Literature DB >> 22146279

Innovation in growing rod technique: a study of safety and efficacy of a magnetically controlled growing rod in a porcine model.

Behrooz A Akbarnia1, Gregory M Mundis, Pooria Salari, Burt Yaszay, Jeff B Pawelek.   

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN.: Prospective in vivo randomized study. OBJECTIVE.: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a distraction-based magnetically controlled growing rod (MCGR) in a porcine model. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: A high number of complications related to frequent surgical rod lengthenings has been a generally accepted outcome in growing rod surgery for early-onset scoliosis. A potentially safer technique is a system that does not require repetitive surgery. METHODS.: Seven-month-old pigs were randomly assigned to an experiment group (EG; n = 6) and a sham group (SG; n = 3). One animal in the EG became paralyzed because of a misplaced pedicle screw and was killed per the study protocol. Therefore, a total of 8 animals completed the study. The EG underwent weekly spine distraction using the MCGR. Spinal height was assessed by vertebral unit height measurements on weekly lateral radiographs. RESULTS.: A total of 49 mm of distraction across the unfused vertebral levels was planned during a 7-week period (7 mm per wk). Radiographical analysis of the MCGR device revealed an average distraction of 39 mm (range, 32-46 mm), resulting in achievement of 80% of predicted spinal height. Prior to removal of implants, spinal height for the EG was similar to the SG. However, accelerated increase in vertebral unit height was noted in the EG during the 3-week period after implant removal, which resulted in significantly greater overall spinal height in the EG (32.2% vs. 11.7%, P ≤ 0.05). No MCGR-related complications occurred. CONCLUSION.: The MCGR provided 80% of predicted spinal height by noninvasive remote distraction in this animal model. The accelerated increase in spinal height of the experimental animals after implant removal was an unexpected finding which requires additional research to better understand the effect of distraction on spinal growth. This study establishes a foundation for future research in an attempt to use a less invasive technique in distraction-based correction of early-onset scoliosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22146279     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318240ff67

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  16 in total

Review 1.  [Treatment of early onset scoliosis : How far can we go?].

Authors:  D Studer; C C Hasler; A Schulze
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  Growing rod concepts: state of the art.

Authors:  Muharrem Yazici; Z Deniz Olgun
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Bacterial colonization of VEPTR implants under repeated expansions in children with severe early onset spinal deformities.

Authors:  Christian Plaass; Carol Claudius Hasler; Ulrich Heininger; Daniel Studer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Early onset scoliosis: current concepts and controversies.

Authors:  Nicholas D Fletcher; Robert W Bruce
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2012-06

5.  Radiological and clinical assessment of the distraction achieved with remotely expandable growing rods in early onset scoliosis.

Authors:  D Rolton; C Thakar; J Wilson-MacDonald; C Nnadi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Current benchtop protocols are not appropriate for the evaluation of distraction-based growing rods: a literature review to justify a new protocol and its development.

Authors:  Niloufar Shekouhi; Amey Kelkar; David Dick; Vijay K Goel; Derek Shaw
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Magnetic growth modulation in orthopaedic and spine surgery.

Authors:  Adam E M Eltorai; Carolina Fuentes
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-01-30

8.  How precise is the PRECICE compared to the ISKD in intramedullary limb lengthening? Reliability and safety in 26 procedures.

Authors:  Frank M Schiedel; Björn Vogt; Henning L Tretow; Britta Schuhknecht; Georg Gosheger; Melanie J Horter; Robert Rödl
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  Pedicle Screw Fixation Study in Immature Porcine Spines to Improve Pullout Resistance during Animal Testing.

Authors:  Sophie Le Cann; Thibaut Cachon; Eric Viguier; Lotfi Miladi; Thierry Odent; Jean-Marie Rossi; Patrick Chabrand
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  The MAGEC system for spinal lengthening in children with scoliosis: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance.

Authors:  Michelle Jenks; Joyce Craig; Joanne Higgins; Iain Willits; Teresa Barata; Hannah Wood; Christine Kimpton; Andrew Sims
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.561

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.