Literature DB >> 22147227

Effects of different surface treatments and accelerated artificial aging on the bond strength of composite resin repairs.

Marco Aurélio Veiga de Melo1, Marcos Ribeiro Moysés, Saulo Galvão dos Santos, Carlos Eduardo Pinto Alcântara, José Carlos Rabelo Ribeiro.   

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to assess the bond strength of composite resin repairs subjected to different surface treatments and accelerated artificial aging. 192 cylindrical samples (CSs) were prepared and divided into 24 groups (n = 8). Half of the CSs were stored in water for 24 h, and the other half were subjected to C-UV accelerated aging for non-metallic specimens. The treatments were phosphoric acid + silane + adhesive (PSA); phosphoric acid + adhesive (PA); diamond bur + phosphoric acid + silane + adhesive (DPSA); diamond bur + phosphoric acid + adhesive (DPA); air abrasion + phosphoric acid + silane + adhesive (APSA); and air abrasion + phosphoric acid + adhesive (APA). The repair was performed and the specimens were again aged as described above. A control group (n = 8) was established and did not receive any type of aging or surface treatment. The specimens were loaded to failure in shear mode with a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min until fracture. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA/Tukey's test (p < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were found among DPSA, DPA, APSA, APA, and the control group. The aged PSA and PA achieved low bonding values and were statistically different from the control group, whereas the non-aged PSA and PA presented no statistically significant difference from the control group. Repairs with the proposed surface treatments were viable on both recent and aged restorations; however, phosphoric acid + adhesive alone were effective only on recent restorations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22147227     DOI: 10.1590/s1806-83242011000600003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz Oral Res        ISSN: 1806-8324


  11 in total

1.  The Effect of Different Powers of Er:YAG Laser Treatment on Surface Morphology of an Indirect Composite Resin: SEM Evaluation.

Authors:  Nazanin Zeinab Garshasbzadeh; Mansoreh Mirzaie; Esmael Yassini; Sima Shahabi; Nasim Chiniforush
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2014

2.  Microtensile Repair Bond Strength of a Composite After Accelerated Artificial Aging: Effect of the Air Abrasion, Bur, Er:YAG Laser, Two-Step Self-etch Bonding, and Universal Bonding Repair System.

Authors:  Marie Rashidi; Simin Berangi; Nasim Chiniforush; Elham Ahmadi; Ladan Ranjbar Omrani
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2022-04-25

3.  New Experimental Zirconia-Reinforced Rice Husk Nanohybrid Composite and the Outcome of Its Surface Roughness and Microhardness in Comparison with Commercialized Nanofilled and Microhybrid Composite Resins.

Authors:  Galvin Sim Siang Lin; Nik Rozainah Nik Abdul Ghani; Noor Huda Ismail; Kiran Singbal; Tahir Yusuf Noorani; Noraida Mamat
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2021-03-20

4.  Effect of three different antioxidants on the shear bond strength of composite resin to bleached enamel: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Rajalekshmy Subramonian; Vijay Mathai; Jeya Balaji Mano Christaine Angelo; Jotish Ravi
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr

5.  Shear Bond Strength of Repaired Composites Using Surface Treatments and Repair Materials: An In vitro Study.

Authors:  M Hemadri; G Saritha; V Rajasekhar; K Amit Pachlag; R Purushotham; Veera Kishore Kumar Reddy
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec

6.  Influences of Successive Exposure to Bleaching and Fluoride Preparations on the Surface Hardness and Roughness of the Aged Resin Composite Restoratives.

Authors:  Khalid M Abdelaziz; Shugufta Mir; Shafait Ullah Khateeb; Suheel M Baba; Saud S Alshahrani; Eman A Alshahrani; Zahra A Alsafi
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 2.430

7.  Comparative Effect of two Types of Surface Treatments on Shear Bond Strength of New Composite to Old Composite.

Authors:  Seyedeh Maryam Tavangar; Reza Tayefeh Davalloo; Tayebeh Rostamzadeh; Farideh Darabi; Seyed Mohammad Ali Mirabolghasemi; Reza Ahmadi
Journal:  J Dent (Shiraz)       Date:  2021-12

8.  In vitro evaluation of repair bond strength of composite: Effect of surface treatments with bur and laser and application of universal adhesive.

Authors:  Nazanin Kiomarsi; Melika Espahbodi; Nasim Chiniforush; Mohammad Javd Karazifard; Sedighe Sadat Hashemi Kamangar
Journal:  Laser Ther       Date:  2017-09-30

9.  Bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to composite submitted to different surface pretreatments.

Authors:  Victor Hugo Dos Santos; Sandro Griza; Rafael Ratto de Moraes; André Luis Faria-E-Silva
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2014-01-20

10.  Effect of composite surface treatment and aging on the bond strength between a core build-up composite and a luting agent.

Authors:  Caroline Cotes; Mayra Cardoso; Renata Marques de Melo; Luiz Felipe Valandro; Marco Antonio Bottino
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.