Literature DB >> 22150460

Impact of acetaldehyde- and pyruvic acid-bound sulphur dioxide on wine lactic acid bacteria.

A Wells1, J P Osborne.   

Abstract

AIMS: To investigate the impact of acetaldehyde- and pyruvic acid-bound sulphur dioxide on wine lactic acid bacteria (LAB). METHODS AND
RESULTS: Growth studies were performed where Oenococcus oeni, Pediococcus parvulus, Ped. damnosus and Lactobacillus hilgardii were inoculated into media containing various concentrations of acetaldehyde or pyruvic acid and an equimolar concentration of SO(2) at pH 3.50 and 3.70. Low concentrations of acetaldehyde- and pyruvic acid-bound SO(2) were inhibitory to the growth of all bacteria although acetaldehyde-bound SO(2) was generally more inhibitory than pyruvic acid-bound SO(2). Inhibition was greater at pH 3.50 than 3.70, and Lact. hilgardii was the most sensitive to acetaldehyde-bound SO(2), while O. oeni was the most sensitive to pyruvic acid-bound SO(2). Degradation of SO(2)-bound acetaldehyde was observed for all LAB, and aside from O. oeni, there was also complete degradation of SO(2)-bound pyruvic acid at both pH values. O. oeni only degraded pyruvic acid at pH 3.70. Degradation of SO(2)-bound acetaldehyde or pyruvic acid did not correlate with bacterial growth as inhibition was always observed in media containing bound SO(2).
CONCLUSIONS: Acetaldehyde- and pyruvic acid-bound SO(2) were inhibitory to wine LAB growth at concentrations as low as 5 mg l(-1). Despite this inhibition, all wine LAB degraded SO(2)-bound acetaldehyde and pyruvic acid suggesting that bound SO(2) may have a bacteriostatic rather than bacteriocidal action. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Sulphur dioxide bound to acetaldehyde or pyruvic acid is inhibitory to growth of wine LAB and must be considered when conducting the malolactic fermentation or controlling the growth of spoilage bacteria such as Pediococcus and Lactobacillus.
© 2011 The Authors. Letters in Applied Microbiology © 2011 The Society for Applied Microbiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22150460     DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2011.03193.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 0266-8254            Impact factor:   2.858


  5 in total

Review 1.  [Update on the pharmacology and effects of local anesthetics].

Authors:  J Ahrens; A Leffler
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  In silico Logistic Model for Table Olive Related Microorganisms As a Function of Sodium Metabisulphite, Cinnamaldehyde, pH, and Type of Acidifying Agent.

Authors:  Verónica Romero-Gil; Antonio Garrido-Fernández; Francisco N Arroyo-López
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 5.640

3.  Study of carbonyl compounds in white wine production.

Authors:  Jakub Herzan; Kamil Prokes; Mojmir Baron; Michal Kumsta; Pavel Pavlousek; Jiri Sochor
Journal:  Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2020-09-27       Impact factor: 2.863

4.  Analysis of Transcriptomic Response to SO2 by Oenococcus oeni Growing in Continuous Culture.

Authors:  Cristobal A Onetto; Peter J Costello; Radka Kolouchova; Charlotte Jordans; Jane McCarthy; Simon A Schmidt
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2021-10-06

5.  Influence of the temperature and the origin of CO2 (anaerobiosis methodology) on the intracellular fermentation of wines made by carbonic maceration.

Authors:  Pilar Santamaría; Lucía González-Arenzana; Rocío Escribano-Viana; Patrocinio Garijo; Susana Sanz; Ana Rosa Gutiérrez
Journal:  J Sci Food Agric       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 4.125

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.