was more common in men (56.7% vs. 43.3%, P < 0.001) and men were older (46.4 vs. 41.0 years, P < 0.001). We assessed putative risk factors for CeAD including vascular risk factors, recent cervical trauma, pregnancies, and infections. All gender differences in the putative risk factors and outcome were similar in the CeAD and the non-CeAD IS groups. CONCLUSION: Our analysis of the largest collection of CeAD patients to date confirms male predominance and differences in age at dissection between men and women. Gender differences in putative risk factors may explain the higher frequency of CeAD in men and their older age, but the putative risk factors are probably not specific for CeAD.
Authors: Barbara Goeggel Simonetti; Mubeen F Rafay; Melissa Chung; Warren D Lo; Lauren A Beslow; Lori L Billinghurst; Christine K Fox; Alberto Pagnamenta; Maja Steinlin; Mark T Mackay Journal: Neurology Date: 2019-12-19 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: N Giannini; L Ulivi; M Maccarrone; V Montano; G Orlandi; E Ferrari; C Cravcenco; U Bonuccelli; M Mancuso Journal: Neurol Sci Date: 2017-08-16 Impact factor: 3.307
Authors: J Scott McNally; Peter J Hinckley; Akihiko Sakata; Laura B Eisenmenger; Seong-Eun Kim; Adam H De Havenon; Edward P Quigley; Eli Iacob; Gerald S Treiman; Dennis L Parker Journal: Stroke Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Xuemei Cai; Ali Razmara; Jessica K Paulus; Karen Switkowski; Pari J Fariborz; Sergey D Goryachev; Leonard D'Avolio; Edward Feldmann; David E Thaler Journal: J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2014-07-30 Impact factor: 2.136
Authors: Yahya B Atalay; Pirouz Piran; Abhinaba Chatterjee; Santosh Murthy; Babak B Navi; Ava L Liberman; Joseph Dardick; Cenai Zhang; Hooman Kamel; Alexander E Merkler Journal: Neurology Date: 2021-01-04 Impact factor: 9.910