| Literature DB >> 22145819 |
Fernando Masarin1, Daniela B Gurpilhares, David Cf Baffa, Márcio Hp Barbosa, Walter Carvalho, André Ferraz, Adriane Mf Milagres.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The recalcitrance of lignocellulosic materials is a major limitation for their conversion into fermentable sugars. Lignin depletion in new cultivars or transgenic plants has been identified as a way to diminish this recalcitrance. In this study, we assessed the success of a sugarcane breeding program in selecting sugarcane plants with low lignin content, and report the chemical composition and agronomic characteristics of eleven experimental hybrids and two reference samples. The enzymatic digestion of untreated and chemically delignified samples was evaluated to advance the performance of the sugarcane residue (bagasse) in cellulosic-ethanol production processes.Entities:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22145819 PMCID: PMC3267660 DOI: 10.1186/1754-6834-4-55
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels ISSN: 1754-6834 Impact factor: 6.040
Chemical composition* of sugarcane bagasse samples obtained from experimental sugarcane hybrids ranked† by their lignin content
| Clone | Total lignin | Hemicellulose | Glucan | Extractives | Sum |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 89 | 16.8 ± 0.1a | 27.3 ± 0.3a,c,d,f,i,j,k,l,m | 40.3 ± 0.1a,b,c,d,f,g,h,i,j,k,l,m | 7.5 ± 0.1a | 92.0 |
| 146 | 18.6 ± 0.1b,c,d | 31.6 ± 0.8b,e,g,h | 40.9 ± 0.3b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,l | 2.4 ± 0.1b,c,d,e,g,h,i,l,m | 93.5 |
| 58 | 18.6 ± 0.1c,d | 26.3 ± 0.1c,d,f,i,j,k,l,m | 40.9 ± 0.3c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,l | 2.6 ± 0.2c,d,e,h,i,l,m | 88.4 |
| 53 | 19.4 ± 0.5d,e,f,g | 27.1 ± 0.4d,f,i,j,k,l,m | 42.2 ± 0.5d,e,f,g,h,i,l | 2.7 ± 0.1d,e,h,i,l,m | 91.3 |
| 166 | 19.6 ± 0.5e,f,g,h,i | 31.5 ± 0.1e,g,h | 43.2 ± 0.4e,f,h,l | 1.9 ± 0.1e,g,h,l,m | 96.2 |
| 87 | 19.7 ± 0.1f,g,h,i,j | 27.3 ± 0.8f,i,j,k,l,m | 42.2 ± 0.3f,g,h,i,l | 3.9 ± 0.4f,i | 93.1 |
| 321 | 20.2 ± 0.4g,h,i,j | 31.0 ± 1.0g,h | 40.4 ± 0.5g,h,i,j,k,l,m | 1.6 ± 0.3g,l | 92.9 |
| 50 | 20.5 ± 0.1h,i,j | 30.0 ± 2.0h,j | 42.0 ± 1.0h,i,l | 2.5 ± 0.1h,i,l,m | 94.6 |
| 8 | 20.5 ± 0.4i,j | 26.6 ± 0.7i,j,k,l,m | 40.0 ± 1.0i,j,k,l,m | 3.2 ± 0.4i,m | 90.0 |
| 121 | 20.6 ± 0.1j,k | 28.2 ± 0.5j,k,l | 39.0 ± 1.0j,k,m | 4.9 ± 0.2j,k | 92.9 |
| 140 | 21.5 ± 0.2k | 27.0 ± 0.3k,l,m | 38.2 ± 0.5k,m | 5.1 ± 0.5k | 91.8 |
| MB | 24.0 ± 0.1l,m | 26.0 ± 1.0l,m | 42.0 ± 2.0l | 2.2 ± 0.4l,m | 93.8 |
| RC | 24.5 ± 0.5m | 25.2 ± 0.4m | 38.2 ± 0.2m | 2.6 ± 0.1m | 90.5 |
*Data are mean ± standard deviation.
‡Mill bagasse.
§Reference cultivar.
