BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate global quantitation of cardiac uptake on I-123 mIBG SPECT. METHODS: The study included a pilot group of 67 subjects and a validation group of 1,051 subjects. SPECT images were reconstructed by filtered backprojection, ordered subsets expectation maximization, and deconvolution of septal penetration, respectively. SPECT heart-to-mediastinum ratio (H/M) was calculated by comparing the mean counts between heart and mediastinum volumes of interest drawn on transaxial images. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to assess the capability of each SPECT method to differentiate the heart disease subjects from controls in comparison with that of the planar H/M. RESULTS: In the validation group, the areas under the ROC curves were not significantly different between the SPECT and planar H/M. Order subsets expectation maximization had significantly larger area under the ROC curve than the other two SPECT methods. CONCLUSION: H/M obtained from I-123 mIBG SPECT was equivalent to the planar H/M for differentiating between subjects with normal and abnormal mIBG uptake. Global quantification of cardiac I-123 mIBG SPECT may represent a viable alternative to the planar H/M.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate global quantitation of cardiac uptake on I-123mIBG SPECT. METHODS: The study included a pilot group of 67 subjects and a validation group of 1,051 subjects. SPECT images were reconstructed by filtered backprojection, ordered subsets expectation maximization, and deconvolution of septal penetration, respectively. SPECT heart-to-mediastinum ratio (H/M) was calculated by comparing the mean counts between heart and mediastinum volumes of interest drawn on transaxial images. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to assess the capability of each SPECT method to differentiate the heart disease subjects from controls in comparison with that of the planar H/M. RESULTS: In the validation group, the areas under the ROC curves were not significantly different between the SPECT and planar H/M. Order subsets expectation maximization had significantly larger area under the ROC curve than the other two SPECT methods. CONCLUSION: H/M obtained from I-123mIBG SPECT was equivalent to the planar H/M for differentiating between subjects with normal and abnormal mIBG uptake. Global quantification of cardiac I-123mIBG SPECT may represent a viable alternative to the planar H/M.
Authors: Maureen M Henneman; Frank M Bengel; Ernst E van der Wall; Juhani Knuuti; Jeroen J Bax Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2008-04-16 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: P Merlet; C Benvenuti; D Moyse; F Pouillart; J L Dubois-Randé; A M Duval; D Loisance; A Castaigne; A Syrota Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 1999-06 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: T Nakata; K Miyamoto; A Doi; H Sasao; T Wakabayashi; H Kobayashi; K Tsuchihashi; K Shimamoto Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 1998 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: A Cohen-Solal; Y Esanu; D Logeart; F Pessione; C Dubois; G Dreyfus; R Gourgon; P Merlet Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1999-03 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Paul A Gould; Grace Kong; Victor Kalff; Stephen J Duffy; Andrew J Taylor; Michael J Kelly; David M Kaye Journal: Europace Date: 2007-05-21 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Yanli Zhou; Weihua Zhou; Russell D Folks; Daya N Manatunga; Arnold F Jacobson; Jeroen J Bax; Ernest V Garcia; Ji Chen Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2014-05-24 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Milena J Henzlova; W Lane Duvall; Andrew J Einstein; Mark I Travin; Hein J Verberne Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Ian P Clements; Ernest V Garcia; Ji Chen; Russell D Folks; Javed Butler; Arnold F Jacobson Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2015-03-19 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Arnold F Jacobson; Ji Chen; Liudmilla Verdes; Russell D Folks; Daya N Manatunga; Ernest V Garcia Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2013-03-13 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Matthew W Parker; Nitesh Sood; Alan W Ahlberg; Arnold F Jacobson; Gary V Heller; Justin B Lundbye Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2014-06-11 Impact factor: 9.236