Literature DB >> 22148948

Preschoolers are able to take merit into account when distributing goods.

Nicolas Baumard1, Olivier Mascaro, Coralie Chevallier.   

Abstract

Classic studies in developmental psychology demonstrate a relatively late development of equity, with children as old as 6 or even 8-10 years failing to follow the logic of merit--that is, giving more to those who contributed more. Following Piaget (1932), these studies have been taken to indicate that judgments of justice develop slowly and follow a stagelike progression, starting off with simple rules (e.g., equality: everyone receives the same) and only later on in development evolving into more complex ones (e.g., equity: distributions match contributions). Here, we report 2 experiments with 3- and 4-year-old children (N = 195) that contradict this constructivist account. Our results demonstrate that children as young as 3 years old are able to take merit into account by distributing tokens according to individual contributions but that this ability may be hidden by a preference for equality. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22148948     DOI: 10.1037/a0026598

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Psychol        ISSN: 0012-1649


  33 in total

1.  Theory of mind is related to children's resource allocations in gender stereotypic contexts.

Authors:  Michael T Rizzo; Melanie Killen
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2017-10-30

2.  'To the victor go the spoils': Infants expect resources to align with dominance structures.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Enright; Hyowon Gweon; Jessica A Sommerville
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2017-03-24

3.  Social disappointment explains chimpanzees' behaviour in the inequity aversion task.

Authors:  Jan M Engelmann; Jeremy B Clift; Esther Herrmann; Michael Tomasello
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Children's recognition of fairness and others' welfare in a resource allocation task: Age related changes.

Authors:  Michael T Rizzo; Laura Elenbaas; Shelby Cooley; Melanie Killen
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2016-08

5.  Rectifying social inequalities in a resource allocation task.

Authors:  Laura Elenbaas; Michael T Rizzo; Shelby Cooley; Melanie Killen
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2016-07-15

6.  Theory of Mind and Resource Allocation in the Context of Hidden Inequality.

Authors:  Leon Li; Michael T Rizzo; Amanda R Burkholder; Melanie Killen
Journal:  Cogn Dev       Date:  2017-02-24

7.  Children's reasoning about distributive and retributive justice across development.

Authors:  Craig E Smith; Felix Warneken
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2016-02-04

8.  Children's understanding of equity in the context of inequality.

Authors:  Michael T Rizzo; Melanie Killen
Journal:  Br J Dev Psychol       Date:  2016-06-17

9.  Moral Reasoning Enables Developmental and Societal Change.

Authors:  Melanie Killen; Audun Dahl
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-02-23

10.  Theory of Mind and Moral Decision-Making in the Context of Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  Jessica E Ringshaw; Katie Hamilton; Susan Malcolm-Smith
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2021-06-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.