In each column, the values with the same superscript letters do not differ among themselves at significance level of 0.05.
Chemical characteristics of the fraction extracted with 95% ethanol from sugarcane bagasse samples
| Sample | Total extractives, % | Compounds, mg/g | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aromatics | Carbohydrates | Waxes* | ||
| 89 | 7.5 | 144 | 86 | 770 |
| 166 | 1.9 | 405 | 88 | 507 |
| 87 | 3.9 | 434 | 59 | 507 |
| 321 | 1.6 | 382 | 35 | 583 |
| 140 | 5.1 | 377 | 59 | 564 |
| MB† | 2.2 | 609 | 186 | 205 |
| RCr‡ | 2.6 | 382 | 74 | 544 |
*Calculated by subtracting the amounts of aromatics and sugars from the total amount of extractives.
†Mill bagasse.
‡Reference cultivar.
Hydroxycinnamic acid composition of sugarcane bagasse samples obtained from experimental sugarcane hybrids ranked by their lignin content
| Clone | Hydroxycinnamic acids, g/100g of untreated bagasse | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released by mild alkali treatment | Released by severe alkali treatment | |||||
| Ferulic | Coumaric | Sum | Ferulic | Coumaric | Sum | |
| 89 | 0.50 ± 0.01a,b,c,d,f,h,i,j,k,l | 1.8 ± 0.1a,d,f,h,l | 2.3 ± 0.1a,d,f,l | 1.1 ± 0.1a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k,l | 3.9 ± 0.5a,c,d,f,h,j,k | 5.0 ± 0.5a,c,d,f,h,i,j,k |
| 146 | 0.59 ± 0.02b,c,e,g,h,i,j,k,m | 2.5 ± 0.2b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k,l,m | 3.1 ± 0.2b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k,m | 1.4 ± 0.1b,e,f,g,h,l,m | 6.2 ± 0.5b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k,l,m | 7.6 ± 0.5b,e,f,g,h,i,j,k,l,m |
| 58 | 0.59 ± 0.01c,e,g,h,i,j,k,m | 2.6 ± 0.1c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k,m | 3.2 ± 0.1c,d,e,g,h,i,j,k,m | 0.8 ± 0.2c,d,f,i,j,k | 4.4 ± 1.2c,d,e,f,h,i,j,k,l | 5.2 ± 1.2c,d,f,h,i,j,k |
| 53 | 0.49 ± 0.02d,f,h,i,j,k,l | 2.2 ± 0.1d,e,f,h,i,j,k,l,m | 2.7 ± 0.1d,f,h,i,j,k,l | 0.9 ± 0.1d,f,h,i,j,k | 4.6 ± 0.9d,e,f,h,i,j,k,l | 5.5 ± 0.9d,f,h,i,j,k,l |
| 166 | 0.63 ± 0.05e,g,h,i,m | 2.8 ± 0.3e,g,h,i,j,k,m | 3.4 ± 0.3e,g,h,i,j,k,m | 1.4 ± 0.1e,f,g,h,l,m | 6.2 ± 0.2e,f,g,h,i,j,k,l,m | 7.6 ± 0.2e,f,g,h,i,j,k,l,m |
| 87 | 0.42 ± 0.04f,j,l | 2.1 ± 0.3f,h,i,k,l | 2.5 ± 0.3f,h,k,l | 1.1 ± 0.1f,g,h,i,j,k,l | 5.7 ± 0.9f,g,h,i,j,k,l,m | 6.8 ± 0.9f,g,h,i,j,k,l |
| 321 | 0.65 ± 0.01g,m | 2.9 ± 0.1g,h,i,j,k,m | 3.6 ± 0.1g,h,i,j,k,m | 1.4 ± 0.1g,h,l,m | 6.8 ± 0.5g,h,i,j,k,l,m | 8.2 ± 0.5g,h,i,j,k,l,m |
| 50 | 0.55 ± 0.03h,i,j,k,l,m | 2.4 ± 0.2h,i,j,k,l,m | 3.0 ± 0.2h,i,j,k,l,m | 1.2 ± 0.1h,i,j,k,l | 5.2 ± 0.4h,i,j,k,l | 6.4 ± 0.4h,i,j,k,l |
| 8 | 0.55 ± 0.07i,j,k,l,m | 2.7 ± 0.4i,j,k,m | 3.3 ± 0.4i,j,k,m | 1.0 ± 0.1i,j,k | 6.0 ± 0.2i,j,k,l,m | 7.0 ± 0.2i,j,k,l |
