Literature DB >> 22145854

Effects of magnesium-substituted nanohydroxyapatite coating on implant osseointegration.

Shi-fang Zhao1, Qiao-hong Jiang, Sean Peel, Xiao-xiang Wang, Fu-ming He.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare magnesium-substituted and pure hydroxyapatite coatings on the promotion of osteogenesis in vitro and on the osseointegration in vivo.
METHODS: Electrochemically deposited pure hydroxyapatite (EDHA) or electrochemically deposited magnesium-substituted hydroxyapatite (EDMHA) coatings were formed on the surface of pure titanium disks or implants. MC3T3-E1 preosteoblasts were cultured in the EDHA and EDMHA coated disks, and cell growth, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, and osteocalcin secretion were measured at various time points. For studies on osseointegration, 30 roughened implants coated either with EDHA or EDMHA (n = 15 for each coating) were implanted in the femurs of 15 NZW rabbits. After 2, 4, and 8 weeks, femurs were retrieved and prepared for histomorphometric evaluation (n = 5 for each coating at each time point).
RESULTS: MC3T3-E1 cells cultured on EDMHA coated disks showed increased cell number, ALP, and osteocalcin secretion compared with the EDHA coated disks at all time points (P < 0.05 for all). Histologic observation of the coated implants showed woven bone in direct contact with both implant surfaces after 2 weeks and mature bone after 8 weeks. While there were no differences in the amount of bone between the threads at any time point, the percentage of implant in direct contact with bone (bone implant contact) was slightly higher along the EDMHA coated implants at 2 weeks (P = 0.086), although this difference was no longer seen at 4 and 8 weeks.
CONCLUSION: Mg-substituted HA coated surfaces promote osteogenic differentiation of preosteoblasts in vitro and may improve implant osseointegration during the early stages of bone healing compared with pure EDHA coated surfaces.
© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Keywords:  electrochemical process; implant; magnesium; nanohydroxyapatite coating; osseointegration; titanium

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22145854     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02362.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  9 in total

1.  Bioactive amorphous magnesium phosphate-polyetheretherketone composite filaments for 3D printing.

Authors:  Prabaha Sikder; Jessica A Ferreira; Ehsan Akbari Fakhrabadi; Karla Z Kantorski; Matthew W Liberatore; Marco C Bottino; Sarit B Bhaduri
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 5.304

2.  Development of a facile fluorophosphonate-functionalised titanium surface for potential orthopaedic applications.

Authors:  Anna I Shiel; Wayne N Ayre; Ashley W Blom; Keith R Hallam; Peter J Heard; Oliver Payton; Loren Picco; Jason P Mansell
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Magnesium-doped Nanostructured Titanium Surface Modulates Macrophage-mediated Inflammatory Response for Ameliorative Osseointegration.

Authors:  Xinrui Qiao; Jie Yang; Yuli Shang; Shu Deng; Shiyu Yao; Zhe Wang; Yi Guo; Cheng Peng
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2020-09-29

Review 4.  Substituted hydroxyapatite coatings of bone implants.

Authors:  Daniel Arcos; María Vallet-Regí
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 6.331

5.  Monetite and brushite coated magnesium: in vivo and in vitro models for degradation analysis.

Authors:  Shaylin Shadanbaz; Jemimah Walker; Tim B F Woodfield; Mark P Staiger; George J Dias
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 3.896

6.  Development of thermosensitive hydrogels of chitosan, sodium and magnesium glycerophosphate for bone regeneration applications.

Authors:  Jana Lisková; Lucie Bačaková; Agata L Skwarczyńska; Olga Musial; Vitaliy Bliznuk; Karel De Schamphelaere; Zofia Modrzejewska; Timothy E L Douglas
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2015-04-09

Review 7.  Applications of Biodegradable Magnesium-Based Materials in Reconstructive Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: A Review.

Authors:  Sanja Vujović; Jana Desnica; Dragana Stanišić; Irena Ognjanović; Momir Stevanovic; Gvozden Rosic
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-08-28       Impact factor: 4.927

8.  Comparative study of porous hydroxyapatite/chitosan and whitlockite/chitosan scaffolds for bone regeneration in calvarial defects.

Authors:  Ding Zhou; Chao Qi; Yi-Xuan Chen; Ying-Jie Zhu; Tuan-Wei Sun; Feng Chen; Chang-Qing Zhang
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2017-04-04

9.  Effect of sintering parameters on physical and mechanical properties of powder injection moulded stainless steel-hydroxyapatite composite.

Authors:  Mohd Ikram Ramli; Abu Bakar Sulong; Norhamidi Muhamad; Andanastuti Muchtar; Amir Arifin; Farhana Mohd Foudzi; Mohannad Saleh Hammadi Al-Furjan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.