Literature DB >> 22150115

Submandibular gland-sparing intensity modulated radiotherapy in the treatment of head and neck cancer: sites of locoregional relapse and survival.

Juhani Collan1, Mika Kapanen, Antti Mäkitie, Heidi Nyman, Heikki Joensuu, Mikko Tenhunen, Kauko Saarilahti.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: To evaluate the patterns of locoregional relapse and survival following submandibular gland (SMG)-sparing intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty patients with laryngeal (n = 15), oropharyngeal (n = 50), hypopharyngeal (n = 11) or nasopharyngeal cancer (n = 4) were treated by submandibular gland-sparing IMRT for head and neck squamous cell cancer between July 2000 and December 2008. All patients were treated by bilateral IMRT. Thirty-nine (49%) received definitive radiotherapy (RT) and 41 (51%) postoperative RT. The contralateral parotid gland (PG) and SMG were included in the dose optimization planning program with intent to keep the mean doses for PG and SMG below 23 Gy and 28-30 Gy, respectively. The ipsilateral glands were also spared when considered feasible.
RESULTS: During a median follow-up time of 51 months (range, 24-117 months) nine local recurrent tumors were observed. Four of these nine patients were salvaged by surgery with no further recurrence. All local recurrences were located within the high-dose CTVs. None of the locally recurrent cancers were located at the vicinity of the spared PGs or SMGs. No recurrent tumors were observed in the contralateral neck. The Kaplan-Meier estimate for local control at five years following IMRT was 88% for the whole cohort and the corresponding figure for local control following salvage surgery was 94%. The estimates for five-year overall survival and disease-specific survival were 85% and 90%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: In selected head and neck cancer patients who are estimated to have a low risk of cancer recurrence at the nodal levels I-II and who are treated with SMG-sparing IMRT the risk of cancer recurrence at the vicinity of the spared salivary glands is low.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22150115     DOI: 10.3109/0284186X.2011.640348

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  7 in total

1.  Patterns of failure in patients with head and neck carcinoma of unknown primary treated with radiation therapy.

Authors:  John Cuaron; Shyam Rao; Suzanne Wolden; Michael Zelefsky; Karen Schupak; Borys Mychalczak; Nancy Lee
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 3.147

2.  Sparing level Ib lymph nodes by intensity-modulated radiotherapy in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Jing Chen; Dan Ou; Xiayun He; Chaosu Hu
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 3.  Use of the facial artery-based cutaneous island flap (melo-labial flap) for reconstruction of the neopharynx following total laryngectomy: a novel technique.

Authors:  Devendra Kumar Gupta; Rajeev Chugh; Sanajeet Kumar Singh; Seema Pati
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2019-08-04

4.  Submandibular gland-sparing radiation therapy for locally advanced oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: patterns of failure and xerostomia outcomes.

Authors:  Michael F Gensheimer; Jay J Liao; Adam S Garden; George E Laramore; Upendra Parvathaneni
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  Comparison of treatment techniques for reduction in the submandibular gland dose: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Christopher Hoyne; Marcus Dreosti; John Shakeshaft; Siddartha Baxi
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2017-02-27

6.  Salivary gland-sparing other than parotid-sparing in definitive head-and-neck intensity-modulated radiotherapy does not seem to jeopardize local control.

Authors:  Enrique Chajon; Caroline Lafond; Guillaume Louvel; Joël Castelli; Danièle Williaume; Olivier Henry; Franck Jégoux; Elodie Vauléon; Jean-Pierre Manens; Elisabeth Le Prisé; Renaud de Crevoisier
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  Clinical and dosimetric risk stratification for patients at high-risk of feeding tube use during definitive IMRT for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  James E Jackson; Nigel J Anderson; Morikatsu Wada; Michal Schneider; Michael Poulsen; Maureen Rolfo; Maziar Fahandej; Hui Gan; Daryl Lim Joon; Vincent Khoo
Journal:  Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-02-28
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.