| 121 | 0.50 ± 0.04j,k,l | 2.8 ± 0.3j,k,m | 3.3 ± 0.3j,k,m | 0.9 ± 0.1j,k | 5.8 ± 0.5j,k,l,m | 6.7 ± 0.5j,k,l |
| 140 | 0.53 ± 0.02k,l,m | 2.6 ± 0.1k,m | 3.0 ± 0.1k,l,m | 1.0 ± 0.1k | 5.2 ± 0.3k,l | 6.2 ± 0.3k,l |
| MB‡ | 0.47 ± 0.01l | 1.9 ± 0.1l | 2.4 ± 0.1l | 1.4 ± 0.2l,m | 6.1 ± 0.8l,m | 7.5 ± 0.8l,m |
| RC§ | 0.62 ± 0.01m | 2.8 ± 0.1m | 3.4 ± 0.1m | 1.7 ± 0.2m | 7.5 ± 1.0m | 9.2 ± 1.0m |
*Data are mean ± standard deviation.
†. The same as the Table 1 footnote
‡Mill bagasse.
§Reference cultivar.
Figure 1Correlation of lignin and hydroxycinnamic acid content. Correlation of lignin and hydroxycinnamic acid content (released by severe alkaline treatment) in sugarcane samples. Black circles denote p-coumaric acid content only; white circles denote total hydroxycinnamic acid content.
Plant productivity parameters, biomass content and sucrose yield of experimental sugarcane hybrids ranked by their lignin content
| Hybrid number | Plant productivity, wet ton/hectare | Diameter at internode, mm | Plant bending score* | Dry biomass content (bagasse), kg/ton of wet plant | Sucrose yield, kg/ton of wet plant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 89 | 101.2 | 25 | 2 | 176.0 | 142.5 |
| 146 | 52.6 | 20 | 4 | 84.4 | 147.4 |
| 58 | 84.9 | 32 | 3 | 142.4 | 131.1 |
| 53 | 63.9 | 25 | 5 | 135.4 | 124.5 |
| 166 | 50.5 | 28 | 1 | 112.4 | 138.9 |
| 87 | 81.8 | 25 | - | 190.2 | 137.8 |
| 321 | 54.4 | 30 | 2 | 115.2 | 119.1 |
| 50 | 72.9 | 24 | 1 | 97.4 | 143.4 |
| 8 | 84.7 | 25 | 1 | 131.2 | 152.0 |
| 121 | 91.4 | 26 | 3 | 114.8 | 117.1 |
| 140 | 88.0 | 33 | 3 | 175.8 | 123.1 |
*Degree of plant bending in the stalk was scored from 1 (straight) to 5 (bent).
Figure 2Cellulose conversion of bagasse. Conversion of cellulose to glucose by direct enzymatic hydrolysis of sugarcane bagasse samples obtained from experimental sugarcane hybrids varying in lignin content. Average standard deviations, calculated from triplicates, were 9.0%, 6.6% and 5.9% of the experimental values at the reaction times of 24, 48 and 72 hours, respectively.
Figure 3Cellulose conversion as a function of lignin. Relationship of cellulose conversion to the lignin content of sugarcane samples. Black circles denote untreated sugarcane clones; white squares denote chlorite-delignified reference sugarcane cultivar; white triangles denote chlorite-delignified experimental hybrid number 146. Average standard deviations, calculated from triplicates, were 5.9%, 5.3% and 3.3% of the experimental values for the untreated samples, chlorite-delignified reference cultivar samples, and chlorite-delignified hybrid 146 samples, respectively.