PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of a T2-weighted SPACE sequence (T2w-SPACE) to assess carotid stenosis via several methods and compare its performance with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (ceMRA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients with carotid atherosclerosis underwent dark blood (DB)-MRI using a 3D turbo spin echo with variable flip angles sequence (T2w-SPACE) and ceMRA. Images were coregistered and evaluated by two observers. Comparisons were made for luminal diameter, luminal area, degree of luminal stenosis (NASCET: North American Symptomatic Endarterectomy Trial; ECST: European Carotid Surgery Trial, and area stenosis), and vessel wall area. Degree of NASCET stenosis was clinically classified as mild (<50%), moderate (50%-69%), or severe (>69%). RESULTS: Excellent agreement was seen between ceMRA and T2w-SPACE and between observers for assessment of lumen diameter, lumen area, vessel wall area, and degree of NASCET stenosis (r > 0.80, P < 0.001). ECST stenosis was consistently higher than NASCET stenosis (48 ± 14% vs. 24 ± 22%, P < 0.001). Area stenosis (72 ± 2%) was significantly higher (P < 0.001) than both ESCT and NASCET stenosis. CONCLUSION: DB-MRI of carotid arteries using T2w-SPACE is clinically feasible. It provides accurate measurements of lumen size and degree of stenosis in comparison with ceMRA and offers a more reproducible measure of ECST stenosis than ceMRA.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of a T2-weighted SPACE sequence (T2w-SPACE) to assess carotid stenosis via several methods and compare its performance with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (ceMRA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients with carotid atherosclerosis underwent dark blood (DB)-MRI using a 3D turbo spin echo with variable flip angles sequence (T2w-SPACE) and ceMRA. Images were coregistered and evaluated by two observers. Comparisons were made for luminal diameter, luminal area, degree of luminal stenosis (NASCET: North American Symptomatic Endarterectomy Trial; ECST: European Carotid Surgery Trial, and area stenosis), and vessel wall area. Degree of NASCET stenosis was clinically classified as mild (<50%), moderate (50%-69%), or severe (>69%). RESULTS: Excellent agreement was seen between ceMRA and T2w-SPACE and between observers for assessment of lumen diameter, lumen area, vessel wall area, and degree of NASCET stenosis (r > 0.80, P < 0.001). ECST stenosis was consistently higher than NASCET stenosis (48 ± 14% vs. 24 ± 22%, P < 0.001). Area stenosis (72 ± 2%) was significantly higher (P < 0.001) than both ESCT and NASCET stenosis. CONCLUSION: DB-MRI of carotid arteries using T2w-SPACE is clinically feasible. It provides accurate measurements of lumen size and degree of stenosis in comparison with ceMRA and offers a more reproducible measure of ECST stenosis than ceMRA.
Authors: Tobias Saam; Thomas S Hatsukami; Norihide Takaya; Baocheng Chu; Hunter Underhill; William S Kerwin; Jianming Cai; Marina S Ferguson; Chun Yuan Journal: Radiology Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: H J M Barnett; D W Taylor; R B Haynes; D L Sackett; S J Peerless; G G Ferguson; A J Fox; R N Rankin; V C Hachinski; D O Wiebers; M Eliasziw Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1991-08-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: H J Barnett; D W Taylor; M Eliasziw; A J Fox; G G Ferguson; R B Haynes; R N Rankin; G P Clagett; V C Hachinski; D L Sackett; K E Thorpe; H E Meldrum; J D Spence Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1998-11-12 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Subha V Raman; Travis P Sharkey-Toppen; Tam Tran; Jim X Liu; Beth McCarthy; Xin He; Suzanne Smart; Martha Gulati; Randell Wexler; Orlando P Simonetti; Rebecca D Jackson Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2015-03-20 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: Monica Sigovan; Clément Bidet; Sébastien Bros; Loic Boussel; Laura Mechtouff; Philip M Robson; Zahi A Fayad; Antoine Millon; Philippe Douek Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2017-06-16 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Marshall W Winner; Travis Sharkey-Toppen; Xiaolan Zhang; Michael L Pennell; Orlando P Simonetti; Jay L Zweier; Patrick S Vaccaro; Subha V Raman Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2014-03-24 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: A Hakim; C Kurmann; K Pospieszny; T R Meinel; M A Shahin; M R Heldner; R Umarova; S Jung; M Arnold; M El-Koussy Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2022-05-26 Impact factor: 4.966
Authors: Martin J Willemink; Bram F Coolen; Hadrien Dyvorne; Philip M Robson; Ilda Bander; Seigo Ishino; Alison Pruzan; Arthi Sridhar; Bei Zhang; Priti Balchandani; Venkatesh Mani; Gustav J Strijkers; Aart J Nederveen; Tim Leiner; Zahi A Fayad; Willem J M Mulder; Claudia Calcagno Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-12-14 Impact factor: 3.240